I do not agree with Dr. Fetzer about being open minded and postive about Richard Gage and gang and that perhaps later their thinking can be "fine tuned" to a more correct understanding of where the towers went. Gage and company have been involved in steering and channeling the entire 9-11 truth movement away from the truth and strictly to their orthodoxy. I regard their methods as a form of "the new terrorism." They seem to have had the benefit of sophisticated strategies for channeling the thoughts and controlling the minds of a large number of people. They have been quite successful at that but not at all through their own abilities.
I guess I can see that I will have to be content with an incomplete solving of the WTC Tower destruction mystery realizing that there will never be an independent investigation.
That's correct Jeannon, you will have to be satisfied with an incomplete explanation for the rest of time. No one is even close to the truth.
The mistake you make is discounting what Gage and gang have done to wake people up.
Its far, far, far, far, far more important that people realize that 9/11 was an inside job, than understanding the physical means by which it was done.
Its far more important to understand what did not happen, than what did.
Jeannon's description of the work of Gage and others is suggestive of CIA manipulation as in a "limited hang-out" operation.
For those who may be unfamiliar with the phrase: A 'limited hangout' is when the CIA and its friends admit to some of the truth with the idea of changing the topic, bringing a different focus to the topic or helping to precipitate some other kind of clandestine op or perpetrate a false flag event.
It must never be forgotten that false-flag and limited hang-out operations have been used on many occassions in the past by the US intelligence community. The Gage et al theories could be one such example. Given that possibility we must ask about how best to explain the alleged thermite/nanothermite that has purportedly been found at the WTC site. Possibilities would seem to include:
1) Deliberate Fraud 2) Mistaken Chemical Characterization 3) Interuption of the forensic "chain of evidence" due to the fact that the samples were not gathered/disseminated in a totally transparent way by multiple scientific investigators.
I would like to ask Dr. Wood what she thinks happened to the bodies of people who were in the Twin Towers when they were destroyed. Did they de-materialize into dust as the steel and concrete did or were they partially at least preserved as apparently some were who had been on the ground in an around toasted vehicles.
What does this mean with respect to the goverment's claims that they found remains of many human bodies in the Tower's rubble?
The biggest hurdle in establishing truth is knowing which facts are facts, and which were manipulated/fabricated before they even became known.
It is this reality that plagues all 9/11 research. When forming hypothesis based on information, it is between tough and impossible, to know whether "facts" are real facts, or disinfo.
Its not as if the cover up was rush job, after the fact, it was and had to have been, planned alongside the event itself. The layers of mystery are all but too much for researchers to unravel.
This is why I tell people, all you really need to know is that it wasn't arabs and jet fuel.
PM quotes: "The biggest hurdle in establishing truth is knowing which facts are facts, and which were manipulated/fabricated before they even became known."
"It is this reality that plagues all 9/11 research. When forming hypothesis based on information, it is between tough and impossible, to know whether "facts" are real facts, or disinfo."
Chuck Boldwyn's replys:
It is not impossible to figure out the 911 WTC Complex destruction - even all of it's anomolies if you have the required scientific background and you can see the "big but simple" picture. Just because you, yourself, can not figure out what happened and how it happened, does not mean that some smart, bright scientist can not figure out what happened. Please follow my rebuttals of Judy Wood's 43 points to be explained scientifically on Jim Fetzer's Real Deal shows of which I have completed 10 shows or 20 hours. I will be doing several more to try to educate you and the rest of the world. It is all reallys very simple to explain if you have the required scientific background knowledge, Physics, Chemistry, Engineering, and math, and you have always been inately a problem solver.
Keep listening for my blockbuster educational 911 principles on Jim Fetzer's Real Deal, soon to go to YouTube as videos so my work can get much more exposure.
Great show.
ReplyDeleteI do not agree with Dr. Fetzer about being open minded and postive about Richard Gage and gang and that perhaps later their thinking can be "fine tuned" to a more correct understanding of where the towers went. Gage and company have been involved in steering and channeling the entire 9-11 truth movement away from the truth and strictly to their orthodoxy. I regard their methods as a form of "the new terrorism." They seem to have had the benefit of sophisticated strategies for channeling the thoughts and controlling the minds of a large number of people. They have been quite successful at that but not at all through their own abilities.
I guess I can see that I will have to be content with an incomplete solving of the WTC Tower destruction mystery realizing that there will never be an independent investigation.
I hunger and thirst for justice.
That's correct Jeannon, you will have to be satisfied with an incomplete explanation for the rest of time. No one is even close to the truth.
ReplyDeleteThe mistake you make is discounting what Gage and gang have done to wake people up.
Its far, far, far, far, far more important that people realize that 9/11 was an inside job, than understanding the physical means by which it was done.
Its far more important to understand what did not happen, than what did.
Jeannon's description of the work of Gage and others is suggestive of CIA manipulation as in a "limited hang-out" operation.
ReplyDeleteFor those who may be unfamiliar with the phrase: A 'limited hangout' is when the CIA and its friends admit to some of the truth with the idea of changing the topic, bringing a different focus to the topic or helping to precipitate some other kind of clandestine op or perpetrate a false flag event.
It must never be forgotten that false-flag and limited hang-out operations have been used on many occassions in the past by the US intelligence community. The Gage et al theories could be one such example. Given that possibility we must ask about how best to explain the alleged thermite/nanothermite that has purportedly been found at the WTC site. Possibilities would seem to include:
1) Deliberate Fraud
2) Mistaken Chemical Characterization
3) Interuption of the forensic "chain of evidence" due to the fact that the samples were not gathered/disseminated in a totally transparent way by multiple scientific investigators.
Other options may also exist.
I would like to ask Dr. Wood what she thinks happened to the bodies of people who were in the Twin Towers when they were destroyed. Did they de-materialize into dust as the steel and concrete did or were they partially at least preserved as apparently some were who had been on the ground in an around toasted vehicles.
ReplyDeleteWhat does this mean with respect to the goverment's claims that they found remains of many human bodies in the Tower's rubble?
The biggest hurdle in establishing truth is knowing which facts are facts, and which were manipulated/fabricated before they even became known.
ReplyDeleteIt is this reality that plagues all 9/11 research. When forming hypothesis based on information, it is between tough and impossible, to know whether "facts" are real facts, or disinfo.
Its not as if the cover up was rush job, after the fact, it was and had to have been, planned alongside the event itself. The layers of mystery are all but too much for researchers to unravel.
This is why I tell people, all you really need to know is that it wasn't arabs and jet fuel.
PM quotes:
ReplyDelete"The biggest hurdle in establishing truth is knowing which facts are facts, and which were manipulated/fabricated before they even became known."
"It is this reality that plagues all 9/11 research. When forming hypothesis based on information, it is between tough and impossible, to know whether "facts" are real facts, or disinfo."
Chuck Boldwyn's replys:
It is not impossible to figure out the 911 WTC Complex destruction - even all of it's anomolies if you have the required scientific background and you can see the "big but simple" picture.
Just because you, yourself, can not figure out what happened and how it happened, does not mean that some smart, bright scientist can not figure out what happened.
Please follow my rebuttals of Judy Wood's 43 points to be explained scientifically on Jim Fetzer's Real Deal shows of which I have completed 10 shows or 20 hours. I will be doing several more to try to educate you and the rest of the world.
It is all reallys very simple to explain if you have the required scientific background knowledge, Physics, Chemistry, Engineering, and math, and you have always been inately a problem solver.
Check out my work at 911Scholars.ning.com
http://911scholars.ning.com/photo/photo/listForContributor?screenName=0j41yn9psh0j2
http://911scholars.ning.com/video/video/listForContributor?screenName=0j41yn9psh0j2
http://911scholars.ning.com/profile/ChuckBoldwyn
Keep listening for my blockbuster educational 911 principles on Jim Fetzer's Real Deal, soon to go to YouTube as videos so my work can get much more exposure.
Chuck Boldwyn