Anyone listening to Pete Santilli's behavior in the interview needs no convincing that he was mentally unstable during the session. The question then arises: was this whole situation a vehicle to discredit Dr Fetzer by a deliberately employed psycho-operational methodology? And that methodology would be this: (1) get a rational guest to appear; (2) during the interview act out irrationally YOURSELF and to an EXTREME, and then (3) hope that an association is created in the minds of the listeners between the interviewee, however rational himself, and the raving lunatic interviewing him, in order to manufacture insanity by association, so to speak.
This comment has been removed by the author.
The video Jim mentioned, "9/11 Conspiracy Solved: Names, Connections, & Details Exposed!", can be viewed (probably in its original posting) at http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/115990/911_Conspiracy_Solved_Names_Connections__Details_Exposed/ - where the author(s) list(s) dozens of sources and links to them for the detailed evidence in the video and refers to the video as a "compilation" of this evidence. It can also be seen at the YouTube(c) channel of "Demoband" here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSapnw_YinE - as well as on other channels. "Black 9/11" seems to have been an earlier version by the same author(s)/compiler(s) (channel of "AlienScientist"): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsDtvu2uTuA
Pete's just committed career suicide, and the terrible irony is that he didn't know anything about Jim Fetzer, or his work, because if he had he would have realized how foolish it was to try to crucify Jim over the nano-thermite case he is famous for rejecting!Pete wouldn't debase his entire credibility as an intellectually honest reporter by suggesting that Jim Fetzer were suppressing the research of Judy Wood, the person Jim embraced and brought before the world, invited on his radio shows over and over again, and even invited to his last 911 conference! Pete would have known that all of these generous acts, of course, famously made Jim a pariah in the eyes of the very 911 truth masses he accuses Jim of misleading.I can see how a person can be unprepared for an interview, but how can Pete have everything so backward, and then speak with such arrogant pomposity as he tries to indict Jim before his audience for cheap hero bragging rights?Was Pete on drugs, some stimulants perhaps, combined with the evil energy wafting off personalities standing behind his throne, urging him on to vilify Jim Fetzer and extract some kind of street justice?Only now am I wondering if Pete's neo-con heritage , his voting for Bush, mean something entirely different in this light. Only now do I question his recent vendetta against Alex Jones. What is the real story behind the person who I once thought showed sparks of independent thought and a refreshing bold approach to uncovering the truth? How pathetic, cruel, and terrible. I will never listen to Pete again. What can you say to someone who says all those cruel and ignorant comments in such a cocksure, arrogant manner? It is unspeakable, truly...And Jim, you are well within your rights to take legal action for what he did... and after acting so nice to your face, and after blackmailing you to remain on the show, he turns on a dime and then tells the world you are an accessory to the crimes of 911, that you are evil, that you are a liar, and that he will take you down one day.I mean, really? When did the truth community fuse with the theater of the absurd? I would laugh if it were not so mean spirited, so destructive to the work of serious scholars who he all groups into ignorant Judy Wood obstructors, and so desperate on his part that he would try to depose a true hero of the truth movement in order to play a mock hero to his insulated ecosystem of fans for one night's show.I am so very sad tonight.I am afraid to admit that after realizing that Pete had no intention of honest dialectical inquiry, you would have been better to just walk off the interview, Jim.I admire you for staying, however, which speaks volumes about your character, Jim, and ultimately reveals the sad truth about Pete's.Now I understand what Vincent Salandria meant... what all truthful souls must endure in their tortured journey to make this world a better place. "We are allowed to believe anything, but to know nothing."I sometimes wonder who is more problematic for our cause, the enemy as we conceive it, or those much closer to us, who wear our own flag and make every pretense to have the sole monopoly on truth and virtue?Whether it be CTKA and their assembly line delivery of hatchet jobs against courageous new voices on JFK, or whether it is Pete Santilli and his self-righteous guardians of 911, I think I have had enough of the truth movement police.
Wow I am trying to listen to Silly Santilli. This guy is a bafoon. First of all he should know that no one can talk over Dr Fetzer just ask that shill Gluck or whatever his name was. I actually thought Pete was a "truther" but he is clearly a dis-info Mossad agent. He claims to be anti-zionist, but is finally revealing his true identity as a counter-intelligence agent for the Israeli Mossad. Pete is a shill and has absolutely no credibility and is just another guy trying to make a name for himself by throwing sticks and stones at the king of alt-media, Alex Jones. Alex may be an agent provacateur, but at least Alex has paved the way for all these shills to run their traps. And at least Alex is a pioneer in the alt-media and 9-11 movement unlike this clown Silly Santilli.Once again, Dr Fetzer you are a true "truther" and we know who the "shills" are they can't hide their identity, their true colors always come out. Keep tearing these new kids on the block a new a--hole!!!
Wow, Dr. Fetzer, I didn't know that you were single-handedly depriving the world of free energy! Seriously, good job trying to school this upstart.
...and my comment above refers to Santilli, of course, not to Mark from Houston. Mark is spot on with his analysis of Jones and Santilli.
First Gluck, now this. It seems somebody is trying to provoke Jim.I wonder who...
This interview was great except for the poor audio quality from the guest. I know you tried to correct it Dr. Fetzer but he kept going back into his muffled mode. Anyway, this was recorded before the interview with Santilli which I heard before this.Santilli is new to AFR and I listened to a few of his shows since Vinny Eastwood and Kevin Barrett were on hiatus. He seemed to be asking good questions about AJ and the Stratfor discovery was pretty interesting in blowing Jones cover. Maybe AJ is on the way out? But when Santilli seemed so gaga for Judy Wood I thought he was a truther novice and needed to catch up big time if he were to challenge AJ. Then this "interview" with Fetzer just blew him out of the water for me. I'm not sure if I can listen to him for a while or at least with very little respect now. Now that interview was a true disaster! Completely unlistenable as Santilli kept talking over Dr. Fetzer. I think Dr. Wood and Andrew Johnson must have brainwashed him to attack Jim. Santilli kept insisting he was being "psy-opd" by Fetzer and would have none of it. Very cultish behaviour indeed. And good on Jim for keeping his word and sticking around for the whole 2 hours. I would love to have heard the banter exchange they had during the commercials breaks!I do like some interviews I have heard with Andrew Johnson on the aspects of Psy-ops but unfortunately, he automatically lumps people who question Dr. Wood's views as Psy-operatives.
The exchange between breaks was not included in the AFR version (which was the broadcast version) or "The Pete Santilli" version (where he added a disparaging intro and altered the sound quality), but they ARE included here. Check 'em out! I thought you were entitled to hear what I had to say to this guy during the breaks.
I've heard them now. Thanks Jim. They were priceless. I think you were still very cordial in the later breaks even though you had been fuming on earlier breaks.It was pretty amazing how this guy would not engage in an exchange of ideas but rather stick to his agenda.
I'm posting this on Wednesday, January 9th, two days after Alex Jones's appearance on Piers Morgan Tonight, so as you can imagine, listening to this podcast after said show was certainly hilarious. Pure comedy and very prophetic: Nice job fellas.In short:Alex Jones hired Molly Maroney as editor for the new Infowars Magazine, that is Silly Santilli's whole angle on Jones. He says he is a "shill," because Maroney is a former CIA Analyst.Alex Jones doesn't like Professor Fetzer becuase Fetzer is a "no planer." Alex Jones is obnoxious toward anyone who contends or may believe in the slightest in the "no plane theory." A monkey flinging his poop at people is less obnoxious than Alex Jones is towards no planers.--PJ
Saying "No planes." is a monkey throwing poop in a most undistinguished manner. It is completely disgusting and leaves stains on the carpet which must be scrubbed out before the stains set, ay Moneypenny?
Speaking of 9/11, in the second hour of the following broadcast there is a discussion of whether the particular floors at the WTC, or particular part of the Pentagon, were targeted and why they might have been if they were. Some of this I had heard before, but much of it was news to me. All in all a unique look at what happened on 9/11. Well worth an hour of your time.http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/621_-_US_Capitalism_From_Start_To_Finish_%28911_As_Endgame_Of_The_Capitalist_Fundamentalists%29
From the link name, the article Dave refers to would seem to present a political view; but in fact the second of the two audio readings (by Robin Upton) at the link target deals strictly with the theory that the motivation behind 9/11 was to facilitate and cover up a financial crime of global, geopolitical proportions. I HIGHLY recommend it. Oddly, Robin Upton's voice and delivery is a dead ringer for Andrew Johnson's (of the Judy Wood cult): perhaps they're just from the same part of the U.K. because, as far as I know, Andrew is not an anarchist. While searching for a PDF copy of the article, I discovered that it's also posted on Scribd (but only the second part), here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/9442970/Collateral-Damage-US-Covert-Operations-and-the-Terrorist-Attacks-on-September-11-200128062008 It was condensed on 911Blogger in 2011 and reposted on Mike Rivero's website the same year. The article is by a certain E.P. Heidner and is apparently an elaboration of a theory set forth by Eastman, Flocco, Durham, & Schwartz. The text of the full article (with 232 footnotes!) and downloadable PDF files of both parts are available here: https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Document:Collateral_Damage_911 Is this E.P. Heidner the same who owns the blogspot at http://epheidner.blogspot.com/ ? Perhaps. As a Dave Emory fan, I have to add that Heidner's theory includes the purported funding of a "Black Eagle Trust" used to support the financial destruction of the Soviet Union and incorporating looted German Nazi and Japanese Mikado capital that was secretly "seized" in WWII. I refer to this aspect because Dave Emory in his radio broadcasts has dealt extensively with this WWII loot. The German loot here: http://spitfirelist.com/books/martin-bormann-nazi-in-exile/ The Japanese here: http://spitfirelist.com/for-the-record/ftr-427-guilding-the-lily-the-japanese-looting-of-asia-in-world-war-ii/
(Right-click on guest name to download mp3)
SUBSCRIBE to the iTunes feed
STREAM premieres on Revere Radio
5pm CST (2300 GMT) M-W-F: