Wellstone, Sandy Hook and more with "Live Mike"
NB: 150 minutes
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
PLEASE SUPPORT REVERE RADIO:
SUBSCRIBE to the RSS feed
DONATE to Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
---------
(Right-click on guest name to download mp3)
SUBSCRIBE to the iTunes feed
STREAM premieres on Revere Radio
5pm CST (2300 GMT) M-W-F:
---
not only are you depriving us of fresh podcast, but when presented with a new one, the fucking thing does not DL. Are you trying to demoralize us Fetzer?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteTotal tells me it's been fixed. Many thanks.
DeleteThank you! =)
DeleteSnowden is not a hero Fetzer. He revealed nothing new. It's a limited hangout op to put it all on Obama since he started to hesitate over Syria and it will be used to channel outrage towards a preconceived "solution" which will be a walled off internet and some version of CISPA.
ReplyDeleteOn the contrary, no one would have taken the existence of a massive surveillance program to heart were it not for Edward Snowden. It is a hyper-sophisticated ploy to suggest that he has not made a difference--alerting the whole world to the fact that NSA has been spying on them, which is a gross violation of privacy, a lack of trust in our allies, and a breach of our 4th amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure.
DeleteReal whistleblowers don't become instant media celebrities. They could have killed him before he said anything if he were legit. Or they could have ignored him. Instead they hyped him from day one. Greenwald, a man calling for the ouster of Assad, supported the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars as well as the Patriot Act, is the man Snowden chose to give his story to. Let's see, a reporter calling for Obama to be more aggressive against Syria is the guy who breaks a story embarrassing to Obama when Obama won't commit to war. The "whistleblower" reveals nothing new, just stuff known for more than a decade. Greenwald is then set up with a new media empire funded by the owner of Ebay, Pierre OMidyar, who just happens to be lobbying for CISPA. When you look at the protests surrounding this and the content of what Snowden and Greenwald are saying, it's pretty vague, but sounds like they want to "reform" the system and that it should be "transparent". So basically, spying is okay to them, just as long as we know about it. Countries are now calling for walling off the internet, which if this happens will be the death of the internet as we've known it.
Deleteyoure wrong. snowden is completely 1000% legit and your narcissistic cynicism exposes your mental limitations. get out more.
Deletelet me use my nostradamic skillz here and guess... YOU HAVE A TV!.. and NO, batman is not going to save you either stevie.
DeleteActually I'm more a marvel fan and 4 televisions.. Flat screens. Say hello to your mother for me.
Deletestevie.t
DeleteTonight is not a-digging-up-his-mother night. Ask Freeride the next full moon. On the other hand, if you talk to the ass rim nicely.....he just might take you with him on a guided moonlit tour.
Who knows?
@Fetzer: It is a ploy to suggest that Snowden has not made a difference? How so? Why a ploy? That is a remarkable assertion which requires some delineation of supposed motive and, lacking evidence, at least some theoretical basis for your belief that it is a ploy.
DeleteAnyway, Chris is right I believe. Here are my reasons for thinking so:
http://saveourcola.wordpress.com/2013/06/16/some-brief-thoughts-on-the-snowden-affair/
And here are Naomi Wolf's:
https://www.facebook.com/notes/naomi-wolf/my-creeping-concern-that-the-nsa-leaker-is-not-who-he-purports-to-be-/10151559239607949
We could be wrong, but at least Chris, Naomi, and I are offering arguments.
Here's a must-read piece about Snowden particularly and Psy-Ops generally:
Deletehttp://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/06/18/309609/how-to-identify-cia-limited-hangout-op/
And here's a video from Webster Tarpley:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU70WdLt_BM
@Stevie.t
DeletePlease elaborate. How am I wrong and mentally limited? I would have thought the guy who's reply amounted to a temper tantrum, a little five year old sticking his fingers in his ears and essentially saying, "Snowden is 1000% legit. Na na na boo boo, I can't hear you," is the guy with mental limitations. Also my guess would be the guy posting infowars links is the one who's analysis is lacking but I could be wrong. Please tell me why you feel he's legit.
Because I'm a member of the illuminati and he's not on the guest list.
DeleteI used to be a member of the illuminati but they kicked me out. It seems I just wasn't bright enough. The whole episode kinda took the shine off things for me. Maybe some illuminati member in here could throw some light on things and enlighten me on what exactly I did wrong. Those illuminnati are dull bunch of thugs anyway. They take everything so fucking seriously!
DeleteThat's my excuse, anyway.
Go dig up your mother again like I told you.
DeleteYou cunt.
Jim.
ReplyDeleteAwesome interview again and finally some more people seeing that the zapruder film was altered.Hope your'e getting some interest in the painstaking research you've done into this obvious hoax.
http://www.infowars.com/oliver-stone-zapruder-film-was-altered/
Chris Said: Real whistleblowers don't become instant media celebrities. They could have killed him before he said anything if he were legit. Or they could have ignored him. Instead they hyped him from day one.
ReplyDelete~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Exactly! Anything that gets media attention these days is suspect and anyone working for the media, Oracle, like Herzog is suspect.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
? Lee Rogers of Oracle Broadcasting Insults 911 No Planers - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQ3Sw8asylc
"It's not important whether there were planes or no planes."......Lee Rogers, a gatekeeper?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Truth Exposed about Occupy - the NWO - and who was behind it - PART 2/9 - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K4hxN_St5I
Actors at demonstrations. One was girl from show Millionaire. Matchmaker.
P.S. Here's a real whistleblower. Who ever heard of him and who knew about JM Wave?
ReplyDeleteNew Book: THE ZENITH SECRET by Captain Bradley E. Ayers ...
Jul 31, 2007 - New Book: THE ZENITH SECRET by Captain Bradley E. Ayers ... identify Gordon Campbell as deputy station chief at JM/Wave (the CIA Miami station), ... Ayers reports at length on Gordon Campbell's Man Friday at JM Wave .
Chris said :"Snowden is not a hero Fetzer. He revealed nothing new. It's a limited hangout op ...."
ReplyDeleteSounds about right.
Jon Rappoport speculated that this is really about a turf war/funding war between the CIA [ who Snowden probably still works for] and the NSA, with the CIA being miffed at the amount of stolen and counterfeit cash going to the NSA these days.
Regards, onebornfree.
Rappaport makes a lot of good points deconstructing the Snowden narrative timeline but I think he misses the forest for the trees when it comes to the reasoning for the op. It has to do with weakening Obama as well as pushing legislation like CISPA. People who are blinded by their hatred of Obama (not that I support him) have a hard time seeing this.
DeleteProfessor James Fetzer!
ReplyDeleteGet this homophobic, necrophiliac body snatcher and grave robber, Freeride outta here!!
oh stop crying, and go back to being 'Laurence Duval' you twit. Mind you, it's not going to change your moronic, unimaginative comments no matter what handle you choose, and the 'dig your mother' joke has made quite an impression you, but some readers might not know the context and may just think that you are a sick puppy. So try and use your imagination abit more. Besides, some readers get a kick out of watching me slap you around with my keyboard, so here is a kleenex for your >nose< and stop wining ffs.
DeleteSnowden is certainly an operative working for the bad guys. Their plan is simple. They want to discredit the entire system, the CIA, the NSA, the FBI, the office of the President, the Congress, the Senate... everything. They are doing a very good job of it. The people are very fed up and would love to see the whole system tossed out. And they will get their wish. A military coup is obviously planned. Then the new leaders will promise that all will be returned to normal in due time, they will say that they had to step in to stop all the corruption... is this not obvious?
ReplyDeleteThey will even expose Obama for being a fake, they will even expose the fact that the Bush administration was behind 911, all of these truths will come out.... as a convincing pretext and explanation as to why the military coup was necessary.
Create the problem and then offer the people the solution.
agreed for the most part stooy44, but what makes you think there are no good guys? the lower we have been brought down, the higher we will be raised up!
ReplyDeletethe IS(I)S will crash and burn soon. all the fakery is being exposed!
http://www.scmagazine.com.au/News/363578,stuxnet-infected-russian-nuclear-plant.aspx
'kaspersky' eh? as in kasper (the friendly ghost) in the sky! the new 'call of duty' game is called 'ghosts' and features the destruction of the IS(I)S! Michael Jackson is another friendly ghost!
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=720 Fakery in Orbit: THE I$$
regarding alex jones, pete santilli...the world's a stage and each man has his role.
The power-players behind the curtain rarely conduct their shadowy moves in lockstep. There are always factions within (and against) factions. Assange/Manning/Snowden/Greenwald all have nothing useful to say or reveal about 9/11 or Israeli duplicity -- but they DO represent a faction that is obviously intent on replacing the Democrat feeders-at-the-trough with the Republican hogs... UNLESS the Dems okay another "war for the Jews" in the Mideast. And the upshot of the NSA revelations (perhaps after the planned "Cyber-9/11" is staged) will be a general, grudging/numbing "acceptance" of electronic privacy as a quaint relic of a distant past. Come on Jim. Didn't you learn, very early in your long life, that when something seems too good to be true (like the New York Times giving acres of coverage to an honest whistleblower) -- is IS too good to be true!
ReplyDelete