It's Patriotic Duty To Endorse Christian Anti-SemitismWell James, I really liked ur guest who, I found, was one of those naïve sort, who's yet so honest that he actually gives most interesting, substantial info.One of the neat things he pt'd out was that in the "truther" meetings he noted explicitly some "Jew" would begin to essentially disrupt any progress, the Jew typically bleating about "anti-Semitism," etc. I note u acknowledged quite readily, ho ho ho ho.Prof., u gotta face-up to the truth, the dirty-low-down--it TRULY IS Jews that's core of the satanic problem w. USA. And ONLY way to deal w. this satanic-Jew problem is the REAL Christianity, featuring (a) TRUTH as topmost virtue/principle, the only way to Godly happiness (Gosp. JOHN 14:6), opposing Jew lies (JOHN 8:44).(b) And people gotta be honest enough to grasp Christianity as anti-Semitic. To be sure, gentiles can be satanic too, but they're not nearly as organized as Jews who are the "glue," so to speak, which holds the satanic movement together--any Satanist who fails to toe party line put out by Jew masters is easily dealt-with, it seems.Note then Christian TRUTH necessarily implies the objective (Aristotelian) reality, as only it serves as basis for "TRUTH."The other thing u gotta realize, I submit, is that moralism/Pharisaism is the WEAK-PT. which allows Jew/Satanists to taking-over, psychologically, these Satanists presently manipulating the SCHIZOIDS so easily and effectively.Perfect example of schizoids on this blog of urs is "one-born-brainless" and "911TruthNC." Schizoids have difficulty discerning concretes fm abstracts, remember.But to conclude here, the main, fundamental pt. is to oppose the Jews, the more explicit the better, but for ur google blog, u probably don't want to go further than "Zionism," like Chris Bollyn. Jew/Satanists thus make use of the schizoid psychosis--by means of using moralism/Pharisaism, applying it in trendy modes as for "hip-hop music," etc. Of course, even this moralism/Pharisaism tool for manipulating schizoids itself still requires the fiat-money & central-banking system for bribery, corruption, etc.Note this Satanist psych manipulation can't and wouldn't work without that legalized COUNTERFEITING scam, the Fed--they necessarily go together.Note finally, dear Christianity--the REAL thing--is actually perfectly comportable w. purest reason as it endorses TRUTH TRUTH TRUTH above all/any other precept(s). U can't prove universal negative, so note there's no problem w. "God" idea, most useful for relating w. the broad public which needs leadership.
Soudy Brings Out Best From Fetzer For Leadership--Aside From Science, InvestigationJames: one more thing (at least) to be noted for ur excellent guest, Mr. Soudy, is he's so nearly desperate and emphatic for some kind of a leader-type, like urself, as he indicated.Note Prof., Soudy is brilliant intellect in his way, and he's not idly appealing to u to exert this leadership role--he makes excellent pt. for this NECESSITY of leadership. U nobly begged-off for any ability to too easily getting on the Jews-media--they, of course, would NEVER allow that, esp. fm the likes of u w. enclopedic knowledge, as of JFK conspiracy, etc.Finally, the ONLY specific criticism I'd make is u most probably SHOULD NOT worry too much about whether it was "nukes" or DEWs--for it could have been both--along w. more conventional explosives.Observe the amazing anomalies involved in 9/11--including esp. the Bankers Trust Bldg which was heavily affected as Judy Wood pt.s out--surely it wasn't nuke responsible for that.And note u have tremendous base of INDUCTIVE evidence to work fm and with, including now JFK and Sandy Hook to make compelling case against ZOG and then especially its literal satanic nature. In view of the Jews-media involvement in all these conspiracies, the satanic angle shouldn't be too difficult to pt.-out.Thus it would be remiss to overlook and neglect the Christian weapon/instrument by which to attract and persuade the broad public--and to doing it in perfectly rationalist method which would comport w. ur own principles.Mr. Soudy then would be well gratified for his honest, yet still astute appeal to u for ur leadership, good professor--note he appreciates ur talent in a way u might not have expected. Soudy was truly most excellent interview and interlocutor.
Good lead this NYT article. I had forgotten about this complaint by the commission. Ibrahim Soudy is an intelligent and well-meaning man and he makes some good points but I think he is a bit naive. You, Jim, have gone far and beyond the call of duty in publicizing 9/11 and appearing in the media and we know how unreasonable the MSM can be. You have done more than your share. What I see lacking is the failure to acknowledge other work such as September Clues and evidence such as the archived video footage of the WTC. I think a forum like this is a good place to come together in cooperation, share information and debate the evidence.THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORTStonewalled by the C.I.A. - New York Times MORE than five years ago, Congress and President Bush created the 9/11 commission. The goal was to provide the American people with the fullest possible account of the “facts and circumstances relating to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001” — and to offer recommendations to prevent future attacks. Soon after its creation, the president’s chief of staff directed all executive branch agencies to cooperate with the commission. The commission’s mandate was sweeping and it explicitly included the intelligence agencies. But the recent revelations that the C.I.A. destroyed videotaped interrogations of Qaeda operatives leads us to conclude that the agency failed to respond to our lawful requests for information about the 9/11 plot. Those who knew about those videotapes — and did not tell us about them — obstructed our investigation.There could have been absolutely no doubt in the mind of anyone at the C.I.A. — or the White House — of the commission’s interest in any and all information related to Qaeda detainees involved in the 9/11 plot. Yet no one in the administration ever told the commission of the existence of videotapes of detainee interrogations. When the press reported that, in 2002 and maybe at other times, the C.I.A. had recorded hundreds of hours of interrogations of at least two Qaeda detainees, we went back to check our records. We found that we did ask, repeatedly, for the kind of information that would have been contained in such videotapes........cont'd.(Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton served as chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the 9/11 commission.)http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/opinion/02kean.html?_r=0
I think we "lay" people should have our own group. I think we have done a much better job sorting out 9/11 than the professional groups have.This comment section could be a forum if it were monitored better so that off-topic material would be taken down. I like this format as it is current and easy to read.
This comment section is actually pretty good, I'd say--I have great fun here, ho ho ho. "Off topic"?--just stuff u don't like, eh?
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ToA/Complete Book: "THE TAKING OF AMERICA, 1-2-3", 1985 (This is the best book on how the CIA took over the second inquiry into JFK--the House Select Committee on Assassinations. See the chapters below:)The Select Committee on Assassinations, The Intelligence Community and The News Media The Final Cover-Up: How The CIA Controlled The House Select Committee on Assassinations
The 9/11 Commission Report reads like a novel. (See below.) Thanks to David Ray Griffin and his early books which analyzed the Report, we also know the tie-in to the PNAC. Kevin Barrett has updated us on that powerful group.____________________________National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/ "WE HAVE SOME PLANES" "Reports from two flight attendants in the coach cabin, Betty Ong andMadeline “Amy” Sweeney, tell us most of what we know about how thehijacking happened. As it began, some of the hijackers—most likely Wail alShehri and Waleed al Shehri,who were seated in row 2 in first class—stabbed
9/11 PNAC perps still whining for US to fight Israel’s wars | Veterans Today by Kevin BarrettYou may have heard that the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) no longer exists. Officially, that notorious group of 9/11 suspects, which called for a “New Pearl Harbor” on September 11th, 2000 and got one exactly one year later, disbanded in 2006.David Ray Griffin’s book The New Pearl Harbor – which lifted its title from PNAC’s infamous “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” memo endorsing the 9/11 attacks one year before they occurred – is widely credited with driving a stake through PNAC’s black heart.But what you may not have heard is that PNAC is back under a new name: FDD, the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. And wouldn’t you know it, they’re still trying to trick Americans into fighting wars for Israel. This time, their target is Iran.FDD, the new name for PNAC, just issued a 155-page report calling for the US to “increase Iranian isolation, including through regime change in Syria” and “undertake…overt preparations for the use of warplanes and/or missiles to destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities with high explosives”. (Source: Antiwar.com)Got that? The same group widely viewed as responsible for the immolation of 3,000 Americans on 9/11 in order to con the US into smashing Israel’s enemies is shamelessly calling for more death and destruction – all paid for, of course, with your tax dollars.If there were any doubts that FDD is just the new name for PNAC, they’re dispelled by this list compiled by the moderator at DemocratsForProgress.comPNAC =Elliott Abrams Gary Bauer William J. Bennett Jeb Bush Dick Cheney Eliot A. Cohen Midge Decter Paula Dobriansky Steve Forbes Aaron Friedberg Francis Fukuyama Frank Gaffney Fred C. Ikle Donald Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad I. Lewis Libby Norman Podhoretz Dan Quayle Peter W. Rodman Stephen P. Rosen Henry S. Rowen Donald Rumsfeld Vin Weber George Weigel Paul Wolfowitz Richard L. Armitage Jeffrey Bergner John Bolton Robert Kagan William Kristol Richard Perle William Schneider, Jr. R. James Woolsey Robert B. Zoellickwww.newamericancentury.org/statem…ciples.htm www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm www.newamericancentury.org/iraqletter1998.htm
I came to think of a boring theory. That building 7 was brought down on purpose, not because of some conspiracy but as a safety measure. The idea is that skyscrapers are built to be able to collapse like that for safety reasons. And it's classified information in order to not alarm the public about such a drastic safety mechanism which purpose is to prevent skyscrapers from tipping sideways into the city and to prevent them from collapsing halfway which would be very dangerous too.
I dare say I think you are right.
"WHAT HAPPENED ON 9/11 - IN REALITY?"http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2391810#p2391810