Great guest, good show. Thanks to you both. This podcast might have been a 'youtube case', as there were many references to pictures, and would of liked to see.do not wish to add to Fetzer task, so if anyone can find a way to make a video production out of this pictures analysis with images..On a different note, but not really off topic. I wonder just how much of our history as been modified? Do we know who we really are?
Freeride:"...if anyone can find a way to make a video production out of this pictures analysis with images.. Try PhotoSlide from DigitByte. You need the full version.Create video photo gallery and add podcast audio.Get it here:http://www.4shared.com/rar/cQ8lmTNF/Photo_SlideShow.html
Thanks Creek, but there is noway I can do this at the present time.
Yeah, It takes ages to synch the photos with the podcast discussion and the resultant video file with the 2 hour audio will be massive in size.Better leave it for now
Yes that's why I tried to 'outsource' it to someone that has the programs, knowledge and time. Plus you should see my setup here, I have to operate the external mouse of my lapy on my leg because the table is too small. To start any type of graphical work in these conditions will result in a disaster. What might facilitate the process (for anyone willing to give it a shot) is to create a time line, just like a subtitle file. Anyway it was just an idea. Might be more feasible and easy to give a link to the pictures?
Link does not work.
I'm pretty sure that Link does work. I swear I saw him down at the local car wash just yesterday scrubbing clean the hub caps of a Lincoln Continental. What a guy that Link is! And such a sense of history, too!!Amazing.....
File not found Firefox can't find the file at http://nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim fetzer real deal-Ralph Cinque re Oswald in the doorway.mp3.
The address for the podcast is.. http://nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim%20fetzer%20real%20deal-Ralph%20Cinque%20re%20Oswald%20in%20the%20doorway.mp3 Might want to reinstall FF ?
The sheer atmosphere of smug arrogance is untolerable in this conversation....some key points1. Nobody either to the WC or after to researchers ever puts Lee Harvey Oswald out front on the stairs.2. We also see in the Weigman film how fast Marion Baker rushes into the TSBD, why upon hearing gunshots did Oswald immediately run upstairs to the lunchroom for a coke?3. Nobody reports seeing Oswald run like a bat out of hell through the main entrance and up the stairs.4. Vicky Adams would likely have met or at least seen Oswald running up the stairs.5. Obfuscated man is clearly a guy in a white shirt whose elbow is pointed at the camera as he shields his eyes.6. If this was a cut and paste job hastily done, there are no evident lines anywhere on this photo unlike the backyard photo where it IS clear.7. All past researchers and Brilliant photo analysts somehow missed all this...but a chiropractor with no background in photography does?8. You have no objective photo expert citing anything anywhere about the validity of your claims.9. Aspect ratio does apply to the positioning of the people on the stairs, also evident in stills of Weigman.10. Ralph seems to think these people are statues and dont move around at all while waiting for the motorcade. The position of anybody especially while in movement, cannot be used to explain anything in this photo as far as arm position, or leaning, or holding a baby...she may habe picked him up seconds before the photo was taken...this is a fraction of a second, a mere sliver captured in time..and doesn't accurately portray the hour or so people were waiting for the motorcade.11. Oswald also told Fritz he went home and changed clothes before going to the theater...so if he did that the shirt he was arrested in would not have been the shirt he wore on the stairs.12. According to Judyth Baker she had just bought him the shirt a couple months prior, hardly enough time for the bottom to get torn and frayed, which likely didn't occur until he struggled with police and was arrested. THe reason lone nutters disagree with you is because Oswald was supposed to be on the 6th floor shooting...the reason CT's disagree with you is that you are flat out wrong, all you have is conjecture and theories not backed up by any real evidence whatsoever or EXPERT analysis, sorry but a philospher of science and a chiropractor/snake oil salesman do not constitute photographic experts. Until you do that, I assure you no one is listening.
Can you supply ONE single piece of credible and irrefutable evidence that puts Lee Harvey Oswald on the 6th floor of the TSBD with a rifle in his hands AT THE TIME the shots were allegedly fired from that location?
conspiracycritic7 wrote:-"Until you do that, I assure you no one is listening"YOU listened.
Creek...I'm not a lone nutter, I never said he was on the 6th floor shooting....and Mogall...I listened to the podcast to hear their latest flawed thinking, but I don't believe their "theory" holds water... its full of holes they never address, its just a giant lap slurping session. Jim hasn't ever done any real research, he's a coattail rider...he latches himself onto whoever he THINKS has a revelation....some do...most dont
Off topic.Senior editor of Veterans Today, Gordon Duff.Was supposed to be about UFOs, but drifted towards Fetzer and JFK in the first hour, among other things. http://www.renseradioarchives.com/harris/ (Date: 03-21-13)An 'out of focus' podcast but overall interesting.
second hour was with Kerry Cassidy :(
Thanks for link!!Very decent and thoughtful of you!!!
ERRATUMthe second hour was NOT with Cassidy. It was with Duff.I downloaded the second hour of the 'Date: 03-21-13' podcast twice yesterday to make sure. They mixed up their podcasts, over at Rense, and it is not the first time I had that happened. The Cassidy podcasts was the 'Date: 03-22-13' show, and it was not there at the time (03-21-13, PM). Hope that they get your shit straight overthere eventually.
Conspiracycritic7 makes some good points. If there were a court appeal to overturn the verdict against Oswald; even if the justices allowed presentation of the photographic evidence by non-experts, the state's attorneys could counter with their own experts - which would compel the justices to dismiss. The appeal simply to public sentiment is always going to be an uphill battle because, unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of the public are conditioned to value authority above evidential appeals to reason. Nevertheless, forums such as this one can bring on board such opinion leaders as are responsive to growing contradictions in the social fabric as they observe them increasing in number. Their influence is minor, but crucial.
" Nevertheless, forums such as this one can bring on board such opinion leaders as are responsive to growing contradictions in the social fabric as they observe them increasing in number. Their influence is minor, but crucial."You talk funny.
I guess I was feeling myself morphed into Major J F Thomas in Breaker Morant as I was writing it. Sometimes I get carried away.
Right click on the green wordsRalph Cinque / Total Infoand save link as........... mp3
I always save/copy the link and play it in another player, but the "Reflections on past shows" with Total Info was simply not in the recording. Maybe it can be put into another show. Some, if not all, of the photos that Jim and Ralph discuss can be found at the Oswald Innocence Campaign site, here. Just one reflection on past shows of my own... In defense of the Beatles, I'd like to point out that their repertoire is enormous. That allowed someone (I don't know whether it was Jim or Total Info) to highlight the show featuring Karen Hudes on the World Bank with the song that begins "You never give me your number: you only give me your funny paper.", which I thought was hilarious.
Define "funny paper" ?
Leave Ralph Cinque alone asswipe
I'll define moron for you = Mark OBlazney
(Right-click on guest name to download mp3)
SUBSCRIBE to the iTunes feed
STREAM premieres on Revere Radio
5pm CST (2300 GMT) M-W-F: