"The Power Hour" interview on Sandy Hook
NB: 98 minutes
Friday, September 26, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
PLEASE SUPPORT REVERE RADIO:
SUBSCRIBE to the RSS feed
DONATE to Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
---------
(Right-click on guest name to download mp3)
SUBSCRIBE to the iTunes feed
STREAM premieres on Revere Radio
5pm CST (2300 GMT) M-W-F:
---
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2014
(158)
-
▼
September
(13)
- Gordon Duff, Jim Fetzer, Preston James
- Wolfgang Halbig, Joyce Reilly / Preston James
- Douglas Horne / New JFK Show #28
- Nick Kollerstrom / Wolfgang Halbig
- Paul Taylor
- Kathryn Forrester Thro / Larry Rivera
- Jim Fetzer
- Jim Fetzer / Dennis Cimino
- Meria Heller / Gary King
- Clare Kuehn
- Frater X
- Rick Adams / Gary King
- Ibrahim Soudy
-
▼
September
(13)
Excellent show. I like Preston's optimism, but tend to think that they will conceal the issues for decades. Perhaps Fast and Furious will gain widespread attention. Sadly, they will give 9/11 and Sandy Hook the JFK treatment to conceal and confuse.
ReplyDeleteHere's Ukrainian woman talking about her murdered son, 10 mins, observe how agitated she is thinking about as she tells the story, how frantic she is--she's not happy at all--and it happened little while ago--how UNLIKE the frauds at Sandy Hook who are soooo idiotically cheerful and smiling, the puke.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrvQ_4DBadM
freeride: I get mad at her thick-headedness too, but it was a legitimate comment for the contrast in emotional affect, u gotta admit, old bean.
DeleteFreeride will have no more free rides if he keeps up these insulting posts. NO MORE!
DeleteWatch your mouth, Freeride, or there will be NO MORE "free rides" for you on this blog site.
DeleteGreat show. The old grandma is a total fraud, moron and shill. I'm glad Prof. Fetzer didn't let her get away with her drivel. If the alleged daughter won't talk, granny's full of shit. Of course, the old bag suggests Keith Johnson & Michael Collins Piper because they are some of the leading proponents of this scam. 99% chance the old windbag is a New York Jew.
ReplyDeleteRight on, SW--Prof. Fetzer mentioned the FBI report saying ZERO deaths in Newtown for 2012--and the Jewwy old bag started stuttering like a moron, ho ho ho ho ho
DeleteAgain: Dr Jim may not have been aware that the UCR system which the FBI use is a feed; if Newtown didn't report their murders (still they could lie there), it would be a 0. It means the 0 could be a tacit acknowledgement from Newtown or the FBI that there were no deaths from the supposed massacre, or it could be a false lead.
DeleteClare: I think u suffer fm a false-brain--one that's absent. No one died at Sandy Hook--get a clue--and start thinking for once in ur life.
DeleteReal issue is how these BIG-LIES get by--what sort of a culture affords this sort of lying and fraud?--is it one that's dominated by Satanism and Satanists?--how could it not?
Clare may be unaware that I have addressed that issue in my latest article on Sandy Hook: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/28/sandy-hook-ct-crime-data-confirms-fbi-report-but-something-is-still-wrong-2/
DeleteNo, Jim, I hadn't seen that article.
DeleteApsterian: your comment is ridiculous re. me, however, re. no-one's having died at Sandy Hook, I tend to agree & have been a major proponent of that position. But Judy is quite real (from many considerations, including her old & very 9/11 Truther, but also homey Facebook page. She also, you will be happy to know, is no fan of Israel & seems to think the Jewish Holocaust main storyline is wrong (not that almost no-one died, but that causes of death & total numbers).
All: I will also mention here that though I am not going to reveal her full name & page, the main point I made was missed in people's overeager closed-mindedness. I was pointing to the fact that she has to have been lied to by her daughter, or her daughter whose son was scared was lied to by 2 families in Sandy Hook, or there was a dead child or two, in an op or by a cult & placed there.
The point is that in none of these scenarios does Judy herself have to be lying and if, on the outside chance, kids were holed up in the school at all that day, or in St Rose of Lima for its drill (with Judy's daughter lying to Judy about where son was), trauma would still occur.
Judy's daughter could have been in on the drill op but then learned (through the lies) that "kids had died". Or 1-2 kids could have.
See, we don't know how much was the lie. We don't know where the lie stops & people's trauma begins. But in none of these ideas does Judy's nervousness have to be a sign of her being a fraud.
However, I will not publicize her Facebook page, due to respect for her privacy.
barryb: USA and world suffer for people like u and ur horrific ignorance about Jews. Judaism is Satanism, and u'd better get a clue, buddy--ignorant people like u are the very problem.
ReplyDeleteFind out about the Talmudic war against gentiles at RevisionistReview.blogspot.com and Come-and-hear.com.
U're most dis-credited of all for ur gross ignorance
That show was a storm!
ReplyDeleteIt would appear that this kikejew/gungrab attempt is falling apart!.. Things don't seem to be going as plan for our beloved inbreeds nowadays. Ah well, things can only go downhill from now on for them =]
Thanks Fetzer!
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI told you so. Will Republicans use this against Obama in mid-terms? An October Surprise?
ReplyDeleteCRIME BEAT: Holder to Resign over Sandy Hook, Fast & Furious
Attorney General Eric Holder to Resign
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/attorney-general-eric-holder-resign/story?id=25752751
The typical Criminal Committee’s answer to “Mending Fences” Regime change, a Bush specialty when the heat is on and the crimes get beyond the management of a felon and traitor. The replacement has a clean slate and begins the process of continuity of crime and the global agenda.
FBI SAYS NO ONE KILLED AT SANDY HOOK
Agency publishes crime report showing “0” murders occurred in Newtown in 2012
http://www.infowars.com/fbi-says-no-one-killed-at-sandy-hook/
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/tables/8tabledatadecpdf/table-8-state-cuts/table_8_offenses_known_to_law_enforcement_by_connecticut_by_city_2012.xls#disablemobile
I laugh at the whole enchilada of bogus beans they pumped out of the anus of crISIS management. We can enjoy the day but need to keep the heat up, spreading the truth. It’s going to drop like the Market today. The bomb of Bullshit will fly. We have the CDC Whistleblower THompson and the Sandy Hoax to hang our hats on but this is a mere tip of the enormous iceberg and as we know according to the criminal global committee that iceberg is melting due to AGW. Enjoy!
Related
Sandy Hook: Money Shots only! In "911 & False Flag Operations"
The Sandy Hook Hoax Map In "911 & False Flag Operations"
Sandy Hook - The Documentary 2013 Official In "Covert Domestic Operations: FBI, BATF, ADL, SPLC"
http://profit.ndtv.com/market/global-index_dow-jones
ReplyDeleteWatch the rebound once the adjustment is set and the 17300 mark hit the skyfall may happen. Just in time for an October surprise and a very cold winter. Storing nuts is not a waste of time
Dollar high. – EU/US credit interest rate – Major sell-off
The rumblings of the quake?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/attorney-general-eric-holder-resign/story?id=25752751
By: Puddy Dunne on September 25, 2014
at 1:47 pm
According to Wolfgang Halbig this is the script writer for the hoax as indicated in the 11,000 page report on Sandy Hook.
Obsidian Analysis Homepage, Homeland Security Consulting | Washington DC
http://www.obsidiandc.com/
Any admission about Sandy Hook received by or through any media or government source should be suspect.
ReplyDeleteSince any usable admission is unlikely, the least we can get is an education - we're paying for it so we might as well get it.
For all past and future investigations we should keep in mind that....
1. Witnesses lie or have corrupted memories.
2. The media lies...more or less now than before? I know not - because my threshold for cognitive dissonance is very low. The amount spewing from all main stream and many alt sources makes my skin crawl...I can only take a few minutes per day.
3. Think like a hoaxer. Consider how one would plan on covering tracks. For instance....
In any large operation, filling the scene with people you know will give an eyewitness account that leads an investigator away from the truth should be an obvious preparation. You would want to crowd out anyone that you don't know.
In JFK's case, they took a route the public would not have expected...could the witnesses in the immediate area where the shooting took place have been plants? Could their suspicious deaths have been bullshit as well?
Same for 911....the whole area could have been flooded with "agents".
Sandy Hook - same thing. We have videos of an uninvited photographer at the firehouse be harassed by what appears to be a Greenberg.
Boston....same thing. The "stage blood pit" of simulated carnage was protected from intruders...just like when we film on location. We always use off duty cops to keep out the uninvited.
Bottom line...question all information...especially that which supports your first impression of a situation. Sandy Hook is such a pathetically weak production the American taxpayers should get a refund on the millions of dollars handed out in grants to Newtown.
Of all the areas America has slipped, the quality of our propaganda has really gone down hill the most.
Without good propaganda, how can any country expect to survive? Maybe that's the point.
As for Riley...go back in time and research her involvement in redirecting the investigation of Gulf War Syndrome and decide for yourself.
Excellent discussion.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the woman who claims to be the grand mother of one of the students at SH, I find it very interesting that her grandson was good friends with alleged victim Benjamin Wheeler. It has been established that Benjamin Wheeler's parents are both amateur actors - the mother Francine having appeared in a low budget sci-fi pornographic cartoon entitled "Mutant Aliens", and the father David Cole Wheeler having appeared in a low budget anti-gun movie, the name of which escapes me at the moment.
Also of particular interest is the fact that Francine (maiden name Lobis) was also special assistant to Democratic National Committee top fund raiser Maureen White. My My, isn't it something how these people get around?
Great videos addressing these troubling facts are -
"Sandy Hook Hoax - David and Francine Wheeler's Elite Connections - Maureen White, Steven Rattner"
by Paulstalservice
"Sandy Hook HOAX:Hello Francine LOBIS-Wheeler"
by The Ricoman1973
Mossad often dress up and pretend to be anti-Jew. Why would that be? It's something for all of us to think about.
ReplyDeleteJolly good show, old chap.
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work, apsterian!
Remember to keep your end up,
apsterian and don't let
the side down, old fruit!!
Ta ta for now!!
Bottoms up!!!!
Anyone for cricket?
Ho ho ho--Jason, u're same Jew w. a thousand names, aren't u? Ho ho ho
DeleteApsterian: your seeing of Zionist types has reached a fanatic level, where anyone is a "dis-honourary Jew" if you don't like their posts, or (in politics and social life) dislike their actions.
DeleteIt is one thing to point to real Zionist fanatics, showing how they get their material from the Talmud (or real Muslim or Christian fanatics getting or warping their beliefs from their books and traditions), but quite another to attribute all evil to one group and its influence on other groups, as well as bleed your thinking into other people who are not the same group or don't use holy books for the same thing the fanatics do.
You do bleed one idea into another. You also have never worked through the research (on JPM), but expect a specific broadcast (of mine) to give you all the info at once. The info is complex and spread out (except that my blog page has much in one place). Stop accusing others (me) of not providing info when you didn't go read.
DeleteClare: A Little "Touched" In Head
DeleteClare: u're just a liar, rather a little psycho too, I suspect, for ur incessant, idiotic babbling.
U can't even figure-out "bleeding ideas" needs some definition or explication and could use an example, too.
What "research"?--u either have evidence or not for ur PID thesis, and u don't say what it is, so only conclusion is u DON'T HAVE ANY, certainly nothing conclusive or substantial--and u do nothing to disprove this conclusion.
U had TWO HOURS to say something but just blathered and bloviated and yammered and jabbered in ur insufferable manner.
What's "complex" about showing how two diff. people are diff.?--ho ho ho ho U're just a little "touched" in the head, face it.
Evil or bad are words which can be used to mean not fully human integrated feelings and actions, not merely used to mean radical or spiritually real things.
DeleteSo, yes: you think the evildoers, bad types or whatever words you want to use, are mostly driven by or organized through Jewry (in your limited definition of that, in turn).
good grief....
DeleteFinally, logical consistency is not the name for what you're doing. You base your logic on improperly broad (bleeding) thinking and then consistently repeat it. That is generalization and fanaticism.
DeleteOf course the Federal Reserve is a scam.
Lots is complex about showing two similar people are different persons, when there is resistance. Camera, lighting, age are invoked to explain differences when people notice them, and they don't work to notice the same differences in images which have the differences less obvious but present.
DeleteHence, I went through how to know, in my last broadcast. You were not ready for that; you wanted to think you could just know, but wildly different looks would be too easily dismissed by someone like you in inadequate ways. Why? Because you would not take on what I said about how to notice the same differences in more similar shots.
Stop asserting I don't substantiate what I say. You have not worked through the substantiations. I do not give them in comments, esp. not on the last broadcast, which was about broader assistance in how to notice the differences and why JPM was killed.
DeleteYou wanted a few links -- and I remind people that a trick will trick you even with the empirical proofs in front of our face, because they'll be misinterpreted unless you know how to approach the trick.
DeleteClare KuehnSeptember 30, 2014 at 4:03 PM
Delete"Stop asserting I don't substantiate what I say. You have not worked through the substantiations."
U said, above, there are "substantiations"--so what are those again?--give the links or say what they are. Ho ho ho ho
And when u're informed ur "substantiations" are just babbling, u'll no doubt just say we lack the mystic proper manner of "working through" ur idiocy, ho ho ho ho
You have to know how to approach evidence or you miss the scientific issues.
DeleteBut also, you didn't work through the evidentiary material provided in all the other places.
The material is listed here:
Deletehttp://invanddis.proboards.com/thread/7714/clare-kuehn-research-paul-dead?page=1&scrollTo=110490
as I've told you multiple times. And how to approach it is in the broadcast you heard but were not ready for.
So, since this is not a page on this topic, leave it now, here, & do your own work on my work.
Clare: that's not evidence or proof for PID--u're pathetic.
DeleteThesis is there's 2 diff. people. So WHAT are the diff.s?--list them, then give the links which verify, short explanation if necessary.
If u can't do this, then u must admit u have no evidence, just speculation and wishful thinking.
Go to the Wired article & my blog.
DeleteWhat are the diff.s?--and what is the direct, sense-perceptory evidence to confirm?--give the links.
DeleteGo to the scientists & the blog. You are trying to narrowly define how you will know; you have faulty premises. There are differences people notice, but expressions change, too. So one has to get a sense of the longer face and orbital bones and nose of Sir Paul (or the poseur tendencies of his body language), and then see that the tendency in photos & film before late 1966 is not present, except when a specific pose is attained by Paul. Now: you go learn. Leave it here. This thread is not on Paul's death.
DeleteNo, u utterly psychotic moron: U'RE THE ONE W. "FAULTY PREMISES"--u have no proof; u just refuse to admit it, that's all. Ho ho ho ho ho
DeleteI said go to where the proof is. And learn how you would know a proof when it comes to similar people with doctored photos & different ages & some plastic surgery & camera lenses being part of the problem.
Deleteapsterian, cease the endless ad homs against Claire or I will take you out of the forum. I have had quite enough.
ReplyDelete
DeleteHow are they ad-homs if they're founded in the facts?--she's challenged to provide evidence which then she REFUSES or is un-able to provide. So what's conclusion?--she must be a fraud, this based on the facts, right?
And if she continues to insist there's evidence when it's obvious there isn't, that she doesn't have any, why isn't psychosis justified conclusion?
And note, above expo is in addition to her insisting my "premises are faulty," and it's my fault for not agreeing w. her false statements to effect there's evidence.
So it isn't ad hom--it's all justified--all u're doing is encouraging her.
And note the above extended dialogue as evidence for my conclusions and observations--(a) she has no evidence, (b) she cannot note or list any specific differences, (c) and she lies about other pt., alleging "surgery"--when there's no evidence for that, just her own wishful thinking or speculation.
Delete(d) Finally, there's the obvious babbling she does as she attempts to excuse her inability and attack the interlocutor who merely asks for the evidence. It ain't ad hominem--it's the honest to gosh truth.
ap: you don't go to where the evidence is, or work to learn how the evidence comes together & its problems, so you can learn to overcome perceptual tricks.
DeleteThe thing is, the woman, Judy, who phoned in, is apparently a piano teacher in NYC. It cannot be that hard to establish if she is real. She must have a last name and a phone number. Joyce Riley must have some of that information. There cannot be that many piano teachers in NY of her age (60+) named Judy. She has apparently submitted a 911 article to Rense. I just searched the Rense website, and could not located an article submitted there by a Judy who matched this woman's profile.
ReplyDeleteThere are two options. The first is that she is telling the truth. It is possible. It is not likely, but it is possible that that the school was open that day and that there was an event there that did result in the deaths of children, and that this woman's grandson was photographed with one of the children who died that day. Are there class lists for Sandyhook anywhere to cross reference?
2. She is a shill and a liar. In that case she is either mentally ill and making things up - there are people like that, or she is working for the folks who did it. There is not enough information at this point to say which alternative - crazy or operative, is true.
The first step would be to establish if she really exists, and from there is what she says is true or not, and if not, is she crazy or is she an operative. The clever way she deflected an question that would have established her story suggested that she is a liar of some sort. But let's get that info rather than arguing about things we can't know yet.
You can hear the script fade in and out as she tries to keep in character...
ReplyDeleteShe can't pull it off. Total fraud.
There was a study saying that internet discussions which degenerate into name calling serve to discredit the information being discussed, and cause people to tune out. This is consistent with common sense. I think we should all be skeptical of those who use this technique.
ReplyDeleteThe nice thing about free speech is you don't have to listen to it.
DeleteWho is it who's got the money to pay shills and "trolls" to come on and do the name-calling?--JEWS AND ONLY JEWS.
DeleteBarryb: of course you're right; people who do not distinguish between the evildoers (Jewish or not) and the average people (of any type) who are not as literalist or not interpreting most things the same way as evildoers, do not help any discussion.
ReplyDeleteYou're barking mad, pal.
ReplyDeleteProfessor Fetzer IS great though; I've got to agree with you on that one. And Wolfgang is just tremendous.
Now I don't know Jim personally, and I'd hate to make false assumptions, but I suspect Jim thinks you're a bit of a clown.
Feel free to prove me wrong however.
Ho ho ho--presumes I give a shit (well, too much more than that, ho ho ho) what Fetzer thinks, ho ho ho ho
DeleteOf course you care what Professor Fetzer thinks.
ReplyDeleteWho are you trying to kid, you great big schmuck?
Dickless turd.
DeleteNice to meet you too, Steven.
ReplyDeleteI honestly think you both discredit the grave seriousness of the issues at hand here with your aggressive anti-Semitism and juvenile insults. You read like a couple of semi-illiterate ten-year-olds. Come on, sort it out, the pair of you. Calling someone a "dickless turd" or a "Jewwy queer" in a discussion regarding the likelihood of a staged school shooting does no credit to yourselves or the work of Professor Fetzer & Wolfgang et all.
I mean it. It's really sad.
Maybe the Talmud does teach war against Gentiles. I don't know, I'm not familiar with it.
DeleteBut I'm familiar enough with The Bible. And how it teaches vindictiveness; ethnic cleansing; misogynism; homophobia; racism; infanticide; genocide; slave-holding; the list goes on. The Christian holy scripture's hardly much better is it, old son?
So nigel, we see u have superficial grasp of Biblic lit.; what then do u advocate?
DeleteNo, I'm very much an expert on the subject, my angry friend.
ReplyDeleteRight--so what then do u advocate, as I asked.
DeleteAs opposed to what? What do I advocate as opposed to the teachings of nine centuries'-worth of cobbled-together, disjointed documents, composed by crude, uncultured humans and then later revised, translated, distorted and 'improved' by hundreds of anonymous authors, editors and copyists?
ReplyDeleteWhat a thing to ask!
Just for five minutes stop insulting and start using your brain and arguing. You're looking increasingly more pathetic.
ReplyDeleteAnd stop typing "ho ho ho" in every damn thing you post. Who are you? Kris Kringle?
We continue to observe u have NOTHING to say of any substance about anything--just pretending u're judge of what's "cultured," ho ho ho.
DeleteWhat on earth are you talking about, Kringle? Are you making reference to my remark about the writers of three-and-a-half thousand year-old scriptures being "crude, uncultured humans"? Well then if you think I'm wrong, argue it properly with a sensible, reasoned response and stop insulting and arguing like a Pre-school child.
DeleteKringle, you're utterly hopeless at conversation or debate of any kind and you epitomise stupidity, especially in its nastiest forms of racism and superstition.
DeleteThank you, Kringle. My case in point.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletehe name of that caller "grandma Judy" probably refers to the 1981 record « Judy Garland - Annie Get Your Gun » from Sandy Hook records, it's the soundtrack of a 1949 musical. More info: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtkUmf8MGH8 and http://www.discogs.com/Judy-Garland-Annie-Get-Your-Gun/release/4863551
ReplyDelete