Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Monday, February 25, 2013
Friday, February 22, 2013
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Monday, February 18, 2013
Friday, February 15, 2013
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Monday, February 11, 2013
Monday, February 4, 2013
Friday, February 1, 2013
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Monday, January 28, 2013
Friday, January 25, 2013
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Monday, January 21, 2013
Friday, January 18, 2013
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Monday, January 14, 2013
Friday, January 11, 2013
Jim Fetzer on Kevin Barrett's Truth Jihad Radio
Show description:
Second hour: Long-time listeners know that I admire Dr. James Fetzer's work, agree with him on many but not all issues, but am not always impressed by the infamous "Fetzer school of tact and diplomacy." Still, I am even less impressed by his enemies, including some otherwise good people like Kevin Ryan and Anthony Lawson, who sometimes fall into mindless anti-Fetzer hysteria.
The latest anti-Fetzer hysteric is my AFR co-host Pete Santilli, a fanatical Judy Wood cultist who launched a completely unhinged attack on Fetzer last week. Pete's gripe: He claims that Fetzer is somehow covering up Judy Wood's efforts to attribute the 9/11 demolitions to mysterious "directed energy weapons." What a crock! The fact is that Jim Fetzer is virtually the only major figure in the 9/11 truth movement who ever gave Judy Wood a fair hearing. Before attacking Fetzer, Santilli should be targeting every other important member of the 9/11 truth movement, virtually none of whom has ever had much use for Judy Wood.
Judy Wood is obviously a paranoid "if you're not with me you're against me" personality, and her paranoid style has proved contagious; most of her supporters, including Santilli, are equally nutty. This paranoid style has alienated 90% of the truth movement, and 100% of people unfamiliar with 9/11 truth. But that doesn't mean Judy's wrong; she may well be correct in arguing that various anomalies surrounding the 9/11 demolitions suggest that some sort of ultra-high-energy device(s), perhaps mini-nukes or other "classified" weapons, were used. If so, the perps are undoubtedly happy that such a paranoid and divisive personality is "poisoning the well."
Kevin Barrett / Ian Henshall and Jim Fetzer
Second hour: Long-time listeners know that I admire Dr. James Fetzer's work, agree with him on many but not all issues, but am not always impressed by the infamous "Fetzer school of tact and diplomacy." Still, I am even less impressed by his enemies, including some otherwise good people like Kevin Ryan and Anthony Lawson, who sometimes fall into mindless anti-Fetzer hysteria.
The latest anti-Fetzer hysteric is my AFR co-host Pete Santilli, a fanatical Judy Wood cultist who launched a completely unhinged attack on Fetzer last week. Pete's gripe: He claims that Fetzer is somehow covering up Judy Wood's efforts to attribute the 9/11 demolitions to mysterious "directed energy weapons." What a crock! The fact is that Jim Fetzer is virtually the only major figure in the 9/11 truth movement who ever gave Judy Wood a fair hearing. Before attacking Fetzer, Santilli should be targeting every other important member of the 9/11 truth movement, virtually none of whom has ever had much use for Judy Wood.
Judy Wood is obviously a paranoid "if you're not with me you're against me" personality, and her paranoid style has proved contagious; most of her supporters, including Santilli, are equally nutty. This paranoid style has alienated 90% of the truth movement, and 100% of people unfamiliar with 9/11 truth. But that doesn't mean Judy's wrong; she may well be correct in arguing that various anomalies surrounding the 9/11 demolitions suggest that some sort of ultra-high-energy device(s), perhaps mini-nukes or other "classified" weapons, were used. If so, the perps are undoubtedly happy that such a paranoid and divisive personality is "poisoning the well."Kevin Barrett / Ian Henshall and Jim Fetzer
Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Monday, January 7, 2013
Friday, January 4, 2013
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Monday, December 31, 2012
Friday, December 28, 2012
Monday, December 24, 2012
Friday, December 21, 2012
Bank Robbers and Serial Killers? The CIA hires them, the FBI ignores them
by Jim Fetzer
"[A]sking the EFF BEE EYE in the year 2012 for 'help' is like substituting your normal foam life vest on your boat, with a series of ten pound LEAD weights all cobbled together in a vest formation."--an anonymous friend
When you dig into conspiracies like JFK and 9/11, as I have done, and host a radio program discussing them, you cannot always predict how things are going to play out. Several years ago, for example, I began to hear from a woman who used the handle "Agent Ladybug", which sound innocuous on its face, but where the story she had to tell--as it has gradually unwoven--would make your hair curl. If what she has been telling me is correct--and, to my ear, it has the ring of truth--then she has been associating with one or more serial killers, who may even have been involved in crimes as serious as the assassinations of JFK, MLK, RFK and even John F. Kennedy, Jr.The persons she has identified to me include her own brother, Roland Ottus, for whom she introduced the named "Raoul" and told me he had been involved in the death of MLK. She also explained that another member of this gang (although she has not used that word) was photographed in front of the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City, where even J. Edgar Hoover himself acknowledged that this person was not the man accused of the assassination of JFK. According to my source, it was actually Walter Tabinski. And the most dangerous of these three, Clyde Forshaw, has committed serial murders, if her information is correct, some of which she personally witnessed herself. I grant that her story is difficult to believe, but she has a mountain of details and other considerations to back it up.
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Monday, December 17, 2012
Friday, December 14, 2012
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Monday, December 10, 2012
Friday, December 7, 2012
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Monday, December 3, 2012
Friday, November 30, 2012
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Monday, November 26, 2012
Friday, November 23, 2012
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Monday, November 19, 2012
Friday, November 16, 2012
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Monday, November 12, 2012
Friday, November 9, 2012
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
Bob Fitrakis / Rolf Lindgren / Totalinfo
Why wasn't this election stolen by the GOP? / More election reactions
Monday, November 5, 2012
Friday, November 2, 2012
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
Monday, October 29, 2012
Friday, October 26, 2012
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Monday, October 22, 2012
Friday, October 19, 2012
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Monday, October 15, 2012
Friday, October 12, 2012
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Monday, October 8, 2012
Friday, October 5, 2012
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Friday, September 28, 2012
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Monday, September 24, 2012
Friday, September 21, 2012
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
"Innocence of Muslims", the GOP and World War III
“Innocence of Muslims”, the GOP and World War III
by Jim Fetzer
We are being told by ABC News that Iran has launched a submarine and a destroyer into the Persian Gulf from Bandar Abbas port on Tuesday at the same time as U.S. and allied forces held massive naval exercises in the same waters to practice keeping oil shipping lanes open.
Tehran has repeatedly threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, a route for oil exports from the gulf, if Iranian nuclear sites are attacked by Israel, which believes Tehran is trying to develop an atomic bomb. But think about it.
As Mike Rivero observes, this may well be a propaganda run-up to a false flag attack in which one of Israel’s Dolphin submarines, admitted by Germany to be armed with nuclear-tipped cruise missiles, sneaks up along the Iranian cost and fires an attack at a US ship, quite possibly the soon-to-be-scrapped USS Enterprise. So, ahead of hearing the Big Bang and the inevitable screams from Israel’s presstitutes at ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX. Just use your common sense and ask yourself why Iran, trying as hard as they can to avoid a war, would initiate such a foolish attack? As a reminder, Iran has not started a war in over 300 years. And a “false flag” attack under these circumstances would be all too easy to arrange. We are on the verge of World War III. How did we reach this point?
Monday, September 17, 2012
Friday, September 14, 2012
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Monday, September 10, 2012
Friday, September 7, 2012
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Monday, September 3, 2012
Friday, August 31, 2012
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
