tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post1149156292335081493..comments2024-03-02T21:58:21.667-08:00Comments on The Real Deal with Jim Fetzer podcast: Mark GrahamUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger59125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-39316999369689746782013-10-29T12:01:38.930-07:002013-10-29T12:01:38.930-07:00OrganicBananas said: "What is your basis for ...OrganicBananas said: "What is your basis for claiming that videos of building 7 coming down are faked? " <br /><br />See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4Vrsjs_cLg<br /><br />All "live" network broadcasts aired on 911, including all tower collapses depicted [eg. WT1, 2 ,and 7 ], were faked, prefabricated computer animations broadcast as live footage. <br /><br />See: "9/11 Scams:The Faked "Live" CNN WTC1 Collapse Footage": <br /><br />http://onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.com/2013/09/911-scamsthe-faked-live-cnn-wtc1.html<br /><br />and: "9/11 Scams: Real N.Y.C. Images Vs. Fake MSM 9/11 Media Broadcast Footage- Random Examples": <br /><br />http://onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.com/2013/08/some-examples-of-genuine-pre-911-video.html<br /><br />Regards, onebornfreeOnebornfreehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17865185718738348312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-22630838648565910062013-10-26T18:57:31.785-07:002013-10-26T18:57:31.785-07:00no. I would really tell them to kiss my arse, in c...no. I would really tell them to kiss my arse, in clear irish, and to their faces, for the foul language and dirty attitudes they have displayed here. I am not very proud of my country of it's countrymen sometimes.<br />if I am viewed as a fool here, so be it. no-one has to follow. and I haven't tried to hide my name for any reason. I was on a call at the beginning of the year on fakeologist radio and I used my real name then and it was known that my user name was pshea. <br />and it is peter sheehan. but what of it? who is supposed to give a fuck?psheahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00450736873877898876noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-43759050108045838452013-10-25T20:47:05.821-07:002013-10-25T20:47:05.821-07:00pshea (aka Peter Sheehan/Sheahan)
Are you making ...pshea (aka Peter Sheehan/Sheahan)<br /><br />Are you making veiled threats of violence against other blog users?Doug Hendersenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12504028345626153436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-6506557651394148912013-10-23T16:32:13.989-07:002013-10-23T16:32:13.989-07:00Mark,
I was mistaken. 29,000 metric tons was the ...Mark,<br /><br />I was mistaken. 29,000 metric tons was the low end estimate:<br /><br />Hightower has further calculated that if conventional explosives (such as TNT or RDX) acting alone were used to bring down the Twin Towers, the quantity necessary would have been hundreds of tons of explosives per tower. On July 27, 2011, Niels Harrit (chief author of the 2009 nanothermite paper) presented a calculation for how much thermitic material would have been necessary to explain the presence of the many tiny iron-rich spheres in the dust (assuming that a thermite reaction was the source of the spheres).<br /><br />He gave a range of numbers, based on lower and higher concentrations of the thermite formulation. His lowest figure amounted to 29,000 metric tons of thermitic explosive per tower – a value hundreds of times greater than the calculation for conventional explosives. His “conservative” estimate (based on 10% iron-oxide in the thermitic material) was 143,000 metric tons of thermitic material that would have been placed in each tower. But let’s be realistic: How could the perpetrators drag in and plant over 100,000 tons of explosive without being seen? Even 29,000 tons is hard to imagine and would have been rather difficult to put in place unnoticed.<br /><br />http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/27/nanothermite-if-it-doesnt-fit-you-must-acquit/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-8838684290333218872013-10-23T15:31:17.492-07:002013-10-23T15:31:17.492-07:00togue gu bug eh, paddy.
awgus an-shin, pogue mu ho...togue gu bug eh, paddy.<br />awgus an-shin, pogue mu howen freshen!<br /><br />(I spell it as it sounds - for the benefit of any non Gaeilge speaking readers, which I am sure there are a few).<br /><br />I just told paddy that he could kiss my arse (along with shame-ass!) and if you would like to meet up paddy, I will declare it in clear and proper terms to your face, a chara.psheahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00450736873877898876noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-44609978601219551522013-10-23T12:42:52.140-07:002013-10-23T12:42:52.140-07:00Don Fox,
Not much is being done by AE911Truth but...Don Fox,<br /><br />Not much is being done by AE911Truth but other organizations are taking action. <br /><br />Check out for example <br /><br />http://www.consensus911.org/<br /><br />and<br /><br />http://stj911.org/<br /><br />and<br /><br />http://www.911truth.org/<br /><br />I encourage you and anybody, if you have an idea for a 9/11 Truth project that you want to do, find some allies to work on it with you and then make a project plan and get started! You don't need to wait for an organization although you can contact these I have cited for information. You can use my outline for a project plan that is in my Insider Analysis of AE911Truth. <br /><br />Get started, get it finished and delivered, and then do what you can to publicize it. Create a web site and a page for your project and show it off to the movement and the world. 911blogger.com will often put on their front page members' blog entries (but not always). <br /><br />Good luck, <br /><br />Mark<br /><br />OrganicBananashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03261754756454517919noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-11589097386952716142013-10-23T12:33:53.201-07:002013-10-23T12:33:53.201-07:00911truthnc,
As the Volunteer Team Leader for near...911truthnc, <br />As the Volunteer Team Leader for nearly three years I saw this happen many times. We were aware that volunteers were getting frustrated and that hurt morale and caused them to quit. I did what I could to prepare volunteers for the inevitable moment(s) when they would find out how unorganized and dysfunctional everything was, starting with Gage. <br /><br />I also made some of these recommendations directly to Gage and the overall Team. Gage's response was to accuse me, in an email sent to the entire AE Team, of "projectile vomiting" and to suspend me from writing to the entire Team for 60 days. I am not kidding. And he made zero effort to implement any of my suggestions which he called "excellent suggestions". <br /><br />You deserve credit for lasting four months in AE. Many volunteers last through, or half way through, the first conference call. As I said in my Insider Analysis Gage places a huge emphasis on the conference calls, considering them key to the operation of AE. But they are the most unplanned, argument filled, unproductive calls. They are not even designed to lead to a decision or decisions. Not surprisingly, they don't. <br /><br />What Michael Armenia described experiencing in 2008 and 2009, when he was a Board member at AE and Volunteer Coordinator as well as several other roles, was still happening in 2010 through November 2012 when I was there. Nothing has changed. Gage keeps it all the same. <br /> <br />Mark OrganicBananashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03261754756454517919noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-21616735587222107502013-10-23T12:19:52.895-07:002013-10-23T12:19:52.895-07:00Jeannon,
About this: "In other words, I now...Jeannon,<br /><br />About this: "In other words, I now think Mark Graham is still an insider with the Nanothermite Gang (A&E for 9/11 Truth organization, one of several seemingly discreet, current and concurrent, and former Nanothermite Gang Groups) and Mr. Graham is still working for AE by doing this bit of play acting The Real Deal radio show.)"<br /><br />That is total nonsense. There is no logical or factual basis for this claim. <br /><br />About this: "Nanothermite Gangs, including AE, have from the beginning been a government-issued enterprise, part of the orignal planning for the cover-up phase of the 9-11 event."<br /><br />Apparently you didn't notice but the nanothermite paper was published in early 2009, 7 1/2 years after 9/11. <br /><br />All of my volunteer work for AE, which amounted to thousands of hours over three years, was unpaid. They never paid me a cent. <br /><br />Mark<br /><br /><br />OrganicBananashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03261754756454517919noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-33356653999209470862013-10-23T12:12:10.394-07:002013-10-23T12:12:10.394-07:00What is your basis for claiming that videos of bui...What is your basis for claiming that videos of building 7 coming down are faked? <br /><br />Do you have a video of building 7 coming down that you claim is not faked? Why should anybody believe you? <br />MarkOrganicBananashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03261754756454517919noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-15938805039067076802013-10-23T12:06:26.453-07:002013-10-23T12:06:26.453-07:00Don Fox,
Where did you get this?
"Niels Har...Don Fox,<br /><br />Where did you get this?<br /><br />"Niels Harrit himself said that it would take between 27,000 - 144,000 metric tons of nanothermite to destroy a Twin Tower."<br /><br />Where did you get that? Did he publish such a comment or say it in a video or what?<br /><br />What I said during the interview was that AE's belief (and mine) is that nanothermite was used to melt and thereby cut through the steel members and other explosives were used to blast the building apart.<br /><br />Nobody from the Harrit paper ever said that nanothermite was the ONLY explosive or the ONLY compound used to take down the buildings. In fact Prof. Jones in answer to a question specifically said there were other explosives. There is no good reason to be confused on this point. Harrit and Jones and their team were neither confused nor confusing on this point.<br /><br />Mark<br />OrganicBananashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03261754756454517919noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-17448493100787734012013-10-23T12:03:22.136-07:002013-10-23T12:03:22.136-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.OrganicBananashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03261754756454517919noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-12181580149891822092013-10-21T21:20:27.321-07:002013-10-21T21:20:27.321-07:00I got an email last summer (2012) from an insider....I got an email last summer (2012) from an insider. This is someone you have heard of and who knows what they are talking about. I haven't been able to confirm the info on Morgan so I can't really say with 100% confidence he's an intel op. But knowing what I do about Judy how could he not be?<br /><br />After our Israel nuked the WTC article came in August several of us (Jim included) got frantic emails from someone using Fetzer's wife's name. The writing style was Judy Wood's. She CC'd several people in the ADL and SPLC on these emails. She obviously works closely with those organizations. Both the ADL and SPLC are known Mossad front organizations. That should tell you all you need to know about Judy Wood.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-12324134338404970782013-10-20T10:31:02.437-07:002013-10-20T10:31:02.437-07:00p##shea#p##shea#Jan Meyershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03222919251203066672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-49384225497830058082013-10-20T07:04:46.947-07:002013-10-20T07:04:46.947-07:00Jeannon, I think you are right and that I have bee...Jeannon, I think you are right and that I have been too kind to A&E9/11. Have you seen "The Complete Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference" and especially Part 2, where I critique their work? I would be glad to have your review.Jim Fetzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05539733121153973439noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-82745982862857689552013-10-20T01:09:51.052-07:002013-10-20T01:09:51.052-07:00And Morgan has such a good rep as someone who reje...And Morgan has such a good rep as someone who rejected Reagan's policies! Such great work exposing the phoney "crashing planes" theory, too. That puts me back to square one on Morgan. If you can give some more substantiation for what you said, I'd be grateful. Frightening if true about Wood and ADL, but a lot of people are deceived into thinking it's <i>anti-</i>racist. As for the Southern Poverty Law Center, the exposures I've read come from the Libertarian "movement", which I trust even less than Morris Dees. The SPI has always been a non-entity, as far as I can see, in the ongoing civil-rights struggle here; I can't recall ever meeting an activist who claimed they worked with them, and I've met people from dozens of activist organizations. Atlanta Billhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13731574644449276796noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-10538137426093642682013-10-19T16:51:04.073-07:002013-10-19T16:51:04.073-07:00Honestly most really don't care, that is the s...Honestly most really don't care, that is the sad part, no matter what the polls say. Well just don't fade off into lala land like others around here and keep up the good workAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-8268143506548639562013-10-19T09:34:05.382-07:002013-10-19T09:34:05.382-07:00There is never going to be a real investigation. T...There is never going to be a real investigation. The real perps will never face any charges for their heinous crimes. <br /><br />They used neutron bombs to destroy the WTC buildings. The 1,400 cars in the vicinity of the WTC were fried by neutrons and EMP. Conventional explosives cannot account for melted engine blocks in cars parked in the vicinity of the WTC. Conventional explosives cannot account for ground temps that were between 600 - 2,000 °F for six months after 9/11 at Ground Zero. Retained heat from underground nuclear explosions explain that perfectly. <br /><br />They used fission-triggered (with a tritium boost) fusion bombs. The limited blast effects and neutron flux produced by the devices indicate they were neutron bombs. <br /><br />For the few people that really care about the truth about what happened to the WTC buildings there it is. The government is never going to admit this. NIST is never going to come clean and no big name scientist is going to get up on TV and explain it to you. I'm just putting the info out there for those so inclined to find it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-3791766217156531162013-10-19T09:18:58.493-07:002013-10-19T09:18:58.493-07:00AE is one of the big reasons this "movement&q...AE is one of the big reasons this "movement" never goes anywhere. The few people that are left just spin their wheels and never put a dent in the BS. <br /><br />Gage is doing exactly what they want him to do. He's not going to suddenly become this effective leader out of the blue and put heat on the power structure. There is never going to be a groundswell of support that forces the system do something. Gage does just enough to sucker the Truth Movement into thinking that SOMETHING is being done when in reality NOTHING IS BEING DONE!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-13438668885172027632013-10-19T07:04:08.170-07:002013-10-19T07:04:08.170-07:00Well we all agree it did not fall in the manner th...Well we all agree it did not fall in the manner the government claims. Another possibility is a thermobaric weapon with nano-detonators. 6 of these puppies at 2000 lbs each and the proper fuel will deliver a destructive force equal to 2 tons of TNT per weapon. But I am just speculating, I just don't know how much TNT would be needed to turn the building to dust. But I believe 6 of these would close to the power of the Hiroshima nuke. We just need a new investigation, thats really what it all comes down to.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-74261761146391944892013-10-19T06:42:10.633-07:002013-10-19T06:42:10.633-07:00I have been following AE for years. Nowhere publi...I have been following AE for years. Nowhere publicly has AE directly endorsed any other explosive other than thermite/thermate. <br /><br />Rockets at the World Trade Center <br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvw0_i1rGns911truthnchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14932911952958707253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-41240266004211721702013-10-19T06:36:36.222-07:002013-10-19T06:36:36.222-07:00I volunteered with AE when it first got started do...I volunteered with AE when it first got started doing web design. Everything Mark described was same back then. I wasted vast amount to time to get very little done. Their web master would change passwords on the server accounts without letting me know. I got frustrated and quit after about 4 months.<br /><br />911truthnchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14932911952958707253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-20979615588537588152013-10-19T04:21:03.062-07:002013-10-19T04:21:03.062-07:00Tritium on it's own sticks out like a sore thu...Tritium on it's own sticks out like a sore thumb. The dust samples require some familiarity with uranium-235 fission. You have to be able to detect the pattern. Physicist Chris Busby is a guy that can see the pattern. Jeff Prager contacted Chris and here are his comments on the USGS dust samples:<br /><br />According to world renowned nuclear physicist Dr. Christopher Busby, and based on his assessment of elements found in craters in Fallujah, Iraq, Lebanon and Ground Zero, the devices used are close to pure fusion devices in which little radioactivity after detonation would be seen. "Radioactivity would be present from Tritium H3 which together with He-4 is the product and some short lived gamma radiation from neutron activation products (e.g. Ca-45 from the Ca in concrete, Fe-55 from the steel). These would be radioactive for a few days only.<br /><br />The concentration of Uranium is a key. This is slightly too high in the dust and much too high in the girder coatings. The activities for 2.7, 3.2, 4.7 and 7.57 are 33, 40, 58 and 93Bq/kg. The graph in the USGS data/Chemistry Table 1 shows that there is too much U on the girder coatings. Normal levels of U are about 12, at most 40Bq/kg."<br /><br />Busby sees similarities between Ground Zero and Fallujah.<br /><br />Building 6 is where they found all of the tritium 11 days after 9/11. The building had a massive crater in the middle of it after a 170 meter high plume of smoke was seen rising from it and "temperatures were so intense that concrete melted like lava around anything in its path." There is no doubt the WTC buildings were nuked. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-7357410935131089702013-10-19T03:52:28.541-07:002013-10-19T03:52:28.541-07:00Bill,
I have it on good authority that Morgan is ...Bill,<br /><br />I have it on good authority that Morgan is the one running the Judy Wood DEW OP. Don't expect Morgan to fall on his sword anytime soon. Judy appears to be closely aligned with the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center. That should tell you all you need to know about her!<br /><br />I suspect that Jeannon is right about Mark although Jim thinks he's a good guy. Either way Gage is certainly a limited hangout. How long can they promote a theory that has no explanatory power for what happened to the WTC buildings?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-19625631336422156422013-10-18T21:01:45.429-07:002013-10-18T21:01:45.429-07:00Well I think your Tritium level is your strongest ...Well I think your Tritium level is your strongest possible evidence. Zinc could be explained away easily IF it was used for corrosion mitigation , strontium explained away because it is within normal levels contained in drywall. barium is so common that normal soil levels is between 200 and 3000 ppm. Yttrium is 58 and the average normal is 23 but then you need to add in all the fluorescent lights so that probably proves nothing. Uranium is normal at 3.92 ppm with a normal soil average of 3. Of course your challenge will come from those who will add up all the tritium in emergency signs in the buildings. But with all the water poured into those buildings it would seem that those signs had to have a hell of a lot of tritium in them and no doubt that many of them were into and past their half-life but you will still get a challenge for sure. I hope that you do solve the mysteryAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-10691893860512055882013-10-18T16:41:19.934-07:002013-10-18T16:41:19.934-07:00Of course the dead giveaway for nukes at Ground Ze...Of course the dead giveaway for nukes at Ground Zero is tritium. From our <a href="http://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/" rel="nofollow">Mystery Solved article: </a><br /><br />Tritium is an isotope of hydrogen containing one proton and two neutrons. Tritium is radioactive with a half-life of 12.32 years. Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, comprising approximately 90% of the luminous universe by weight. Ordinary hydrogen (1H) accounts for greater than 99.985% of all naturally-occurring hydrogen, whereas deuterium (2H) comprises approximately 0.015%. By comparison, tritium (3H) represents only approximately 10^16 percent of hydrogen naturally occurring. <br /><br />Tritium is a rare but natural isotope of hydrogen (H), and is the only natural hydrogen isotope that is radioactive. Notwithstanding the difference in mass, tritium can be found in the same chemical forms as hydrogen. The most important forms, from the perspective of atmospheric behavior of tritium, are tritiated hydrogen gas (HT) and tritiated water (HTO). These tritiated forms behave chemically like hydrogen gas (H2) and water (H2O). Tritium is generated by both natural and artificial processes. Tritium is naturally produced primarily through the interaction of cosmic radiation protons and neutrons with gases (including nitrogen, oxygen and argon) in the upper atmosphere. In addition to its natural sources, tritium also has a number of anthropogenic sources which account for the dominant proportion of the global tritium inventory. <br /><br />Anthropogenic tritium sources include fallout from nuclear weapons testing, nuclear reactors, future fusion reactors, fuel reprocessing plants, heavy water production facilities and commercial production for medical diagnostics, radiopharmaceuticals, luminous paints, sign illumination, self-luminous aircraft, airport runway lights, luminous dials, gauges and wrist watches, and others.<br /><br />Commercial uses of tritium account for only a small fraction of the tritium used worldwide. Instead, the primary use of tritium has been to boost the yield of both fission and thermonuclear (or fusion) weapons, increasing the efficiency with which the nuclear explosive materials are used. The tritium that is produced by a nuclear explosion is almost completely converted to tritiated water (HTO), which then mixes with environmental water. This is exactly what we saw in the basement of Building 6.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com