Monday, November 25, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
PLEASE SUPPORT REVERE RADIO:
SUBSCRIBE to the RSS feed
DONATE to Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
---------
(Right-click on guest name to download mp3)
SUBSCRIBE to the iTunes feed
STREAM premieres on Revere Radio
5pm CST (2300 GMT) M-W-F:
---
Dennis Cimino has asked me to post this on his behalf:
ReplyDeleteWith regarding the McQueen interview, the key similarities of the ‘one / two’ punch that was used to keep the sheeple in the United States in a state of ‘terror’ long enough to push thru the way way in advance written PATRIOT ACT (ENABLING ACT) in the aftermath of 9/11. Therefore, the ANTHRAX attack had to come because the two key targets, who were Daschle and Leahy, were both ‘shut up’ just long enough to push the main objective forth, which was the subjugation of the U.S. under draconian laws that in effect, ENDED THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC fully in the aftermath of the 9/11 false flag attack, most assuredly needed the overkill that needed to occur to push the nation willingly over the abyss into the QAEDA that they were being told was responsible for these crimes.
McQueen rightfully has pointed the finger at ISRAHELL in the ‘anthrax attack’ and rightfully so. Israel was the PRIME MOVER on 9/11, as they were in the JFK assassination, and therefore, before some of you out there, especially ATLANTA BILL who likes to blame NAZISM for everything from fallen arches to beri beri as a causative factor, versus the ZIONIST reasons, we now have effectively confirmed that the case can be reasonably made that the real; “ONE / TWO blow” to America goes back to the first ISRAELI kill on U.S. soil, on November 22nd. 1963.
As the anthrax that was used in the false flags was right out of Ft. Detrick, and was really from Dr. Zack, not Hatfield as the government wrongly accused, means that the people who did both of these DEATH BLOWS to the United States, and ostensibly ENDED the more than 230 year long experiment in alleged ‘democracy’ here, turns out to both have been dealt to the United States not just by collaborators in the CIA and the U.S. military industrial complex and the A.I.P.A.C. owned Congress and Senate, replete with many Zionist traitors who put ISRAEL FIRST over the public they allegedly serve but do nothing but rape and pillage and cornhole….then once again, per this excellent show, it is pretty clear that the core driving force between these two not so very isolated events but in time itself, were in fact, ISRAEL.
http://youtu.be/QgwpwqGVmGw
ReplyDeleteTHE TERM CONSPIRACY THEORY FIRST APPEARED IN THE WAKE OF JFK ASSASSINATION
ReplyDeletehttp://memoryholeblog.com/2013/01/20/cia-document-1035-960-foundation-of-a-weaponized-term/
DEALING WITH "CONSPIRACY THEORIES
CIA Document 1035-960:
“Countering Criticism of the Warren Commission Report,”
CIA Document 1035-960 was released in response to a 1976 FOIA request by the New York Times. The directive is especially significant because it outlines the CIA’s concern regarding “the whole reputation of the American government” vis-à-vis the Warren Commission Report. The agency was especially interested in maintaining its own image and role as it “contributed information to the [Warren] investigation.”
The memorandum lays out a detailed series of actions and techniques for “countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries.” For example, approaching “friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors)” to remind them of the Warren Commission’s integrity and soundness should be prioritized. “[T]he charges of the critics are without serious foundation,” the document reads, and “further speculative discussion only plays in to the hands of the [Communist] opposition.”
The agency also directed its members “[t]o employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose.”
1035-960 further delineates specific techniques for countering “conspiratorial” arguments centering on the Warren Commission’s findings. Such responses and their coupling with the pejorative label have been routinely wheeled out in various guises by corporate media outlets, commentators and political leaders to this day against those demanding truth and accountability about momentous public events.
*No significant new evidence has emerged which the [Warren] Commission did not consider.
*Critics usually overvalue particular items and ignore others.
*Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal in the United States.
*Critics have often been enticed by a form of intellectual pride: they light on some theory and fall in love with it.
*Oswald would not have been any sensible person’s choice for a co-conspirator.
*Such vague accusations as that “more than ten people have died mysteriously” [during the Warren Commission’s inquiry] can always be explained in some natural way e.g.: the individuals concerned have for the most part died of natural causes.
Today more so than ever news media personalities and commentators occupy powerful positions for initiating propaganda activities closely resembling those set out in 1035-960 against anyone who might question state-sanctioned narratives of controversial and poorly understood occurrences. Indeed, as the motives and methods encompassed in the document have become fully internalized by intellectual workers and operationalized through such media, the almost uniform public acceptance of official accounts concerning unresolved events such as the Oklahoma City Murrah Federal Building bombing, 9/11, and most recently the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, is largely guaranteed......
Graeme MacQueen spoke about the recent trend in Canada to consider criticism of official government versions of events "thought crimes" as in "Holocaust denial. How soon before it happens here?
ReplyDeleteI deliberately pay no attention to people who are on the Consensus 9/11 Panel no matter how much solid information they convey, and Dr. MacQueen is.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.consensus911.org/
Consensus 9/11: The 9/11 Best Evidence Panel
Here are this panel's members..
http://www.consensus911.org/panel-members/
I regard this Panel as being a total misdirection to keep our focus away from where it needs to be – same old, age old CIA technique.
This Panel is made up of what I call the “mainstream” part of the co-opted “9-11 truth movement.”
One does not come to the best evidence and the best truth by the Delphi Technique.
Here is a great description of how these people operate by Craig Ranke of the Citizen Investigation Team.
http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/2/DC-911-Truth-Conference-2013-CIT-Statement
DC 9/11 Conference
Statement by Craig Ranke & Citizen Investigation Team
July 31, 2013