Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Gordon Duff / New JFK Show #29
Syria and ISIS / Larry Rivera on Billy Lovelady (w/ Gary King)
Top flight researcher Larry Rivera schools the JFK community on the murky world of Billy Lovelady and exposes the TSBD as a "Pick Your Pasty Factory." Don't forget! When it comes to NEW JFK research, NOBODY beats Larry Rivera!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
let's have a peaceful conversation this time.
ReplyDeleteAs a member of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, of course I agree that Oswald was Doorman. However, I disagree with the prevailing view that Lovelady was standing in the back covering his eyes. The witness testimony of Lovelady and Frazier is that Lovelady was on the steps below Sarah Stanton and Wesley Frazier, therefore he cannot be Doorman who was standing on the TOP level.
ReplyDeleteMr. LOVELADY – That’s on the second floor; so, I started going to the domino room where I generally went in to set down and eat and nobody was there and I happened to look on the outside and Mr. Shelley was standing outside with Miss Sarah Stanton, I believe her name is, and I said, “Well, I’ll go out there and talk with them, sit down and eat my lunch out there, set on the steps,” so I went out there.
Mr. BALL – You ate your lunch on the steps?
Mr. LOVELADY – Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL – Who was with you?
Mr. LOVELADY – Bill Shelley and Sarah Stanton, and right behind me…
Mr. BALL – What was that last name?
Mr. LOVELADY – Stanton.
Mr. BALL – What is the first name?
Mr. LOVELADY – Bill Shelley.
Mr. BALL – And Stanton’s first name?
Mr. LOVELADY – Miss Sarah Stanton.
Mr. BALL – Did you stay on the steps?
Mr. LOVELADY – Yes ............................
Lovelady was asked to point the black arrow to himself by placing it in a dark area (where it was invisible).
Mr. BALL – Draw an arrow down to that; do it in the DARK. You got an arrow in the DARK and one in the WHITE pointing toward you. Where were you when the picture was taken?
Mr. LOVELADY – Right there at the entrance of the building standing on the top step, would be here .
Mr. BALL – You were standing on which step?
Mr. LOVELADY – It would be your top level.
Mr. BALL – The top STEP you were standing there?
Mr. LOVELADY – Right.
(Lovelady realized he had mispoken and was coerced by Ball into saying he was on the TOP step, but not the TOP LEVEL)
Now let's look at Frazier's testimony:
Wesley Frazier confirmed Lovelady was on the steps in 5 interviews from 1963-86
11/22/63 to the DPD
3/1/64 at the WC
2/13/69 at the Garrison/Shaw trial
1978 at HSCA
1986 at the Oswald Mock trial
11/22 Dallas PD (handwritten statement and affidavit)
3/1/64 Warren Commission
Frazier testified that Lovelady was standing two or three steps below him. http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/frazierb1.htm
Mr. BALL – We have got a picture taken the day of the parade and it shows the President’s car going by.
Now, take a look at that picture. Can you see your picture any place there?
Mr. FRAZIER – No, sir; I don’t, because I was back up in this more or less BLACK AREA.
Mr. BALL – I see.
Mr. FRAZIER – Because Billy, like I say, is two or three steps down in front of me.
2/13/69 Clay Shaw/Garrison trial
http://www.jfk-online.com/fraziershaw.html
MR. ALCOCK:
Q: Mr.Frazier, do you recall who you were with during the presidential motorcade?
A: Yes, sir, I can. When I was standing there at the TOP of the stairs, I was standing there by a heavyset lady who worked up in our office, her name is SARA, I forget her last name, but she was standing right there beside me when we watched the motorcade.
Q: Do you recall anyone else who may have been with you?
A: Right down in front of me at the bottom of the steps my foreman Bill Shelley and Billy Lovelady were standing there.
1978 HSCA interview by Moriarity and Day
1986 Oswald Mock trial
Gerry Spence: “You recall that 23 years later that BNL was standing in front of you…About 4 STEPS IN FRONT OF YOU?”
Frazier: Yes it is........
What does this mean? The shirt evidence (see Judyth Baker's pixel analysis) is confirmed by the simple fact that Lovelady (his face conveniently cut out) was on the STEPS in front of Frazier while Oswald was Doorman on the TOP Level.
http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/08/07/10851/
Don't Become A Petty Criminal, Whatever U Do
ReplyDeleteThis was tremendous show by Gary King and Larry--what great research and investigation into Billy Lovelady--truly there was an absolutely HUGE network of patsies, "cut-outs," and all kinds of operators. Rather shows what can happen if one commits to a life of crime--u can too easily end up a tool of others' plots u know nothing about and would object to if u did know.
I remember back in the 90s when the European communist regimes were being de-activated, and the E. German Stasi head, by name of Marcus Wolf, I believe, was imported to USA, hired as consultant by US gov.--and lots of people were wondering about that.
Well, NOW, w. all this info about all the patsies and "cut-outs" on stand-by at Dallas in '63 we can understand--Wolf was rather an expert in running and keeping track of all kinds of patsies, "cut-outs," stooges, informants, et al., so ZOG decided they had an experienced expert to help and advise them, ho ho ho ho
Poor JFK: he thought he was going to do-away w. CIA, not realizing it was far, far bigger operation than he dreamed.
And don't forget LBJ was a Jew (a "crypto," as was his wife, "Ladybird"--see http://www.thenewsturmer.com/On%20Jews/LyndonJohnsonsgrandparents.htm); further, the Jews-media was all in w. the dis-info which immediately ensued.
Most heroic investigator was Jim Garrison, I believe--and look at how the Feds treated him--tried to set him up, submitting perjured testimony fm illegal wire-taps, etc.
Absolutely tremendous great broadcast--like all the others too, by Gary--and I've gone over and am ck-ing out the U-tube vid by Rivera, "JFK Horsemen." Keep it up. A.
I see also, Gary has several vids on U-tube.
DeleteThanks so much, Larry hit it out of the park! Your comments mean a lot to Larry and I, all we really get is a pat on the back and it's more than enough. GK
DeleteGood job, Gary!
ReplyDeleteThanks Solfeggio, Read comment above
DeleteGreat job Gary and Larry!
ReplyDeleteLarry Rivera is doing some of the best work in JFK assassination research. Larry is raising the bar and leaving a lot of the big names in the dust.
I used to look up to Robert Groden. But how can anyone in 2014 say that the Zapruder film hasn't been altered? Bob's stance on the Z-film really calls in to question all of his work on JFK.
I just heard Jim DiEugenio on Black Op Radio this week and he was talking about JFK's Middle East policy and he never made reference to Israel's illicit nuclear weapons program and JFK's efforts to halt it. Really Jim? JFK's refusal to let Ben-Gurion build nuclear weapons was the last straw and the reason JFK was assassinated. JFK was seen as a threat to the survival of Israel so the Zionists took him out and replaced him with the Jew LBJ.
9/11 Truth = Israel nuked New York and Washington, DC.
JFK Truth = Israel assassinated JFK and replaced him with a Zionist Jew. It truly was the assassination of America.
LBJ was Jew, see http://www.thenewsturmer.com/On%20Jews/LyndonJohnsonsgrandparents.htm
DeleteJew Involvement In JFK Assassination
DeleteOh yes, ck Michael Collins Piper's book on the MOSSAD/Israel connection to JFK assassination, "Final Judgment."
Piper pt.s out Permindex corp. which Clay Shaw was working for as board member was owned by, aside fm CIA, by MOSSAD and Jew organized crime run by Jew, Meyer Lansky.
The jury in New Orleans which acquitted Clay Shaw ADMITTED there was conspiracy, but they were more doubtful for Shaw's involvement, the CIA hiding fact that Shaw had been involved w. CIA, if not being outright CIA employee.
And of course, the mass-corp. Jews-media is run by Jews, see http://natvan.com/who-rules-america/index.html
Thanks Don! Good to know someone like you listens to the show and your up as a guest soon!
DeleteI listen to all of the shows Gary! I look forward to doing the show with you!
DeleteIgnorance & Stupidity Confuses Evidence & Proof, Ho Ho Ho
ReplyDeleteNick: there's PLENTY OF EVIDENCE--what u evidently confuse is conclusive "proof."
Note u need to grasp basic definitions and meanings of words when u speak--otherwise people may begin to mistake u for a brainless, stupid moron.
Observe the process (scientific and for criminal investigations) must make use of INDUCTIVE LOGIC--thus items and details are gathered which indicate the prospective conclusion. THEN one works to see if the conclusion can be falsified--or "disproven."
Thus I'd conclude there's OUTSTANDING EVIDENCE--is it absolute, conclusive proof, maybe not, but the thesis is worthy: LBJ was Jew, and there's strong evidence for the conclusion.
For u to say u've "never seen any evidence" is idiotically stupid--in fact, it's outright LIE, but u're excused for ur abysmal ignorance, ho ho ho ho ho
But let me hasten to agree w. the rest of nick's expo, above--makes sense to me. Ho ho ho ho
ReplyDelete"The Jewish banking capital became international, united through [mutually] intersecting [incestuous] marriages, and turned into a real international fortress... What could be a more convincing illustration of the fantastic conception of a worldwide Jewish government than the Rothschild family, uniting citizens of five different countries the separate conflicts of which didn't affect the interests of their respective state banks even for a moment!" — Jewess Hannah Arendt author of Eichmann in Jerusalem
ReplyDeleteSee, all this, as above quote, is EVIDENCE; only question is whether it's conclusive proof.
So eliminating Jews and their collaborators is legitimate warfare whence some innocents might have to perish--it's sad, but necessary for defense and preservation of humanity.
"If it acts like a duck, looks like a duck, walks like a duck, it's good (inductive) conclusion it's gosh-darn duck"
ReplyDeleteNote the conclusion might still be dis-proven, but it's justified if there's the inductive evidence and no "falsification."
Are Jews scum?--un-questionably, as there's tremendous inductive evidence. Is there any evidence that would dis-prove?--far too little, and what little there is is extremely questionable. Q.E.D.
I just ck'd Don Fox's links, above--by golly, but it's smashing, overwhelming INDUCTIVE evidence--is there any dis-confirming evidence?--doesn't look like it. THEREFORE, the inductive conclusion must stand, by golly.
ReplyDeleteOf course it may be "anti-Semitic," ho ho ho ho, but then, after all, anti-Semitism is obedience to God.
Aquino -- child molester (cover up in court) & Satanist at Presidio -- had an associate in general Vallely, who is leading ISIS. Read: http://tl.gd/n_1sci22v
ReplyDeleteDon, there is no evidence there that Johnson was a Jew unless we are to say that all contemporary American pols who are slaves to Jewish interests are Jews. Is everyone in Congress Jewish?
ReplyDeleteAnd, since you choose to associate with Gordon Duff, what if they were? Jews are truth-tellers, right?
ReplyDeleteThanks Don Fox and apsterian for your comments. Don, looking forward to tuning in when you do the show with Gary King on The Real Deal with Jim Fetzer
ReplyDeleteWant to make that Barmitzvah
Deletespecial? Get great new ideas
for all your Jewish celebratory needs!
Weddings, barmitzvahs, batmitzvahs, brises.
Full details on rabbis, venues, caterers, vendors.
Great deals and discounts available.
www.mazelmoments.com
There's Difference Btwn Judaism & Christianity
ReplyDeleteNick: remember something about Jews--THEY'RE TALMUDISTS, by definition. And u can ck this definition w. Jews and Christians who know. See RevisionistReview.blogspot.com and Come-and-hear.com
So what is the Talmud?--it's the Jew INTERPRETATION, according to rabbis, of the Word of God as given fm the Torah. Thus reality and Word of God are mere INTERPRETATIONS (subjectivism)--whatever these rabbis SAY it is.
Thus Talmud is divided in two main parts, "Mishnah" and "Gemarah"; Mishnah is INTERPRETATION of Torah, and Gemarah is INTERPRETATION OF Mishnah INTERPRETATION--get it?
And the great commandment in Talmud is WAR AGAINST GENTILES, whence lies are not merely excused but commended as legitimate conduct of war. And as reality for these Talmudic psychopaths is subjective, it's all justified for "good of Jews," hence then, in practice, for the rabbis and top master-minds.
Thus Jews will lie for everything and everyone--there's no OBJECTIVE reality for them. Jews will lie to the lower-level Jews AND EVEN TO THEMSELVES--reality is subjective for them, don't forget.
Such then is the GREAT CONFLICT btwn Judaism (Talmudism) and Christianity, Christianity preaching the OBJECTIVE reality, hence TRUTH TRUTH TRUTH as foremost ideal--see Gosp. JOHN 14:6, 8:32, and 18:37-8.
The Hidden Government Group Linking JFK, Watergate, Iran-Contra and 9/11 - See more at: http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/10/05/the-hidden-government-group-linking-jfk-watergate-iran-contra-and-911/#sthash.WPqJBCST.dpuf
ReplyDeletehttp://whowhatwhy.com/2014/10/05/the-hidden-government-group-linking-jfk-watergate-iran-contra-and-911/
* * * * * * * * *
Thus, fm above, Peter Dale Scott tells us yet more about the "deep state," and "continuity of gov.," linking the various conspiratorial events. Presumably this is more politically-correct consp.-theory, sanitized of our dear Jews.