Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
PLEASE SUPPORT REVERE RADIO:
SUBSCRIBE to the RSS feed
DONATE to Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
---------
(Right-click on guest name to download mp3)
SUBSCRIBE to the iTunes feed
STREAM premieres on Revere Radio
5pm CST (2300 GMT) M-W-F:
---
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(152)
-
▼
May
(14)
- Allan Weisbecker
- Jim Fetzer / Jim Marrs
- Dennis Cimino
- Kevin Barrett
- Bill Still / Karen Hudes / Mark Novitsky
- Jim Fetzer
- Sofia Smallstorm / James Tracy
- Kevin Barrett / Meria Heller
- Stew Webb / Dennis Cimino
- Allan Weisbecker
- Jeff Boss / Kevin Barrett
- Ronald Cole
- Mark Elsis
- Sophia Smallstorm, Jenny Lake
-
▼
May
(14)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXpo7jhisb0
ReplyDeleteThanks for the link here, re. the Newtown / Sandy Hook claims of a massacre. --- Yes, they're still showing the nearby St Rose of Lima school drill (police running into the very different entranceway of SROL, vs. the shape of the entranceway of Sandy Hook Elementary). They get away with showing the drill footage because most people won't look at "the weird and wacky" theoretical backing (evidence) we do know.
DeleteAt this point in history, it's hard to believe there are still people who claim to buy the official story of the Kennedy assassination. The guy who interviewed you seems sincere, but he is either woefully uninformed on the topic, or he is a paid shill, and I can't accept that the guy is that stupid, so I must conclude he is a paid shill - Operation Mockingbird anyone? They are all over the place.
ReplyDeleteI very much liked Jim Marrs assessment of Stone's film. He (Stone) had to take liberties with the historical material in order to streamline the narrative and grab the attention of the mass movie watcher. He had three hours to get a ton of information across, and he did a terrific job. Even if only 80 % of the claims in the film are correct (debatable), that is heads and shoulders above what the government and mass news media have achieved in the years since.
Kudos to both of you guys.
Excellent talk by Michael Rowbotham, author of "Grip of Death."
ReplyDeleteThe Significance of Monetary Reform: The Disaster of Debt Based Economics (Part I of 5)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ri3dGo7BZVM
Parts 2 to 5:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ISyuvkm2A0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVA7vqfSMt4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR0ML_KTnO4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7CZPdGLpik
The Significance of Monetary Reform:
DeleteThanks for the links. A very interesting presentation.
You will enjoy this:
The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the America Decline
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_gj1uZ6194
Thanks, I just finished watching that. Really good. Only criticism is that he's an intelligent design guy, as opposed to an evolutionist. The other 99% of the talk is excellent though.
DeleteGreat show from the two Jims. Very interesting.
ReplyDeleteJim's words on RFK having been directed by an aid to go through the kitchen where he was tragically assassinated put me in mind of a TV show I watched. It showed live TV coverage of JFK's visit to Fort Worth and in particular the Chamber of Commerce dinner. It showed all the guests seated at tables including Jackie. But JFK had been delayed. He was delayed for quite a while and the TV commentators had to "fill in" for some time. Eventually JFK emerges to be greeted by the guests and LBJ. What is interesting about this is that JFK had taken or presumably had been advised to take a detour through the kitchen!!
I have always wondered whether there had been
an abandoned attempt to assassinate JFK in that kitchen.
Just a thought...
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteNice job, Jim, keeping your composure and bringing a torrent of facts to bear in your interview with those two twats in the first part of this podcast. It was obvious their only agenda was to ridicule and denigrate "conspiracy theorists".
ReplyDeleteThe obvious LN interviewing Professor Jim sounded strangely like Pete Santilli. Anyone else think this or is it just me? Anyway, Professor Jim put the clown, whoever he was, in his place...in the nicest possible way, of course.
ReplyDeleteGreat show from both Jims!!
did you guys here what sanshilli said about clinton?
ReplyDeleteHey, what did Monica Lewinsky find in her dress?
ReplyDeleteA wad of Bill's
Ha!
That's just you all over, Constructor.
ReplyDeleteJokes, jokes, jokes!! That's all we get
from you.
What three words does Bill Clinton hate
to hear when he's making love?
" Honey, I'm home!!"
Jim Marrs has the unique ability of exposing the obvious.
ReplyDeleteYou mean he's not afraid to tell it like it is? I agree.
DeleteHonesty and truth are rare
attributes in today's world and Jim Marrs has honesty and truth in spades.
As does Professor Jim Fetzer.
The fellow who says Jim "throws all the players into the answer of who did the JFK assassination" doesn't understand that not EVERYONE in the secret service, etc., knew or would approve of the assassination.
ReplyDeleteJim doesn't realize that this guy was trying to NARROW the discussion to the mob; when he asked whether some mob woman was a lover with JFK, he was trying to suggest the "mob" was in all the right places to arrange JFK's death ... ignoring, of course, the idea that there was body manipulation. --- Also, Jim has to stop the guy and get him to REPEAT that Lincoln was killed by a conspiracy. This fellow tries to glibly change the topic all the time.
ReplyDeletePoor Jim, doing our dirty work on the radio -- having to listen to and face these dweebs ... for the betterment of the listeners.
ReplyDeleteDitto what Clare said about the dweebs: Jim shows more capacity for running before the wind than anyone else I know. What a great set-up for the Marss interview!
ReplyDeleteThe interview with Jim Marss was the best interview I've heard with him ever, and I've probably heard hundreds. Hope we can hear him again. My ideal interview would be Jim Fetzer, Jim Marss, and either Peter Levenda or Joseph P Farrell on what Marss and the others call "The Fourth Reich".
... or a program on Operation Golden Lily (of the Japanese army) and the Black Eagle Trust (of the CIA), that may have been used to fund the attacks of 9/11. According to Bob Curtis, who did the early investigations on Japan's plundered gold, Edward Lansdale was an "early player and mover" in the sequestering of the 200,000 metric tons of Chinese gold. Lansdale was a key operative in the Pacific ratlines. His associates include many of the key players in the Pacific-based World Anti-Communist League of, among others, General John Singlaub (of Iran-Contra fame). Lansdale also had to have been deeply involved in the Black Eagle Trust.
DeleteIf you're wandering why the alternative media hasn't been forthcoming about the ultra-right connections to the black budget and the false-flag operations they're used for (just a mysterious "shadow government", right? or maybe "the Jews", right?), you might ponder the ubiquitous influence of the so-called Libertarian "movement" and ask who founded it, and why.
Pease pardon the misspelling: wandering for wondering.
DeleteJim has often mentioned that JFK was forced to use LBJ on the ticket due to force, since LBJ and Hoover had the goods on JFK. How then is it that JFK had made he decision NOT to run with LBJ for his second term?
ReplyDeleteI believe that's because LBJ was headed for jail over crooked dealings with Billy Sol Estes and the Bobby Baker shenanigans.
DeleteQuite simply if JFK had run and won in 64 he could have dumped LBJ and retired Hoover.
DeleteWinning in 64 would have solved JFK's LBJ and Hoover problems. LBJ and Hoover knew this and so they killed JFK.
http://www.change.org/en-CA/petitions/the-state-legislature-of-connecticut-do-not-pass-bill-hb6424-4#share
ReplyDeleteAll JFK had to do was to accept LBJ on the ticket and then when he had won in 1964, which he was sure to do, JFK could have made his excuses and told LBJ that because of rumors about LBJ's "activities" and he (JFK) could have told LBJ that it would be better if gave up the vice-presidency for the good of the party and the country.
ReplyDeleteJFK's next move would have been to pension off Hoover.
LBJ and Hoover knew that one way or another they had to eliminate JFK before the 1964 election and the sooner the better for both of them.
The assassination of JFK wasn't about LBJ. It was about Richard Nixon. LBJ was a clever domestic politician with powerful connections in the oil industry and agribusiness; but, in terms of the global networks and US realpolitik, he was a minor functionary and a placeholder, like Jimmy Carter for Reagan and Bill Clinton for G W Bush--in his case holding the presidential office for Nixon's election in 1968. And that's the real reason LBJ dropped out of the running.
ReplyDeleteResearcher Mae Brussell, in a radio program which aired on November 22, 1981 (18th anniversary of the JFK assassination), disclosed the details of the network that engineered the JFK assassination so that their man, Nixon (who was George H W Bush's mentor and a personal friend of J Edgar Hoover), could be propelled into the White House. Textual notes and bibliography for the program.
Mae Russell YouTube(c) Archive
It was Richard Nixon who told Apollo 11's Buzz Armstrong (allegedly) on the Moon in 1969:"Because of what you have done, the Heavens have become a part of man's World." "Christian"/"Quaker" Richard Nixon, bosom buddy of Billy Graham, didn't know that it was Jesus who held that honor.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteNoam Chomsky and the other fake-liberal gatekeepers/Kennedy disparagers aside, the JFK worshippers do at times go way over the top in praising/"profiling" his supposedly amazing courage in risking assassination via his policy choices.
ReplyDeleteThese warmhearted, teary-eyed folks ought to consider as well that JFK knew he was a doomed man REGARDLESS of what the various Langley Nazis, Zio-nuke boosters, kill-crazy generals, southern segregationists, Cuban fanatics and murderous mobsters might eventually do to him.
Kennedy's dual, terminal-condition afflictions (his bound-to-be-exposed sex addiction and his incurable Addison's Disease) meant that his days of Oval-Office power were to be few -- and he was bound and determined to use whatever time he had left to oppose and strike down every evil faction his fascist father had covertly promised that his sonny boys would assist.
Perhaps it was daddy's bitter realization that he had been snookered by his own rebelious progeny (and was therefore the stooge in a collossal bait-and-switch) that brought on his crippling-and-silencing stroke (if that's REALLY what happened to the old devil).
Glad you got that off your chest.
DeleteNow go lie down in a darkened room for a few weeks.
its a great work has done thanks for sharing and keep it up Online GED Course
ReplyDelete