Great. I love William Shanley. By the way, guy, John Wells is a good guy, but he isn't nuanced on the Israel stuff, and has had thus far(to be generous, a distorted view of geopolitics). I think he might have some Israelli assistance with his show or those sympathetic. I do not mean to imply he is a shill, not at all, but rather he has been manipulated into adopting certain ideological framings devised by counterintelligence types, usually the ones that say Russia is going to invade, China is evil, etc. Like Alex Jones he gets very uncomfortable when addressing the Israel issue and brings up old canards and addresses old distinctions that, quite frankly, most people get anyway. To put it in persspective, two top Hollywood actors wrote a public letter denouncing the Gaza genocide, and they have been blackballed according to newspaper articles. As long as John keeps his foot in those waters, he is not going to find the truth. Even British MPs have denounced Gaza and John says he doesn't know what's going on? No, conflict if interest, as with Alex Jones. Contrast John's knowledge and subtlety with that of Josh Blakeny. I think the middle East show is a good idea, but with the right people. I wish I heard more of William Shanley tonight because he has wisdom; it resonates with me. That is a fine man I would like to meet one day. Thank you all for your courage and for pushing the envelope. I love this show and the more conversations and subject matter, the better. I adore Jim Fetzer because he is a true scientist, a true thinker, unencumbered by paradigms and with an energy and drive and moral compass to put his whole to good use. May we all emulate those virtues.
jim you might be interested in this.....more hoax on the other side of the pond http://chrisspivey.org/the-high-cost-of-free-speech/
This comment has been removed by the author.
Solfeggio said:...."By the way, guy, John Wells is a good guy, but he isn't nuanced on the Israel stuff, and has had thus far(to be generous, a distorted view of geopolitics). I think he might have some Israelli assistance with his show or those sympathetic. I do not mean to imply he is a shill, not at all, but rather he has been manipulated into adopting certain ideological framings devised by counterintelligence types,....." John Wells is a media personality. IMO, he was very uncomfortable with the entire show because of the tremendous outing of the corrupt, lying media by Fetzer and Halbig. Wells nearly lost it when Fetzer made a few comments on the ongoing genocide by Israel in Gaza. Fetzer had to calm him down with the suggestion they discuss the Israeli/Palestinian issue on another show. I don't think there will be a show on that, at least not a fair and honest one, because Wells needs to keep his job with the Zionist-controlled media in the US. You simply cannot allow anyone to make negative remarks on Israeli policy in public. I thought this was the best show so far on Sandy Hook. Everything has been analyzed and articulated. The US is being terrorized by its own government so that bills and legislation may be passed without the consent of the people. Watergate was nothing compared to this.
Based on this interview, I would be very wary of this John Wells guy. He sounded like a Zionist propaganda shill to me.
Aspterian lacks comprehension skills too.Nice that all the fake comments come in waves at a time.
I did not say that.
Here's 2 1/2 min vid of Gordon Duff admitting about 40% of stuff he publishes at VT is lies--he says he's gotta do it or "they" will kill him--at least he's honest liar, eh? Ho ho hoho ho ho: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m-ZY0R1HdQ
The British Empire funded and took down the WTCs to rip off the insurance underwriters' investments and maintain the center of world finance in London. Prove me wrong. Start with who funded it and where the 3 years of R&D were carried out.
Gordon is another matter. I used to dig him, but his performance on Red Ice does not promote VT. Instead his arogant demeanor and contradictions along with his generous appeals to inside information (a fallacy ) undermines him. He is no ambassador to the more serious work at VT, and he could have described his nuke articles or gave reasons for his unique fondness for Obama, but he didn't and the interview, like so many others, leaves many scratching their heads.John Welks, upon leaving Coast, had me excited. But his first guest in his new show was a Zionist of some persuasion doing the whole pseudo-whistleblower thing, and next thing you know, I think there is a commie under every bed. My generation doesn't respond to that old propaganda, so calling Obama out as this individual tyrant instead if a puppet, a communist instead of a capitalist, and so forth... I was so upset I write him a thoughtful letter he will never read but I do think there is a nice guy there but also one who has yet to question the key paradigms because he knows which way the wind is blowing. This I don't like truth tellers who are in fact censored or misdirecting, even if unwittingly. But he does seem to care about the problems, but seems to have really been let go from coast because he goes on Obana witch hunts or seems to pander to the right. And on a show for Anerucsns, where are not right it left, that is a problem. I don't think he was fired for being a martyr to truth although Coast is sanitized rubbish. Even great JFK scribe and actor promoting Body Count, went in Coast and indulged in a jingoistic rant about how terrible Hitker was and how great that war was. So these people either believe that stuff or they have to play the game, like when Oliver Stone had to apologize for saying the Jews run the World or they would scrap his mini- series.