Paul McCartney's Son Says Paul Died in 1966
Monday, August 15, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
PLEASE SUPPORT REVERE RADIO:
SUBSCRIBE to the RSS feed
DONATE to Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
---------
(Right-click on guest name to download mp3)
SUBSCRIBE to the iTunes feed
STREAM premieres on Revere Radio
5pm CST (2300 GMT) M-W-F:
---
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2016
(101)
-
▼
August
(8)
- Academic Freedom Conference II Session 2: Stephen ...
- Academic Freedom Conference II: Session 1: Francis...
- The Great Moon Landing Hoax with Dennis Cimino
- Katherine Hine on The Murphy Mental Health Bill
- US Journalist files human rights petition with IACHR
- Paul McCartney's Son Says Paul Died in 1966
- Beyond The Veil with Raphaelle O'Neil/The Whistle ...
- Jim Fetzer and Gary King on Battle of New Orleans ...
-
▼
August
(8)
Look, folks, it takes all of a half an hour to look at some boyhood photos and understand that Paul and Mike McCartney were/are twins, and each stepped in and out of the role of "Paul" until 1990 or so, when Mike took over for good. Don't be misled by Mike McGear, he was someone else inserted to allow the twin, Mike, to leave his life and become the other Paul. That's all that is going on. Twins. Fetzer knows this but as a spook is told to keep the psy-op going as long as possible, a nice distraction. It's all there, easily discoverable and understood. Paul/Mike McCartney, twins, each played "Paul" at various times. (it was original Paul in the movie Hard Day's Night, and Mike in Help!)
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteYou are mistaken.
Deleteyou don't mention the 9/13/66 car crash where news was released about Paul in a car crash. If Paul (current) is the father of these paternity suits then why doesn't the dna match? If he's a twin it should match. The Halliday Paul does look like he could be the real Paul. But he looks short unless that woman is over 5'10". And doesn't anyone know what this Halliday does with his life and his comings and goings? Someone living in the area has to know. It still doesn't account for all the mystery. There isn't reason enough to cover up a death. there are still lots of things that don't add up. what ever happened to the gal that dated the real Paul (shorter paul with the better voice) People in LIverpool would know. People that have lived there all their lives.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteBeing that the CIA developed fast acting soft tissue cancer in the early sixties it would seem that is how Steve's mother died. They were working hand in hand with Tavistock to create the hippie.
ReplyDeleteWhat would be wrong with the title faux Paul?
I just started listening to this and right out of the blocks Paul's "son" says that he was born in July of 1967, months before Paul supposedly died. I remind you that the title of your show is "Paul McCartney's Son Says Paul Died in 1966". Well, he just said he died in 1967. Which one is it? I know the general consensus is that Paul died in 1966. Speaking of 1966, the two side by side photos that you have posted on your blog as both being taken in 1966 are in fact from 1964 and 1969 which is why, in your words, the photo of Paul on the left "has a decidedly younger appearance" and the photo on the right "presents a more mature countenance." In scientific terms that you should be able to understand, Mr. Fetzer, he looks younger on the left because he IS younger and he looks more mature on the right because he is 5 years older than he was in the photo on the left. I know you know this and you have knowingly presented this false "evidence" to your gullible fans. Science? The science of lying.
ReplyDeleteYou are mistaken.
DeleteOK. Just backed it up to the beginning. He said he was conceived not long before his (Paul) death. I stand corrected. Am I the only one who thinks he could be George Harrison's son? He looks more like him. Don't get me wrong. I don't believe it. I'm just sayin'. Of course whatever you want to believe is your truth for yourself. Believe it, and it's true.
DeleteSo, this guy claims he was visited by the "Beatles" when he was 7 years old. That, by his own math, since he says he was born in July of 1967 would have been at least july of 1974. The Beatles broke up in April of 1970. Am I to believe that the Fab Four reunited 4 years later simply to show up at this kid's house? Why? I'll tell you what,.. if the Beatles showed up at my house when I was 7, I would remember every microscopic detail! Ok…sure…….
ReplyDeleteI believe Stephen Dickinson's testimony.
ReplyDeleteLike I said, if you believe it, it's true.
DeleteStephen Dickinson is without
Deletedoubt the son of Mr Spock.
Stephen has Mr Spock's ears and also has that Vulcan look - the hair, eyes and mouth. Stephen Dickinson is beyond doubt Mr Spock's son. Stephen appeared alongside his real life father Leonard Nimoy and screen father Mr Spock in the original Star Trek in 1966 (age 6). Stephen went on to play other roles in Star Trek usually as an alien dressed in various costumes. In one of his most famous acting performances Stephen played the part of a radioactive jam butty on planet Judy.
Stephen is perhaps best remembered for his early Diddy Man years in Knotty Ash.
Star Date -307668.1
DeleteQagh SoH. Stephen tlhIngan mung.
You are mistaken. Stephen is of Klingon origin.
Star Trek and the Beatles….. Both 60s' phenomenons… Coincidence?
ReplyDeleteHmmm....Interesting.
ReplyDeleteYou could be onto something here.
Was Paul McCartney replaced
by renegade Vulcans and
Stephen cloned by surly Klingons?
Nothing is real.
Think about it.....
Well, Paul and Spock had the same general haircut so I would have to say this this is a slam dunk. Mr. Fetzer, are you on board yet?
ReplyDeleteAll Sounds very plausible.
ReplyDeleteBut where do the Cardassians
and the Borg fit in?
Answer that.
Get a load of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OptLgGtZ9_E
Mr Spock laying down those
jam session vibes! In 1969!!
Suddenly it all makes sense.
I'm sold. Next topic….
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApBTNDKoX6c&index=6&list=WL
ReplyDeleteat 2:22 is someone living at Paul's home. Who is he? Has anyone talked to him? I find it hard to believe there are no people to talk to. Paul had classmates did he not? He graduated from high school, did he not? What about church? Places he worked? Someone is still around. You make no mention about the news breaking in Liverpool the night of September 13, 1966. (the night the first episode of The Monkees appeared on US TV and had the news blurb. No newspaper people you can talk to in the US or England? No paramedics in England? No hospital personnel? You need to get a good investigator on this story. Someone like Jim Marrs.
It's really a shame if Paul did die. That means everything the Beatles did after words is sadly and mourning of his life and a tragedy spilled upon the fans whether they knew it or not. There is no reason to hide someone's death like this.
I believe steven. Over the years hollywood has been on strange things...like jennifer hudson family being murdered and acting as if everything is ok. Or whitney houston and her daughter dying the same way. Brittany murphy and her husband dead the same way....anna nicole smith and her son...c'mon people wake up. Hollywood is satanic. Why else do writers' and singers keep leaving clues in there work? Seriously I'm done with hollywood...this is just sad.
ReplyDeleteA couple of things raised a red flag. I don't think a mother would have a conversation with a seven year old and say that she "didn't throw herself at Paul McCaertney."
ReplyDeleteHe claimed that when the four Beatles visited including 'Faul', Stephen aged 7, whose mother had passed on, said to Lennon "You will never get away with it." Sounds like fantasy to me - but still open to the possibility of a Faul/Paul conspiracy....I also struggle to see a resemblence
See my reply below about resemblance.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYou are mistaken.
DeleteThe resemblance is closer to other close members of the family: Mary McCartney (Paul's mother), and Mike McCartney (Paul's brother). The resemblance comparison with the latter is available now at the link in the description below the video (the link being http://youcanknowsometimes.blogspot.ca/2016/07/stephen-dickinson-and-3-other-legal_28.html ). It's the first one on the page anyway, long before the others. The slide is cached at https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-DQfLtSUayzw/V7UUYRwmubI/AAAAAAAAEto/pe3zoLFPFOo5LcnH3aru1Bw4cNsU_meNwCLcB/s1600/Stephen%2Bplausible%2B1.png .
ReplyDeleteThe" Spock" comparison mentioned by some people above is due to Stephen Dickinson's widow's peak's having increased with male pattern baldness at the temples.
His resemblance with Paul is in his slight frame, his brown hair and eye and relatively round head, and his left handedness. It's also in his children more.
' The" Spock" comparison mentioned by some people above is due to Stephen Dickinson's widow's peak's having increased with male pattern baldness at the temples.'
DeleteHow dare you be so insulting to Stephen!
Stephen does not look like Spock. Your references to Stephen's alleged "widow's peak" and his "male pattern baldness " are offensive in the extreme.
I shall be sending Stephen an email informing him of your despicable comments on this blog.
Shame on you, Clare Kuehn!!
You are mistaken.
DeleteHilarious!!!
DeleteLOL LOL LOL LOL
A LORRA LORRA LAUGHS!!!
PAUL IS ALIVE!!!
"relatively round head"
DeleteROFLMFAO
Stephen Dickinson has said that he wants his pubic hair with roots back that were stolen from him for so-called
ReplyDeleteDNA testing by certain unsavory and sleazy characters who promote the lie that Paul McCartney is dead.Stephen has now changed his mind and has said he categorically is not Paul McCartney's son and that he was forced to say he was Paul's son by someone using the
alias "mclarekuehn" on a website dedicated to discussion of the
‘Paul is dead’ myth.
https://www.beatlesbible.com/features/paul-is-dead/
I fail to see the connection
ReplyDeletebetween widows' peaks, male
pattern baldness, Spock and
Stephen Dickinson.
Is Clare Kuehn mentally ill?
You are mistaken.
ReplyDeleteHilarious!!!
ReplyDeleteLOL LOL LOL LOL
A LORRA LORRA LAUGHS!!!
PAUL IS ALIVE!!!
شركة قمة الدقة للخدمات المنزلية
ReplyDeleteشركة تسليك مجارى بالدمام
شركة تسليك مجارى بالخبر
شركة تنظيف منازل بالاحساء
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالاحساء
Paul was murdered in 1966 by members of the deep state. There was a news advert during the Monkees TV show."A Beatle involved in a fatal accident, more at 11". But nothing was said. No news on a Beatle in an accident. It was hushed up before it was news.
ReplyDeleteThere is too much involved with the Beatles and people dismiss it. They don't want to admit their idols are involved with Satanism, the Occult and secret societies. Even when their idols say their talents are not that good, people don't want to hear it. They'd rather believe a lie and hype than truth.
Even when this guy admits who he is, people still won't believe it.
I was in 5th grade when I turned on the TV to watch the Monkees program and saw the news mentioned, that there has been a terrible accident involving one of the Beatles, and that there would be more information that night. The news that never came.
DeleteI remember this. Lived near DC. I believe that it was a Monkees rerun, first episode.
Duane Damage is correct.
,