Wednesday, October 8, 2014
Kevin Barrett / Gary King
Tehran conference / The New JFK Show #30 Jim and Gary discuss the two conferences in Washington DC. One Truth Fest and One Spook Fest.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
PLEASE SUPPORT REVERE RADIO:
SUBSCRIBE to the RSS feed
DONATE to Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
---------
(Right-click on guest name to download mp3)
SUBSCRIBE to the iTunes feed
STREAM premieres on Revere Radio
5pm CST (2300 GMT) M-W-F:
---
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2014
(158)
-
▼
October
(14)
- Judyth Vary Baker
- James Fetzer / JFK Show #33 (w/ Gary King)
- Nathan Folks, David Weiss
- James Fetzer / James Mariano
- Jim Fetzer / JFK Show #32 (w/ Gary King)
- Larry Hanrahan / Thomas Goodrich
- Margaret Siegrist
- Majia Nadesan / Gary King
- Pablo Novi Schanes
- James Perloff
- Kevin Barrett / Gary King
- Richie Allen / Tina Foster
- James Mariano / Nick Kollerstrom
- Gordon Duff / New JFK Show #29
-
▼
October
(14)
Now that we know that so much of what our media reports is total bullshit the time has come to expose the fakery within the JFK case.
ReplyDeleteIf you watch the whole "hit" on Oswald, you will notice that scene was just that. A scene...from a movie. Prior to Oswald entering the "stage", you can see all the "actors" getting on their "marks" all placed within the camera's field of view. You will also notice that a car horn is used as the cue for all the actors to start playing their part... including a false start caused by another car horn in the parking garage.
Although I am skeptical in regards to coincidences, I do believe coincidences are common. But....from what I have seen, the mysterious deaths of the grassy knoll witnesses have another explanation...they were all actors placed where they were to feed the narrative - similar to the 911 Harley Schmuck. Their mysterious deaths were faked later to create road blocks for further investigation as well as more points to be argued about creating diversion.
The proof? Simple. It is no coincidence that most of those witnesses lived for many years after the faked deaths.
And this is where my tolerance for coincidences end.... Because most of these "Dead Witnesses" are actually members of the Grand Ole Opry / Rockabilly Hall of Fame.
If it were just a few look a likes, it would just be coincidence. But, it's more than just a few.
That recent discovery puts into question many of the eyewitness accounts...as well it should...because witnesses lie.
In this case, the witnesses were controlled in advance - their testimonies written for them like a made for TV crime drama.
Sandy Hook, Columbine, Boston Bombing....there's nothing new. This shit's been going on for many years.
The Barrett interview was very interesting. I personally do not watch any news. For I know all of it is some type of propaganda or mind control. I do not have the time or energy to pursue the manufactured reality in real time.
ReplyDeleteThe corporate environment in which most people spend their time. Does not allow for the propaganda to be discussed in the workplace. Attitudes are molded to comply.
I am glad you folks do what you do. But, at the same time I feel sorry for you. Always chasing the donkey's tail. Waiting to see where he drags you next. Then you are forced to analyze. Why the donkey does what he does.
The work you guys do is still important.
Thanks.
Fetzer Must Get Beyond Mere, Idiot Zionism
ReplyDeleteK. Barrett talked about his paper on how the morons of Jew S A continue to go along w. ZOG all the Jew-serving lies--a subject very well-taken, indeed.
But then Barrett presents far too over-elaborate analysis, and out-of-context too.
I submit one must begin w. basic metaphysics and then work in to details, the objective, hence determined reality, hence CYCLIC phase of history, "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler, the West continuing w. it's "prosperity"--only at the end of the CYCLE whence Jews have taken-over the culture--Jews, along w. their accomplices/collaborators who push the general Platonic subjectivism and Kantian-type moralism.
So as long as US Dollar retains reserve-currency, Jews and ZOG can continue to fund their imperialist wars and its lying, supported by bread & circuses, Jews having effectively co-opted the Christian establishment.
Thus only minorities support kikes and Israel, though they're fully-funded; the opposition is minority, not funded at all, and even beset by IRS and ZOG police-state. MOST of the people are in the middle, thumbs up their behind, watching all the football games, bread & circuses, etc.
These people in the middle just go along, hoping and praying their "leaders" (ZOG) isn't lying to them, ho hoo hoh o oh ho ho
Fetzer and Barrett are used by ZOG to cow these poor victims in the middle, Fetzer pretending merely to being anti-Zionist, over-looking Jews and their Talmud. Barrett is just a joke, being Islamic himself.
What Fetzer must do (which he won't, of course) in order to have more serious impact is to EXAMINE THE TALMUD, and the effect upon the phony and half-baked "Christians."
By taking the cowardly way, as he does presently, and only denouncing "Zionism," Fetzer only helps and encourages the poor fools in the afore-mentioned "middle" to remain secure in their ignorance, fearful as it is.
So Fetzer can't bring himself to embrace Christianity for it's proper and thematic anti-Semitism, but at least he could expose in more matter-of-fact way satanic Judaism and the murderous Talmud.
"...hence CYCLIC phase of history, "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler, the West continuing w. it's "prosperity"..."
DeleteHence? Hence you should learn to fucking spell words properly.
It's "its prosperity" not "it's prosperity". Don't you know the difference between "its" and "it's"?
...and you call yourself a "philosopher"?? LOL
You won't see Professor James Fetzer PhD making such a basic English spelling mistake!!
Clear off!!
You illiterate fucking moron.
"So Fetzer can't bring himself to embrace Christianity for it's proper and thematic anti-Semitism,"
DeleteYou brainless moron! It's "for its
proper and thematic...." not "for
it's proper and thematic...."!!
You've got a nerve lecturing Professor James Fetzer PhD when you can't even write English!!
LOL
I remember Russ Baker from the 2004 stolen election in which he denied there was fraud and that Bush won fairly. I had him pegged then as one who never bothered to analyze the evidence. I have totally proved systemic election fraud. This is what Baker wrote on the 2004 election: http://www.russbaker.com/archives/TomPaine_com%20-%20Election%202004%20Stolen%20Or%20Lost.htm
ReplyDeleteThis is my mathematical analysis which proves systemic election fraud. Look closely at the 2004 proof: http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2013/01/31/historical-overview-of-election-fraud-analysis/
In July 2004 I began posting weekly Election Model projections based on the state and national polls. The model was the first to use Monte Carlo Simulation and sensitivity analysis to calculate the probability of winning the electoral vote. The final projection had Kerry winning 337 electoral votes with 51.8% of the two-party vote, closely matching the unadjusted exit polls.
The adjusted 2004 National Exit Poll was mathematically impossible; it was forced to match Kerry’s 48.3% recorded vote (the unadjusted NEP indicated that Kerry had 51.7%). The adjusted poll indicated that there were 52.6 million returning Bush 2000 voters (43% of the 122.3 million recorded). But Bush had just 50.5 million votes in 2000; only 48 million were alive in 2004. Assuming a 96% turnout, 46 million voted. Therefore, simple arithmetic shows that the adjusted NEP overstated the number of returning Bush voters by 6.6 (52.6-46) million. In order to match the recorded vote, there had to be an impossible 110% turnout of living Bush 2000 voters.
THE ULTIMATE PROOF THAT THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN IS CONFIRMED BY A) KERRY’S 4 MILLION NEW VOTER MARGIN (22 MILLION NEW VOTERS, NEARLY 60% FOR KERRY), B) 4 MILLION RETURNING GORE MARGIN AND C) 2 MILLION RETURNING NADER MARGIN. KERRY WON BY 10 MILLION VOTES.
The post-election True Vote Model calculated a feasible turnout of living 2000 voters based on Census total votes cast (recorded plus net uncounted), a 1.25% annual mortality rate and 98% Gore/Bush voter turnout. It determined that Kerry won by 67-57 million and had 379 EV. Kerry’s unadjusted state exit poll aggregate 51.0% share was close to his 51.7% unadjusted National Exit Poll share. He had 53.5% in the True Vote Model. There was further confirmation of a Kerry landslide.
Consider the adjustments made to the 2004 National Exit Poll crosstabs to force a match to the recorded vote.
Bush had a 48% national approval rating in the final 11 pre-election polls. The Final adjusted National Exit Poll was forced to indicate that he had a 53% approval rating. He had just a 50% rating in the unadjusted state exit poll weighted aggregate. Given the 3% differential, we can assume that the 48% pre-election approval rating was also inflated by 3% and was really 45% – a virtual match to the True Vote Model. The exit pollsters had to inflate Bush’s 48% pre-election average rating by 5% in the NEP in order to match the recorded vote. There was a 0.99 correlation ratio between Bush‘s state approval and his unadjusted exit poll share.
Similarly, the unadjusted state exit poll Democratic/Republican Party ID split was 38.8-35.1%. In order to force the National Exit Poll to match the recorded vote, it required a bogus 37-37% split. The correlation between state Republican Party ID and the Bush unadjusted shares was a near-perfect 0.93. This chart displays the state unadjusted Bush exit poll share, approval ratings and Party-ID.
Ho ho ho--this isn't the first crooked, cooked election--ck out the 1876 election btwn Tilden and Hayes--Tilden won by huge (relatively) margin, but not when Rep.s were the counters, ho ho ho ho
DeleteRegarding Baker, observe who he works for, pure establishment; ck Wikipedia's article on him: "Baker has written for many US publications including the New Yorker, Vanity Fair, the New York Times, The Nation, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, the Village Voice, Esquire, Slate and Salon, and served as a contributing editor to the Columbia Journalism Review."
Deletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russ_Baker
A few questions on the Teheran Conference attended by Kevin Barrett. (How interesting to know the ADL is always on the job trying to incriminate anyone who would speak his truth on Israel. So many lives/careers haves been ruined such as those of Jim Traficant, Cynthia McKinney, Randy Weaver, people at Waco, etc.)
ReplyDeleteHow does Kevin Barrett know 3,000 were killed in the WTC on 9/11?
Do you really believe the Israelis et al would nuke the WTC with the tenants at work there most of whom were CIA and other government employees? Why are so many records missing on these people whose families received millions in government compensation?
Ellen Mariani's husband was alleged to be on flight UA175. Since we know there were no planes and no hijackings on 9/11, how could anyone have been killed on that flight?
Isn't it time to look at the evidence and decide what really happened or will this be another money-making conspiracy for would-be authors as in the JFK case?
All that happened was a controlled demolition. They wanted to destroy those buildings because they were obsolete and filled with asbestos. They decided to kill two birds with one stone by making the CD look like a terrorist attack.
History Requires Events Placed In CONTEXT
DeleteCompass: u bring up excellent questions, indeed.
(a) Not only were WTC bldgs. filled w. asbestos, but I understand the bldgs. were also corroded by the "galvanic" process, the aluminum cladding on the outside attached directly to the steel (setting-up a faint electric current, enhancing the rusting process).
WTC bldgs. were reputedly scheduled for demolishion, but it would have cost a billion dollars.
(b) Evidently some planes took-off w. people in them and didn't land anywhere, the people not hrd fm again. The perps needed to have SOME casualties, some people who actually disappeared, evidently.
(c) Note people don't "make money" writing books without offering some value, info, entertainment, or whatever.
(d) Israelis will do WHATEVER advances their interests, as they've demonstrated, w. all their assets, including the "Jews-media," and they evidently have calculated that one horrific incident will follow another, causing goyim suckers to forget about the previous incident--as now w. ebola plague threatening to turn into pandemic, etc.
So, as w. all historic events, eras, and episodes, history being (1) deterministic, (2) hence CYCLIC, u merely need put things in CONTEXT. This is era of hegemonic CENTRAL-BANKING, arising definitively fm Napoleonic era, owning EVERYTHING and nearly everyone.
There are sociologic-psychologic aspects too which I touch-upon above, satanic Jews & collaborators vs. Christians, most of the rest in the middle.
Note further, the Jew vs. Christian issue is parallel w. subjectivism and moralism/Pharisaism vs. the objective-determinist view. Most people are heavily affected and intimidated by moralism/Pharisaism--this is how their emotions are leveraged and manipulated--and Christians of today are still struggling against this moralistic/subjectivist circumstance.
Finally, observe 9/11, like JFK assassination and Sandy Hook fraud, is ANOTHER instance of the "BIG-LIE" whence people are intimidated to fooling themselves, fearing to face the alternative truth--like that their own gov. is criminal conspiracy.
Remember most people have great difficulty w. thinking--like regarding determinism vs. free will, central-banking, etc. Thus far Jew satanists have succeeded, but when US Dollar finally collapses they will lose their foremost practical weapon and it will be different ball-game--a different era.
apsterian said:
ReplyDelete"Evidently some planes took-off w. people in them and didn't land anywhere, the people not hrd fm again. The perps needed to have SOME casualties, some people who actually disappeared, evidently."
It's been established long ago no planes crashed anywhere on 9/11. Therefore, no passengers were killed.
The claim is 3,000 died because they were in the WTC unaware the buildings were wired for demolition. The nukes vaporized most of the people according to Fetzer, Fox and Duff.
False again, compass:
DeleteIt may be true no planes crashed, but evidently some people disappeared who were supposed to be on planes--regardless, this is what's reported which could all be false--it only goes to show then how pitifully un-reliable is the reporting on this large event.
That's gross non-sequitur: no planes crashed, but passengers could easily have been killed, obviously.
Delete"No Deaths" on 911 or Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon, etc is much easier overall and works just as well.
DeleteThe masses will believe whatever they are shown on TV. Most people won't even stop to think another version of the story exists - the media will ignore as well.
With no real deaths to report or investigate, no one gets charged or tried in a real court.
The scene is flooded with actors posing as witnesses and victims. The media is excluded - hoaxers supply their own crew. No real deaths means little chance of anyone leaking the truth - not even during a police/FBI investigation...because their has been no crime to investigate.
It also helps to have participants who are closely related / connected...especially when those connections are NGO's funded by deep pockets like the Rockefellers.
The JFK assassination research has been embellished with garbage thanks to a large number of fake eye witnesses played by actors.
Some people suggest that the assassination itself was fake. I have no reason to reject that claim...the "Theater of the Bizarre" has the same effect either way. It's almost not important. As long as the media ignores alternate views and / or presents the concept that those :deniers" are just crazy...and probably hate Jews or are racists, were a tinfoil hat, or questions what ever the masses believe....based on statistics pulled straight out of someone's ass.
apsterian said:
ReplyDelete"Note people don't "make money" writing books without offering some value, info, entertainment, or whatever."
That's right. These conspiracy books are nothing more than entertainment designed to mislead the public. \
Are you aware of Operation Mockingbird whereby the CIA has established its assets in every media outlet especially in the publishing business?
I'll bet 99% of books published on JFK are by CIA-friendly authors. And that goes for the so-called JFK researchers as well.
So what?--u have the typical Jew problem w. simple logic.
DeleteIf a book is written to mislead, this is worthy of exegesis by some other book. It's the large discussion then that's likely to present best account of actual truth, obviously.
Whole idea of free expression is that while lots of people may honestly try, only few will have the fullest, best account.
Note "CIA-friendly" means these people have most access to funds put out by Jew-controlled US Federal Reserve Bank (legalized) COUNTERFEIT scam. U make little sense.