Wednesday, March 11, 2015

Allan Weisbecker, 9/11 Video Fakery & The New JFK Show #51

Allan Weisbecker, 9/11 Video Fakery and Disbelief & The New JFK Show #51 with JiM Fetzer, Gary King and Larry Rivera. TimeLife Entertainment has release approximately 6 minutes of video from "The Tonight Show" staring Johnny Carson. We have incorparated this classic footage into a new video of an old audio recording. We have included an interview with Jim Garrison's son Jasper Garrison at 45:45 of this video. Jasper Garrison provides insight at the end of the show recounting his fathers reacton after appearing on "The Johnny Carson Show".

20 comments:

  1. Thanks, Jim, for these shows.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, thanks, Jim, for all the hard work you do putting together these podcasts, and all your research, writing, activism, etc. How you find time and energy for this is a mystery and I feel somewhat like an ingrate making this criticism. But I must disagree somewhat.

    I'm glad to know you now accept that the images of the planes were faked as were the gashes in the towers. If you accept that as fact, it follows that the fireballs, the drifting white smoke coming out of the upper windows and the billowing black smoke stretching for miles to the west from each tower were also faked.

    Because there exists only 102 minutes of "live" film from the breaking news event of the first plane hit on WTC1 to the images of the total disappearance of the towers to dense white smoke and rubble, the tape has to have been a single piece of footage which was shown on all five networks.

    The question is, where do you draw the line between the two events of (1) the faked plane hits and (2) the collapse of the buildings which you believe are not faked?

    Could it be that five separate tape cassettes were made and one given to each of the five networks as a cover for the controlled demolition that went on during the showing of the tape? That would account for the slight but similar differences between the tapes including the one "dive bomber" approach by one of the planes. Occam's razor.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bravo, Gary, for showing the Johnny Carson/Garrison interview. Garrison was beautifully prepared while Carson was impishly foolish and the audience knew it. It should be noted that NBC, Carson's network, was the most active of the networks which went to work most diligently to discredit the Garrison case and ruin his career. It was NBC that had to give Garrison the rebuttal time of one hour uninterrupted air time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Joan Edwards said: "Could it be that five separate tape cassettes were made and one given to each of the five networks as a cover for the controlled demolition that went on during the showing of the tape?"

    Joan, as far as I'm aware, the "live" tower destructs of WTC1 and 2 were _not_ shown "live" simultaneously on all 5 MSM networks.[If thats what you meant to imply- but not sure]

    Only two of the 5 networks carried one each of the two complete "live" tower destruct sequences.

    That is, WTC 2's destruct [the first one to go] was shown,from start to finish,"live" _only_ on NBC.

    None of the other 4 networks showed a complete live collapse sequence of WTC2, according to the archived footage on line.

    See: "Two Original, Complete, Top To Bottom "Live" MSM WTC1&2 Collapse Sequences":
    http://onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.com/2014/12/two-original-complete-top-to-bottom.html

    As for the 2nd collapse [WTC1] again, only one network showed it "live" and complete [top to bottom], to the best of my knowledge at this time.

    This time it was CNN doing the er, " honors".

    This supposedly live footage was broadcast complete with 3 miraculously coincidental stop-start camera zoom-ins, which just happen to finally stop on a close up of the tower at almost the exact moment that the tower starts to fall ,[in, coincidentally, exactly the exact same manner as seen in the Fox5 Fl.175 strike sequence, when 3 similarly expertly timed zoom-ins halt just before the plane hits WTC2 :-) ], and then, the CNN WTC2 "magic" zoom-in is followed up by at least 3 highly suspicious camera switches/edits [ to show the collapse from different angles] during a supposed completely unpredicted live collapse/destruct that took at least 17 seconds to complete from top to bottom. [i.e._ Not_ the roughly 9 or 11 secs that the NIST, Fetzer and Fox, all claim :-) ].

    See:"9/11 Scams:The Faked "Live" CNN WTC1 Collapse Footage ":
    http://onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.com/2013/09/911-scamsthe-faked-live-cnn-wtc1.html

    But, I guess that for the average 9/11" truther", the appalling quality of the original TV broadcast footage, plus the "in your face" presence of multiple, miraculously timed camera zoom-ins on supposedly unpredicted events, plus multiple camera switches during an unpredicted shocking event lasting less than 20 secs, should all be dismissed as being merely coincidental, and not instead as "in our faces" clues to the fact that the entire 102 min. "live" broadcast of the events that morning was nothing more than prefabricated,[ie computer manufactured], imagery, falsely broadcast as being live "as it happens" imagery.

    And so it goes.

    Regards, onebornfree.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bravo, OBF. You are knowledgeable on the evidence of 9/11--the "live" footage. It is important that there is a verbal record of the videos. You are articulate and have a gift with words which describe images. I can see it in my mind--the image--but putting it into words is a challenge. What I see lacking with September Clues is that there is no "selling" of the evidence. The images in the videos need to be translated to words. Then the evidence can be argued. What I think happened was a typical controlled demolition, the area cordoned off, the buildings stripped down of contents and people kept from entering the area in the guise of a drill. We know that 90% of the victims are not on the SSDI. So much more......and it needs to be verbalized. OBF, it's up to you. Think of it. Only 1 hour and twenty two minutes to demolish the WTC and the perfect cover was keeping the TV occupied with pre-fabricated tapes. Imagine how impossible it would be for actual reporters to get to the scene and then capture shot after shot of the most difficult and rare shots of plane impacts and seconds-long building collapses. Why are there no scene of thousands fleeing the WTC?

      Delete
    2. OBF said: " Joan, as far as I'm aware, the "live" tower destructs of WTC1 and 2 were _not_ shown "live" simultaneously on all 5 MSM networks.[If thats what you meant to imply- but not sure]

      Only two of the 5 networks carried one each of the two complete "live" tower destruct sequences. "

      That's interesting. This is how we should be discussing 9/11--in terms of comparison of the five networks. I have not gotten beyond the versions of the UA175 plane hits. The dive bomber episode is on which network? Here, you have the same perspective of the buildings yet the plane is coming from the south whereas the other networks show the plane coming from the west and therefore needing to make a left turn in order to hit WTC's south facade.

      Delete
    3. Has anyone mentioned there is no "blur" on those planes hitting the WTC2? They look like flies creeping across the screen. Apparently, A&E are unaware of the original archived video footage as is Richard Gage.

      Delete
  6. Every time I've listened to or watch this Carson/Garrison clash thru the years I lose more respect for Johnny, what a FUCKING SHILL FOR THE JEWS. Sickening and Carson was exposed as a gov water boy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Joan Edwards said: " I have not gotten beyond the versions of the UA175 plane hits. The dive bomber episode is on which network? "

    The 16 sec. "divebomber" sequence was broadcast "live" in its entirety on a CBS affilliate.

    To see how the different MSM networks broadcast the Fl.175 "strike" event "live", check out Simon's video analysis " Synched Out":

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P9k7Et4zUk ,

    which simultaneously shows what all 5 network broadcast via Simon's use of a 5-way split screen.

    It's a very revealing analysis, that uncovers an at least 3 second difference in the time the plane hit, station to station.

    Or see my own post analyzing Simon's "Synched Out" analysis, here:

    "9/11, Deja Vu, and "The Matrix" ":

    http://onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.com/2014_11_01_archive.html

    It shows that al 5 stations were perfectly in synch up to the time of the 2nd strike, and were often broadcasting the exact same picture!

    Regards, onebornfree.

    P.S. Youtube banned "Synched Out" from Simon's account a couple of years ago, although others have now uploaded it and Youtube has not yet noticed :-) .

    ReplyDelete
  10. Joan Edwards said: "Has anyone mentioned there is no "blur" on those planes hitting the WTC2?"

    Alan Weisbecker did a Fetzer show where he pointed out that by his calculations there should be a 13 ft. [or thereabouts] motion blur , frame to frame, for a a plane allegedly traveling at 500mph [ a structurally impossible speed at that low altitude in any case :-) ], given the frame speed of the camera allegedly in use.

    He used the Hezarkhani sequence to illustrate the complete lack of _any_motion blur frame to frame, if I remember correctly.

    Regards, onebornfree.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. onebornfree said :"He used the Hezarkhani sequence to illustrate the complete lack of _any_motion blur, frame to frame,"

    Ruling out the use of holographic plane images, one of Mr Fetzers favorite propositions :-)

    See: "Why Jim Fetzer /Richard Hall/Ace Baker etc. Are Wrong About This Fl.175 Video" :
    http://onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.com/2014/02/911-scams-why-jim-fetzerace-baker-and.html

    Regards, onebornfree

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shouldn't we be studying what has been presented to the public as "live" footage of network breaking news on 9/11 in order to test for authenticity? Clips such as the Hezarkhani were not in that class having allegedly been taken by an amateur photographer not "live."
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      Synched Out - YouTube
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P9k7Et4zUk

      "ABC and CNN shared the only clear shot of a plane silhouette which we will all remember. The first sighting of a plane is on CBS as the "dive bomber." .......S.Shack

      All five networks were showing the same view of the towers at the time of the plane 175 hit. Therefore, the plane and subsequent fire ball should be seen occurring at the same time. Please correct me if I am wrong, but ony two planes (and no blur) are clearly seen approaching the towers on CBS and CNN. NBC shows a "dive bomber" view coming from the south. The other two networks only show the fireball.

      (This goes to the authenticity of the video footage. If authentic, all the networks should agree, not only in timing--synch--but in appearance as all shots are from the same perspective.)

      FOXED OUT part1 - YouTube
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzCW197AqpM

      See film footage from Hoboken. Plane is coming from wrong direction--from the east when it should be coming from the south as that is the path given in the official version having departed from Newark and turning back after being hijacked.


      FOXED OUT part2 - YouTube
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9LURV-joLI

      Later this plane in part1 was called nose in, nose out plane and removed from archives. Local station NY off air because transmitters were located on WTC.

      Delete


  13. Addressing the first of Allan's examples of video fakery - I've conducted several tests using measurements of distance between buildings and whether there is zooming involved which prove without doubt that the camera shots are from two different locations. The buildings farther away for example WTC 1 & 2 and surrounding buildings will remain in place, yet the 'Empire State Building' will seemly look like it has moved. Allan hasn't even taken in to consideration that the backgrounds in the videos offer any reference points because of the blank skylines which also proves the point I'm making beautifully, which makes the illusion possible. Again Allan is being incongruent with his viewers, exactly the same as he was about the 'motion blur' claims he made a year or so ago, which he used a poor quality video of Michael Herzarkhani. I have several of the MH videos which contain 'motion blur', plus my versions are sourced and raw versions. You don't seem to challenge Allan on this point, as I provided several to you Jim personally last year, or have you forgotten that? Plus has Allan not heard of parallax view? A lot of Allan's points have already been disproven a long time ago. Has he joined the likes of Simon Shack, Ace Baker, Markus Allen and OBF in the muddling up of the evidence, it seems to be the case to me, and you seem to be leading the charge.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Mark Conlon said: "Allan is being incongruent with his viewers, exactly the same as he was about the 'motion blur' claims he made a year or so ago, which he used a poor quality video of Michael Herzarkhani. "

    Not to defend Mr Weisbecker, who has , in previous appearances here, disparaged me by attempting to associate me with the "the jooz and Izrale dun 9/11 " crowd and their line of er "reasoning", but the Hezarkhani footage is demonstrably fake for any number of reasons, including the fact that in the last part of it, the plane image, which earlier is seen moving left to right toward the WTC building, then becomes completely stationary in mid air, while it is the building image itself which then moves, right to left, towards the plane image, thereby providing the illusion of the plane's further movement from left to right in the sequence.

    See: "Why Jim Fetzer /Richard Hall/Ace Baker etc. Are Wrong About This Fl.175 Video [Hezarkhani] ":

    http://onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.com/2014/02/911-scams-why-jim-fetzerace-baker-and.html

    Regards, onebornfree.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Mark Conlon said:" I have several of the MH videos which contain 'motion blur', plus my versions are sourced and raw versions. "

    Please provide links to those MH { Michael Hezarkhani] videos. Thanks.

    Regards, onebornfree
    www.onebornfre.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete