Friday, February 13, 2015
The Death of Diana
The show begins with a look at the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, in Paris, which provides the standard "mainstream media" account of the accident and its circumstances. It follows with an extensive interview with John Morgan, who is the world's leading expert on her death, which makes clear that this was not an automobile accident but a cleverly-planned assassination. John Morgan reveals that the crash in the tunnel appears to have been orchestrated by MI6 on the orders of senior British Royals. Princess Diana survived the crash but was brutally murdered by deliberate mistreatment in the ambulance by people who were supposed to be saving her.
His book, How They Murdered Princess Diana, shows that the 2007-8 London inquest into the deaths – headed by Lord Justice Scott Baker – was one of the most inept and corrupt inquests in the history of the British judicial system. It also exposes the 2004-6 Scotland Yard Paget investigation as a farce dedicated to covering up what occurred rather than to uncovering truth. The perps never thought anyone would or could ever do a full investigation piecing it all together – but this is exactly what John Morgan has done. This event was a state-sponsored murder of one of the most beloved celebrities in the world, Diana, Princess of Wales.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
more fakery jim. you missed 9/11 and 7/7.
ReplyDeleteyou can at least examine the possibility here and go through the evidence gathered.
the rich don't kill their own. they only pretend to.
Lady DIANA SPENCER, A Limo And An Underpass: What Happened?
http://letsrollforums.com/lady-diana-spencer-limo-t28930.html
The rich certainly do kill their own.
Deletecan't be bothered much anymore but the last few pages in the above thread are especially interesting with Diana (isis) connecting to the arc de triumph connecting to 9/11 and to Sirius or the dog star.
ReplyDeleteregards to all.
J.Fetzer said : "This event was a state-sponsored murder of one of the most beloved celebrities in the world, Diana, Princess of Wales."
ReplyDelete" a state-sponsored murder "
Well, duh!
This is what states do, all the time, fer chrissakes! Always have, always will.
Hundreds of years ago some guy apparently called "Shakespeare" wrote popular plays about these types of historical goings on.
Whats the big deal here ? Whether she was really "bumped off" or not, the Diana "removal" story is essentially no different from what I said in the previous [JFK] show comment section; you just have to replace the JFK moniker with the Diana moniker.
You can all sit around and ignore the elephant in the room [ie the state/government], perhaps pretending its not there, or perhaps, that its really "good" ,and "essential" etc etc., as both it , and most here "trumpet", while it steals your money and counterfeits large amounts of what it cannot steal, or, you can at the least come to an understanding of the fundamental, unchangeable, wholly criminal true nature of all states/governments past, present, or future..
My guess is that you will mostly all [including apparently "foaming at the mouth" left-wing apologist for the state J. Fetzer, plus C Kuehn and A Tyme , S. Corr etc. etc.] keep that blindfold firmly in place:-)
And so it goes :-)
Regards, onebornfree.
The Freedom Network:
http://www.freedominunfreeworld.blogspot.com/
You've simply become fanatic, OBF. Full consideration of the 9/11 case indicates that media lies were only part of it, nor were complete in themselves.
DeleteStates and all other forms of human organization, including families, have versions of lies and deaths and abuses -- hating the purpose of any of the organizing groups is a separate issue. A state is a protection as much as it can be corrupt.
DeleteDear One Born Free,
DeleteI was enormously impressed that you mentioned (in these precise words) "some guy apparently called 'Shakespeare.'" It is always easy to rush these internet posts, but you took special care with your word choices and phrasing.
You are spot on perfect in questioning the traditional story of the authorship of Shakespeare's plays and poems. The man from Stratford with no evidence of having an education and no evidence of being a writer (except for six illegible signatures) could not have written the greatest literary works in the English language. After years of studying and teaching this topic, I am convinced that the true author is Edward de Vere, the Seventeenth Earl of Oxford.
I spent a very memorable evening discussing this fascinating topic with Professor Fetzer on "The Real Deal." The program entitled "Shakespeare: The Oxfordian Theory" from November 7, 2011, is archived at this site on Jim's list of programs:
http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2011/11/james-norwood.html
Finally, you are also correct in asserting that the author "Shakespeare" wrote about state-sponsored murders. This was the author who actually coined our word "assassination" (in the play "Macbeth”). And the only way he could depict those murders as realistically as he did was through his insider knowledge and experience as a courtier. He could not have portrayed the mindset of the power elite from reading books or hearing gossip. It came from direct observation and experience of the environment of the Tudor court, which, to put it mildly, was known for its violence and bloodlust.
Lady Emilia Bassano Lanier may have been the real bard too.
DeleteIt seems odd that perps never thought anyone would piece it together; rather, it does not matter if we do, except in the long view of history, when another culture can say we did it.
ReplyDeleteClare Kuehn wrote:
ReplyDelete"You've simply become fanatic, OBF. Full consideration of the 9/11 case indicates that media lies were only part of it, nor were complete in themselves."
Huh? Let me see...WHERE does OBF mention "the media" in his above post, Miss Kuehn? (hint: NOWHERE). Hmm - so was this just a little - uh - 'freudian slip' of yours, (un)Clare dear? Not a surprising one, come to think of it - considering the monstrous state-media-military octopus which sponsors this place. Small wonder then that, given your nebulous nature and writing style, your mind sometimes stumbles in its own primordial haze.
Loved it, though - thanks! :-D
Simon Shack
@Simon Shack:
ReplyDeleteHey Simon, I see from your site posts that you liked my two video links posted in the recent JFK thread:-).
I'm continually fascinated by the outraged denial and "pretzel logic"exhibited by persons who, while on the one hand are able to at least understand that events such as 911, JFK, Apollo etc etc. are almost entirely [and usually quite obviously] of their own governments doing, are, once the criminal nature of that entity is pointed out to them, completely unable to process and accept what is right in front of them, staring them all in the face, and to then move on to what should be fairly obvious conclusions regarding the true nature of their very own government[s].
This psychological "blocking", or denial, to me seems essentially no different from the over-the-top hysterical reaction of outraged denial persons both here and elsewhere almost always have regarding the [in hindsight] glaringly obvious fraudulence of all of the 9/11 "live" MSM footage, once that fact has been repeatedly and consistently pointed out to them [and again, thank you very much Simon for your incredible research : http://www.cluesforum.info/ ] .
My guess is that most here, although superficially understanding the state's direct involvement and orchestration of these types of events , are unable , [or unwilling?] to travel "further down the rabbit hole", or to step through the wide open doorway that those events ,and others similar, have revealed.
And so it goes.
Video: "Try to Explain Government to An Alien ":
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/02/try-to-explain-government-to-alien.html
Short video: "Government = The Most Dangerous Religion ":
http://onebornfree-mythbusters.blogspot.com/2014/09/government-most-dangerous-religion.html
Regards, onebornfree.
The Freedom Network:
http://www.freedominunfreeworld.blogspot.com/
James Norwood said : "Dear One Born Free, I was enormously impressed that you mentioned (in these precise words) "some guy apparently called 'Shakespeare.'" It is always easy to rush these internet posts, but you took special care with your word choices and phrasing. "
ReplyDeleteThanks for noticing, James. Regarding the "real" author of the Shakespeare plays, personally I have no firm convictions, mostly because I do not see it as a particularly important issue, in "the big scheme of things", however I also currently lean towards the idea that de Vere was the actual author.
I had reached those tentative conclusions a few [10?] years ago via the musings of the late, great, Joe Sobran, a conservative writer turned anarchist:
"The Reluctant Anarchist":
http://www.sobran.com/reluctant.shtml
..who was also happened to be very interested [infatuated?] with identifying the actual authorship of the Shakespeare works.
"The Shakespeare Library":
http://www.sobran.com/oxfordlibrary.shtml
Regards, onebornfree.
The Freedom Network:
http://www.freedominunfreeworld.blogspot.com/
Albeit he soared with undaunted wing?
ReplyDeleteHast thou not dragged Diana from her car?
Edgar Allan Poe
What Fetzer seems to do on numerous issues is surmise something is true, let it incubate in his head for a week then proclaim it as fact from that point on. Diana being beaten to death in the ambulance is the latest example. "Absolutely ridiculous!"
ReplyDeleteThis barryb appears to be a nitwit. Diana was fine after the crash and scored near the bottom for severity of effects. The ambulance was on the scene for an hour, but took an hour and forty-five minutes to get her to the hospital, where she would die within five minutes of her admission. But the ambulance stopped for some time a short distance away--and was observed rocking back and forth. I would take a numbskull to fail to draw the inference that she was beaten to death in the ambulance by the infliction of internal injuries calculated to bring her death about from internal bleeding. barryb is welcome to discuss these issues any time, but it is obvious to me he is not looking for truth. One of us may be "ridiculous", but that would not be me. Listen to the show again if anyone has any doubt about what I have said about this--which follows from John Morgan's work.
DeleteIf the ambulance rocked, it could have been from other inside activity apart from beating. However, my comment was unfair, nasty and not representative of my view on the important and excellent work you do. I let temporary anger, personal frustration and other biases motivate my response.
Delete