From the inside on A&E911
NB: Corrected file uploaded
Friday, October 4, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
PLEASE SUPPORT REVERE RADIO:
SUBSCRIBE to the RSS feed
DONATE to Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
---------
(Right-click on guest name to download mp3)
SUBSCRIBE to the iTunes feed
STREAM premieres on Revere Radio
5pm CST (2300 GMT) M-W-F:
---
Unfortunately, last segment of show is missing and replaced by OneBornFree interview.
ReplyDeleteMr. Graham seems quite sincere, and by the way made an excellent guest and informant, but basically he still "believes in" the good intentions of the Nanothermite Gang (NG).
Important article, (and reader comments,) by Dr. Morgan Reynolds...
http://nomoregames.net/2012/01/14/collapse-of-the-thermite-thesis/
See my commnets on two different VeteransToday articles...
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/10/03/the-complete-midwest-911-truth-conference-parts-1-2-and-3/
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/10/12/rethink911-revealing-truths-dispelling-lies/comment-page-1/#comment-506728
DISHONEST is the operative word when talking about Dr. Steven Jones' and Mr. Richard Gage's Nanothermite Gang entities and strategies.
dishonest is when you flakes act like you know what you are talking about .http://www.technologyreview.com/news/403624/military-reloads-with-nanotech/?a=f
DeleteNiels Harrit himself said that it would take between 27,000 - 144,000 metric tons of nanothermite to destroy a Twin Tower. And the flash would have been visible from Rome. Obviously that didn't happen. It takes more than 1 gram of nanothermite to destroy 1 gram of steel. It would have taken TRUCKLOADS of nanothermite to destroy a Twin Tower. It takes a detonation velocity of 6.100 meters per second to explode steel. Show us some documentation that nanothermite can actually explode steel.
DeleteThe WTC buildings were nuked. The USGS dust samples show that ternary fission took place at Ground Zero. 9/11 was a nuclear event. Steve Jones is full of it.
Did you read the article, cave buster bomb, more powerful that MOABS. I don't care what Niels Harrit says I am showing you the facts from a respected technology source. Neither he or you or anyone have any clue what the military has but his calculations in no way take into account what is being described in this article.
DeleteIn addition Don if you had read the article you would see on page 2 that they are using nano-technology to make very small nuclear bombs that so small that it is hard to detect that a nuclear explosion occurred. My point is not to say that a nano-thermite based mixture was used to blow up the buildings but only to counter the constant claims that nano-thermite could not be an explosive when the article clearly states that it can be engineered into a extremely powerful explosive. They could have used nukes and this article actually adds more credence to that theory since they can nano engineer the fissionable material into the nano-technology.
DeleteHow does nanothermite in any form account for zinc showing up in one of the USGS dust samples at 2,990 parts per million?
DeleteWas the high level localized to just one sample? Are you trying to say the presence of zinc is some kind of marker for a nuclear blast? clarify
DeleteTypically with uranium-235 fission the uranium nucleus will split into 2 unequal fragments with the average mass of the fragments around mass 95 and 137. True ternary fission produces three nearly equal-sized charged fragments (Z ~ 30) but only happens in about 1 in 100 million fission events.
DeleteMost of the dozen USGS dust samples contained 1,000 to 2,000 ppm of zinc. The WTC01-02 sample had nearly 3,000 ppm. This high level of zinc indicates that ternary fission took place at Ground Zero.
yea but you have to take into account that both towers had a galvanic corrosion problem between the aluminum panels and the steel. Putting a zinc coating between the two dis-similar metals common, this also could be the source of the excess zinc? Just a alternative theory to consider
DeleteYou can't look at these elements individually. The USGS samples show a dozen elements rising and falling predictably over a dozen sample locations according to known nuclear relationships.
DeleteZinc really stands out when you study this stuff. Zinc and barium have a direct relationship as do copper and zinc. Per Jeff Prager's PP:
the Zinc and Barium concentrations are closely related and if we exclude what must have been an extraordinary event at WTC01-16 as an outlier, the correlation is very good. The Product Moment Correlation Coefficient is 0.96. The concentration of Zinc is now 3 times the concentration of Barium but the correlation between Zinc and Strontium is not so clear, showing that the relationship must be more indirect. This is to be expected since Barium and Strontium are produced by different nuclear fission pathways.
In spent nuclear fuel, Strontium is found as Strontium Oxide (SrO) – the Strontium produced by the nuclear fission explosion under the Twin Towers will certainly have been oxidized to SrO by the heat. SrO is extremely soluble in water, so some of the Strontium concentration results obtained may have been distorted by the rain water which fell on New York a few days after the towers were destroyed.
There is a very strong linear relationship between Barium and Zinc found at the World Trade Center. This may indicate that a closely related nuclear sub-process gave rise to them, which produced 3 times as much Zinc as Barium by weight. If so, that would be a very unusual nuclear event.
Understood what you are saying but still you have to see if there is a legitimate reason for each element being present. Well since the fireproofing is generally made of fiberglass and gypsum and the entire building had a lot of drywall and drywall contains strontium reference EPA chinese drywall comparison with us manufactured drywall "Strontium was detected in the US-manufactured drywall at 244 ppm to 1,130 ppm" but I will study your website and do some research.
DeleteOf course the dead giveaway for nukes at Ground Zero is tritium. From our Mystery Solved article:
DeleteTritium is an isotope of hydrogen containing one proton and two neutrons. Tritium is radioactive with a half-life of 12.32 years. Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, comprising approximately 90% of the luminous universe by weight. Ordinary hydrogen (1H) accounts for greater than 99.985% of all naturally-occurring hydrogen, whereas deuterium (2H) comprises approximately 0.015%. By comparison, tritium (3H) represents only approximately 10^16 percent of hydrogen naturally occurring.
Tritium is a rare but natural isotope of hydrogen (H), and is the only natural hydrogen isotope that is radioactive. Notwithstanding the difference in mass, tritium can be found in the same chemical forms as hydrogen. The most important forms, from the perspective of atmospheric behavior of tritium, are tritiated hydrogen gas (HT) and tritiated water (HTO). These tritiated forms behave chemically like hydrogen gas (H2) and water (H2O). Tritium is generated by both natural and artificial processes. Tritium is naturally produced primarily through the interaction of cosmic radiation protons and neutrons with gases (including nitrogen, oxygen and argon) in the upper atmosphere. In addition to its natural sources, tritium also has a number of anthropogenic sources which account for the dominant proportion of the global tritium inventory.
Anthropogenic tritium sources include fallout from nuclear weapons testing, nuclear reactors, future fusion reactors, fuel reprocessing plants, heavy water production facilities and commercial production for medical diagnostics, radiopharmaceuticals, luminous paints, sign illumination, self-luminous aircraft, airport runway lights, luminous dials, gauges and wrist watches, and others.
Commercial uses of tritium account for only a small fraction of the tritium used worldwide. Instead, the primary use of tritium has been to boost the yield of both fission and thermonuclear (or fusion) weapons, increasing the efficiency with which the nuclear explosive materials are used. The tritium that is produced by a nuclear explosion is almost completely converted to tritiated water (HTO), which then mixes with environmental water. This is exactly what we saw in the basement of Building 6.
Well I think your Tritium level is your strongest possible evidence. Zinc could be explained away easily IF it was used for corrosion mitigation , strontium explained away because it is within normal levels contained in drywall. barium is so common that normal soil levels is between 200 and 3000 ppm. Yttrium is 58 and the average normal is 23 but then you need to add in all the fluorescent lights so that probably proves nothing. Uranium is normal at 3.92 ppm with a normal soil average of 3. Of course your challenge will come from those who will add up all the tritium in emergency signs in the buildings. But with all the water poured into those buildings it would seem that those signs had to have a hell of a lot of tritium in them and no doubt that many of them were into and past their half-life but you will still get a challenge for sure. I hope that you do solve the mystery
DeleteTritium on it's own sticks out like a sore thumb. The dust samples require some familiarity with uranium-235 fission. You have to be able to detect the pattern. Physicist Chris Busby is a guy that can see the pattern. Jeff Prager contacted Chris and here are his comments on the USGS dust samples:
DeleteAccording to world renowned nuclear physicist Dr. Christopher Busby, and based on his assessment of elements found in craters in Fallujah, Iraq, Lebanon and Ground Zero, the devices used are close to pure fusion devices in which little radioactivity after detonation would be seen. "Radioactivity would be present from Tritium H3 which together with He-4 is the product and some short lived gamma radiation from neutron activation products (e.g. Ca-45 from the Ca in concrete, Fe-55 from the steel). These would be radioactive for a few days only.
The concentration of Uranium is a key. This is slightly too high in the dust and much too high in the girder coatings. The activities for 2.7, 3.2, 4.7 and 7.57 are 33, 40, 58 and 93Bq/kg. The graph in the USGS data/Chemistry Table 1 shows that there is too much U on the girder coatings. Normal levels of U are about 12, at most 40Bq/kg."
Busby sees similarities between Ground Zero and Fallujah.
Building 6 is where they found all of the tritium 11 days after 9/11. The building had a massive crater in the middle of it after a 170 meter high plume of smoke was seen rising from it and "temperatures were so intense that concrete melted like lava around anything in its path." There is no doubt the WTC buildings were nuked.
Well we all agree it did not fall in the manner the government claims. Another possibility is a thermobaric weapon with nano-detonators. 6 of these puppies at 2000 lbs each and the proper fuel will deliver a destructive force equal to 2 tons of TNT per weapon. But I am just speculating, I just don't know how much TNT would be needed to turn the building to dust. But I believe 6 of these would close to the power of the Hiroshima nuke. We just need a new investigation, thats really what it all comes down to.
DeleteThere is never going to be a real investigation. The real perps will never face any charges for their heinous crimes.
DeleteThey used neutron bombs to destroy the WTC buildings. The 1,400 cars in the vicinity of the WTC were fried by neutrons and EMP. Conventional explosives cannot account for melted engine blocks in cars parked in the vicinity of the WTC. Conventional explosives cannot account for ground temps that were between 600 - 2,000 °F for six months after 9/11 at Ground Zero. Retained heat from underground nuclear explosions explain that perfectly.
They used fission-triggered (with a tritium boost) fusion bombs. The limited blast effects and neutron flux produced by the devices indicate they were neutron bombs.
For the few people that really care about the truth about what happened to the WTC buildings there it is. The government is never going to admit this. NIST is never going to come clean and no big name scientist is going to get up on TV and explain it to you. I'm just putting the info out there for those so inclined to find it.
Honestly most really don't care, that is the sad part, no matter what the polls say. Well just don't fade off into lala land like others around here and keep up the good work
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteDon Fox,
DeleteWhere did you get this?
"Niels Harrit himself said that it would take between 27,000 - 144,000 metric tons of nanothermite to destroy a Twin Tower."
Where did you get that? Did he publish such a comment or say it in a video or what?
What I said during the interview was that AE's belief (and mine) is that nanothermite was used to melt and thereby cut through the steel members and other explosives were used to blast the building apart.
Nobody from the Harrit paper ever said that nanothermite was the ONLY explosive or the ONLY compound used to take down the buildings. In fact Prof. Jones in answer to a question specifically said there were other explosives. There is no good reason to be confused on this point. Harrit and Jones and their team were neither confused nor confusing on this point.
Mark
Mark,
DeleteI was mistaken. 29,000 metric tons was the low end estimate:
Hightower has further calculated that if conventional explosives (such as TNT or RDX) acting alone were used to bring down the Twin Towers, the quantity necessary would have been hundreds of tons of explosives per tower. On July 27, 2011, Niels Harrit (chief author of the 2009 nanothermite paper) presented a calculation for how much thermitic material would have been necessary to explain the presence of the many tiny iron-rich spheres in the dust (assuming that a thermite reaction was the source of the spheres).
He gave a range of numbers, based on lower and higher concentrations of the thermite formulation. His lowest figure amounted to 29,000 metric tons of thermitic explosive per tower – a value hundreds of times greater than the calculation for conventional explosives. His “conservative” estimate (based on 10% iron-oxide in the thermitic material) was 143,000 metric tons of thermitic material that would have been placed in each tower. But let’s be realistic: How could the perpetrators drag in and plant over 100,000 tons of explosive without being seen? Even 29,000 tons is hard to imagine and would have been rather difficult to put in place unnoticed.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/27/nanothermite-if-it-doesnt-fit-you-must-acquit/
that obf error isn't an accident, is it jim?
ReplyDeletenor is the playing of sexy Sadie (referring to the fabricated 'man-son murders' nor the other beatles song played immediately before (referring to elvis's faked death!). kinda boring show otherwise, but I believe I see the point of it.
I Love it. The time is right.
nor do I think it an accident that the obf rebroadcast finished halfway through (with the broadcast completely finishing) with the beatles singing 'And In The End, The Love You Take Is Equal To The Love You Make! from their song 'The End'!
ReplyDeleteI Love It!
p.s. the second beatles song referenced in my first comment above was called 'Memphis, tennesse'!
sorry about this now, but jim started it!
ReplyDeletelyrics to Memphis Tennessee;
Long distance, information
Give me Memphis, Tennessee
Trying to find the party
Trying to get in touch with me
She would not leave her number
But I know who placed the call
The phone-boy took the message
And he wrote it on the wall
Help me, information
Get in touch with my Marie
She's the only one who'd phone me here
From Memphis, Tennessee
Her home is on the south side
Just beyond the ridge
Just a half a mile from the Mississippi bridge
Help me, information
More than that I cannot add
Only that I miss her
And all the fun we had
We were pulled apart, because
Her mom would not agree
Help me get in touch with her
In Memphis, Tennessee
The last time that I saw Marie
She was waving me goodbye
With hurry-home drops on her cheek
That trickled from her eye
Marie is only six years old
Information, please
Help me get in touch with her
In Memphis, Tennessee
This is a song about elvis faking his death in 1977 and having to leave his daughter lisa marie, who was 9 (born 1968) at the time...and we can't have the beatles making it too obvious for us now, can we jim?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeletelast one: sexy Sadie lyrics
ReplyDeleteSexy Sadie what have you done
You made a fool of everyone
You made a fool of everyone
Sexy Sadie ooh what have you done
Sexy Sadie you broke the rules
You layed it down for all to see
You layed it down for all to see
Sexy Sadie oooh you broke the rules
One sunny day the world was waiting for a lover
She came along to turn on everyone
Sexy Sadie the greatest of them all
Sexy Sadie how did you know
The world was waiting just for you
The world was waiting just for you
Sexy Sadie oooh how did you know
Sexy Sadie you'll get yours yet
However big you think you are
However big you think you are
Sexy Sadie oooh you'll get yours yet
We gave her everything we owned just to sit at her table
Just a smile would lighten everything
Sexy Sadie she's the latest and the greatest of them all
She made a fool of everyone
Sexy Sadie
However big you think you are
Sexy Sadie
I think Sexy Sadie is about isis but is connected to the 'man-son' 'murders', (which were a staged murder ritual (like 9/11) imo), it being the 'nickname' of susan atkins.
sorry for the diversion. none of this is is coincidence!
sorry about this shame-ass.
ReplyDeletebut poguemothoin.
now continue, please.
delete if you feel the need, jim.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Deletepshea:-
DeleteHow long have you been living in County Clare, Ireland?
p**shea*!!!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteNano-Thermite is an explosive from people who know what they are talking about. END of Discussion http://www.technologyreview.com/news/403624/military-reloads-with-nanotech/?a=f
ReplyDeleteSometimes progress slows down when money is involved. How much are these directors getting in this non-profit organization I wonder?
ReplyDelete~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Shaky Moral Foundation that AE911Truth is Built Upon
http://www.tax-tiger.com/tax-help/tax-relief-experts.html?mm_campaign=22b2cf4db3e35062007db2bbc03a74df&keyword=tax%20lawyers&gclid=CI_Ryu-vn7oCFcxaMgodulIAdQ
In a sense, this aspect of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth may be the most troubling one for some individuals, because a non-profit organization (501c3) isn't supposed to have secret agendas or spend its money in a manner that is not disclosed to anyone, including the very people who are donating to the "charity". Out of a sense of (perhaps misplaced) loyalty to people who were formerly our friends, we are avoiding reporting more about this topic.
One of the organization's biggest problems is the provocateurs who are propelled to the top positions. Discord sowing provocateurs were the ones who screamed loudest, above the more humble people of character. (It is worth mentioning that this is the textbook behavior of most governmental infiltrators.) Such people have been promoted to managerial positions because Richard Gage personally made the core principle of the organization to be one of appeasement, which eventually led to the technical meltdown that was cited earlier.
Even identified governmental agents are freely allowed to influence the organization and to gain access to the private data of its members, for the sake of comprehensive appeasement. We personally outed one of those governmental spies (Homeland Security), but Richard's reaction was to encourage us to shut-up.
We also have reason to believe that a percentage of donations supporting AE911truth are actually governmental pay-outs that are attributed to people who do not really exist. AE911Truth is likely one of the U.S. Government's best honey pots for attracting the trouble-makers who are in prestigious positions in society.
Thus, it is in the interest of domestic spying agencies to ensure that the organization survives with their spooks in high positions. Such help is also likely to be involved in Richard Gage's easy ability to get interviews with major news networks, such as Fox, and even Alex Jones on multiple occasions.
I have finally come to realize that the people that follow what is disseminated here are .99 cents short of a worthless dollar.
ReplyDeleteHey folks, the OBF *was* a screw-up; it was my screw-up. I am rendering a new file right now.
ReplyDeleteHowever, the choice of music in the episodes I cut is usually not an accident.
haha! vindicated, eh total? I thought it might have been you! (I hope the hatred manifested in shame-asses words doesn't reflect badly on all us irish. I even suspect shame-ass might be sarah!) I am 41 yrs old and live in ennis, co. clare, eire. I am an honest man. I am a free man, and I know somewhat the scale and scope of the complete media fakery hoaxes perpetrated against the people over the years (the latest tv stage began with JFK 50 years ago, carried on through 9/11 and 7/7, and continues to this day to sandy hook and boston - I now even suspect the whole madeleine McCann saga is another hoax with MM being nothing more that a computer generated entity (a la 9/11 vicsims).- funnily enough em-i-lie parker from sandyhook (who didn't exist) has a sister called madeleine and madeleine McCann, who I strongly suspect doesn't exist, has a sister called amelie!)). I am becoming more and more aware of the true nature of things (in this fake world of ours), the extents to which we have been deceived is truly mind-boggling. but I have a tremendous feeling that these days of deep confusion are almost done. And, with The End, i think i am happy enough now to be meeting my Make-r.
ReplyDeleteI Love It, Total!
p.s John Cotner is/was/ Elvis Presley! the real Paul McCartney went on to 'really' 'die' as neil aspinall (as-in-paul) - the 5th beatle - a couple of years ago. the chin and scars around the face don't lie!).
NB: New, corrected file, uploaded
ReplyDeletePosted by Total at 11:55 PM
11.55 eh? Nice!
but 50 is the magic number!
I never hid my identity shame-ass, and have nothing to hide. and I don't care if you are irish or not, you have a foul mouth sir/madame/buachaill/caileen.
slawn leat.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteTwo individuals completely lost in 911 dust, endlessly divining/arguing "the truth" of how building 7 came down by endlessly watching 100% faked videos of building 7's demise. What a laugh! Keep it up guys!
ReplyDeleteRegards, onebornfree.
October 18, 2013 at 4:45 AM
are you out of the insane asylum again onebornfree. welcome back
DeleteWhat is your basis for claiming that videos of building 7 coming down are faked?
DeleteDo you have a video of building 7 coming down that you claim is not faked? Why should anybody believe you?
Mark
After listening to the last segment of this show I lost the last shred of feeling that Mark Graham is just a true believer in AE and is one who simply became frustrated with administrative disorganization and therefore left AE after three years of, I assume, all unpaid volunteer work. (If he was a volunteer, one wonders how he could have afforded to give so much of his time to unpaid activity.)
ReplyDeleteI have noticed that several “patriot media groups”, often referred to as “the truth movement” to include groups devoted to widely varying issues and goals, not only the 9-11 issue, will from time to time have leaders or members or former members make a big deal about how the group has serious problems that are not being addressed. This disgruntled group leader or former member or employee of the is very careful, as Mr. Graham was, to never say one negative word about the legitimacy of the group, its leaders, and the group’s mission, but who just expresses what appear to be serious weaknesses in the organization for its administration or some issue not related to the organization’s purported main objectives. The weaknesses/problems within the organization are implied to never have been corrected and all of this results in frustrated volunteers who never could have their efforts really contribute to achieving the group’s goals and who leaver and come out and now tell all from an insider’s perspective. When this negativity being expressed in an objective way about the organization by someone who was a team leader and an insider makes it seem important, as though we are not being told all, given the straight skinny, about the inner workings of the organization, however, it is just more much ado about nothing.
This kind of testimony given by “former” insider, Mark Graham, certainly works strongly to lend credibility to the legitimacy, good intentions, and organization that has all the usual internal strife difficulties of most organizations. No, AE is not an ordinary non-profit organization working at a grass roots level for good. Nanothermite Gangs, including AE, have from the beginning been a government-issued enterprise, part of the orignal planning for the cover-up phase of the 9-11 event..
In other words, I now think Mark Graham is still an insider with the Nanothermite Gang (A&E for 9/11 Truth organization, one of several seemingly discreet, current and concurrent, and former Nanothermite Gang Groups) and Mr. Graham is still working for AE by doing this bit of play acting The Real Deal radio show.)
This is similar to what is called “a limited hangout” and “sheep dipping” in the world of misinformation ploys.
While Dr. Fetzer did do a good job of expressing his problems or complaints against AE, I was quite disappointed that his general position was that AE and “Professor” Steven Jones’ operation were negligent in “not going further” in their pursuit of scientific truth.
No, we do NOT want the Nanothermite Gang to go further in their long string of misinformation and disinformation ploys. We need the Nanothermite Gang to immediately cease operations and go completely out of business, including the Nanothermite Gang’s most recent false group called Rethink911.org.
Just as the AE and Dr. Jones’ people have been fond of collectiviziing ALL 9-11 truth seeking efforts into one thing they call the “9-11 truth MOVEMENT” and collectivizing the concept of “collapse” in to WTC Buildings !, 2, and 7, I take the liberty of collectivizing the ENTIRE OPERATION of the Dr. Steven Jones and Mr. Richard Gage and all of their many and variously named “truth” groups from early 2005 until today as the NANOTHERMITE GANG, an entity that has never been about seeking truth at all.
Jeannon, I think you are right and that I have been too kind to A&E9/11. Have you seen "The Complete Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference" and especially Part 2, where I critique their work? I would be glad to have your review.
DeleteJeannon,
DeleteAbout this: "In other words, I now think Mark Graham is still an insider with the Nanothermite Gang (A&E for 9/11 Truth organization, one of several seemingly discreet, current and concurrent, and former Nanothermite Gang Groups) and Mr. Graham is still working for AE by doing this bit of play acting The Real Deal radio show.)"
That is total nonsense. There is no logical or factual basis for this claim.
About this: "Nanothermite Gangs, including AE, have from the beginning been a government-issued enterprise, part of the orignal planning for the cover-up phase of the 9-11 event."
Apparently you didn't notice but the nanothermite paper was published in early 2009, 7 1/2 years after 9/11.
All of my volunteer work for AE, which amounted to thousands of hours over three years, was unpaid. They never paid me a cent.
Mark
Correction of one of my many mistakes...
ReplyDeleteChange
"as though we are not being told all"
To
"as though we are NOW being told all"
Bill,
DeleteI have it on good authority that Morgan is the one running the Judy Wood DEW OP. Don't expect Morgan to fall on his sword anytime soon. Judy appears to be closely aligned with the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center. That should tell you all you need to know about her!
I suspect that Jeannon is right about Mark although Jim thinks he's a good guy. Either way Gage is certainly a limited hangout. How long can they promote a theory that has no explanatory power for what happened to the WTC buildings?
And Morgan has such a good rep as someone who rejected Reagan's policies! Such great work exposing the phoney "crashing planes" theory, too. That puts me back to square one on Morgan. If you can give some more substantiation for what you said, I'd be grateful. Frightening if true about Wood and ADL, but a lot of people are deceived into thinking it's anti-racist. As for the Southern Poverty Law Center, the exposures I've read come from the Libertarian "movement", which I trust even less than Morris Dees. The SPI has always been a non-entity, as far as I can see, in the ongoing civil-rights struggle here; I can't recall ever meeting an activist who claimed they worked with them, and I've met people from dozens of activist organizations.
DeleteI got an email last summer (2012) from an insider. This is someone you have heard of and who knows what they are talking about. I haven't been able to confirm the info on Morgan so I can't really say with 100% confidence he's an intel op. But knowing what I do about Judy how could he not be?
DeleteAfter our Israel nuked the WTC article came in August several of us (Jim included) got frantic emails from someone using Fetzer's wife's name. The writing style was Judy Wood's. She CC'd several people in the ADL and SPLC on these emails. She obviously works closely with those organizations. Both the ADL and SPLC are known Mossad front organizations. That should tell you all you need to know about Judy Wood.
how am I a liar shame-ass?
ReplyDeletep##shea#
DeleteI volunteered with AE when it first got started doing web design. Everything Mark described was same back then. I wasted vast amount to time to get very little done. Their web master would change passwords on the server accounts without letting me know. I got frustrated and quit after about 4 months.
ReplyDeleteAE is one of the big reasons this "movement" never goes anywhere. The few people that are left just spin their wheels and never put a dent in the BS.
DeleteGage is doing exactly what they want him to do. He's not going to suddenly become this effective leader out of the blue and put heat on the power structure. There is never going to be a groundswell of support that forces the system do something. Gage does just enough to sucker the Truth Movement into thinking that SOMETHING is being done when in reality NOTHING IS BEING DONE!
911truthnc,
DeleteAs the Volunteer Team Leader for nearly three years I saw this happen many times. We were aware that volunteers were getting frustrated and that hurt morale and caused them to quit. I did what I could to prepare volunteers for the inevitable moment(s) when they would find out how unorganized and dysfunctional everything was, starting with Gage.
I also made some of these recommendations directly to Gage and the overall Team. Gage's response was to accuse me, in an email sent to the entire AE Team, of "projectile vomiting" and to suspend me from writing to the entire Team for 60 days. I am not kidding. And he made zero effort to implement any of my suggestions which he called "excellent suggestions".
You deserve credit for lasting four months in AE. Many volunteers last through, or half way through, the first conference call. As I said in my Insider Analysis Gage places a huge emphasis on the conference calls, considering them key to the operation of AE. But they are the most unplanned, argument filled, unproductive calls. They are not even designed to lead to a decision or decisions. Not surprisingly, they don't.
What Michael Armenia described experiencing in 2008 and 2009, when he was a Board member at AE and Volunteer Coordinator as well as several other roles, was still happening in 2010 through November 2012 when I was there. Nothing has changed. Gage keeps it all the same.
Mark
Don Fox,
DeleteNot much is being done by AE911Truth but other organizations are taking action.
Check out for example
http://www.consensus911.org/
and
http://stj911.org/
and
http://www.911truth.org/
I encourage you and anybody, if you have an idea for a 9/11 Truth project that you want to do, find some allies to work on it with you and then make a project plan and get started! You don't need to wait for an organization although you can contact these I have cited for information. You can use my outline for a project plan that is in my Insider Analysis of AE911Truth.
Get started, get it finished and delivered, and then do what you can to publicize it. Create a web site and a page for your project and show it off to the movement and the world. 911blogger.com will often put on their front page members' blog entries (but not always).
Good luck,
Mark
I have been following AE for years. Nowhere publicly has AE directly endorsed any other explosive other than thermite/thermate.
ReplyDeleteRockets at the World Trade Center
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvw0_i1rGns
togue gu bug eh, paddy.
ReplyDeleteawgus an-shin, pogue mu howen freshen!
(I spell it as it sounds - for the benefit of any non Gaeilge speaking readers, which I am sure there are a few).
I just told paddy that he could kiss my arse (along with shame-ass!) and if you would like to meet up paddy, I will declare it in clear and proper terms to your face, a chara.
pshea (aka Peter Sheehan/Sheahan)
DeleteAre you making veiled threats of violence against other blog users?
no. I would really tell them to kiss my arse, in clear irish, and to their faces, for the foul language and dirty attitudes they have displayed here. I am not very proud of my country of it's countrymen sometimes.
ReplyDeleteif I am viewed as a fool here, so be it. no-one has to follow. and I haven't tried to hide my name for any reason. I was on a call at the beginning of the year on fakeologist radio and I used my real name then and it was known that my user name was pshea.
and it is peter sheehan. but what of it? who is supposed to give a fuck?
OrganicBananas said: "What is your basis for claiming that videos of building 7 coming down are faked? "
ReplyDeleteSee: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4Vrsjs_cLg
All "live" network broadcasts aired on 911, including all tower collapses depicted [eg. WT1, 2 ,and 7 ], were faked, prefabricated computer animations broadcast as live footage.
See: "9/11 Scams:The Faked "Live" CNN WTC1 Collapse Footage":
http://onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.com/2013/09/911-scamsthe-faked-live-cnn-wtc1.html
and: "9/11 Scams: Real N.Y.C. Images Vs. Fake MSM 9/11 Media Broadcast Footage- Random Examples":
http://onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.com/2013/08/some-examples-of-genuine-pre-911-video.html
Regards, onebornfree