Friday, October 26, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
PLEASE SUPPORT REVERE RADIO:
SUBSCRIBE to the RSS feed
DONATE to Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
---------
(Right-click on guest name to download mp3)
SUBSCRIBE to the iTunes feed
STREAM premieres on Revere Radio
5pm CST (2300 GMT) M-W-F:
---
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteJim, once again you state with respect to planes on 911 something to the effect that planes not scheduled to fly cannot hit buildings and planes no decommissioned until years later could not have crashed. This amazes me. You are a PhD in Philosophy, and yet you exhibit such illogic? Maybe planes not scheduled to fly flew anyway. Maybe planes that crashed were not decommissioned until much later. I know you are plenty intelligent enough to not make these simple errors in logic, so answer this. Why then are you making them?
ReplyDeleteStooy44, I realized your question wasn't directed at me, but allow someone without a PhD in anything to distinguish between logic and substantiation of evidence. There is a standing claim by the Government that an alleged conspiracy involving real and identified aircraft were hijacked and used in the attacks of 9/11/2001. To question THEIR purported evidence with respect to the specific aircraft undermines the logic that supports their official conspiracy theory. Suspecting that this is not an adequate response to your concerns, let me add that an alternative conspiracy theory that includes real airplanes but cannot tell us what substituted for the Government-claimed craft or explain why the Government would dissimulate about the identity of real planes also stands on shaky logical grounds.
ReplyDeleteJim,
ReplyDeleteJust on a trivial matter. Did you know that the term "Irish mafia" used in reference to JFK's Irish coterie is actually spelled 'Irish Murphia"? I found this out reading the book "JFK In Ireland". I had always assumed it was "Irish mafia" but it is actually "Irish Murphia" - a play on the Irish name "Murphy".
You learn something new every day!!
Thankyou atlantabill, your comments make sense. Mr. Fetzer would be well advised to consider them, and suggest something to the effect that the official story has a problem with the records as compared to the planes.
ReplyDeleteStooy44, I'm not completely satisfied with what I said in Dr Fetzer's defense and only realized that after I'd mulled it over. The inconsistencies in the evidence does point back more to the record-keeping than to whether real planes existed. It's so disparaging that we have to deal with questionable videos, photos, and eye-witness accounts - and, of course, blatant Government dissimulation - to answer the planes question. But anyone supporting a theory that includes real planes has to base their theory on the same questionable and discredited evidence. We're lucky that we have other, unassailable evidence supporting the conclusion that the planes were faked - such as the lack of debris and the impossible holes in the North Tower and Pentagon.
ReplyDeleteThanks atlantabill, of course there were no planes, and Mr. Fetzer does a very valuable service to his country and to the world in my opinion.
ReplyDelete