Wednesday, September 11, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
PLEASE SUPPORT REVERE RADIO:
SUBSCRIBE to the RSS feed
DONATE to Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
---------
(Right-click on guest name to download mp3)
SUBSCRIBE to the iTunes feed
STREAM premieres on Revere Radio
5pm CST (2300 GMT) M-W-F:
---
First, thank you Jim for having this guest and let him tell is story even though you disagreed.
ReplyDeleteThen, congratulations on having the patience to deal with his evasive answers, often changing the subject, from Black Beard to him playing football as a child, instead of him saying I DON'T KNOW to certain points. He annoyed me more than once.
Then this at 32:50.. "I must say that it's a distinctive characteristic of scientific reasoning that when you encounter new evidence or new hypotheses you may have to undertake a re-evaluation of the conclusion you previously adopted, where you may have reject conclusions you previously accepted, accept conclusions you previously rejected and leave others in suspend." - Jim Fetzer
Howard, brings very important info on how the planes, that were not commercial jetliners, could enter those buildings the way they did. I have suspected that the steel structure behind the aluminum facade, was not only rusted but rotten, because the water (humidity/condensation/rain infiltration) was trapped in between both layer of materials. So the steel at point of impact was not even 1/4 of an inch thick, like previously thought. Not much resistance left for the plane to enter in pieces.
As for the demolition of the buildings. If, there is a bomb under the >center core<, wouldn't the result be what we can see on the videos, which is that from an external point of observation, it would appear as if the towers were demolished from the top down, when what is really happening is that the center bottom was blown away, pulling everything down?
"As for the demolition of the buildings. If, there is a bomb under the >center core<, wouldn't the result be what we can see on the videos, which is that from an external point of observation, it would appear as if the towers were demolished from the top down, when what is really happening is that the center bottom was blown away, pulling everything down?"
DeleteDon't forget the (apparent) lateral hurling of steel girders and debris though. We are not only seeing materials being "pulled down." I think there's still another energetic force there.
Mick, the girders were supporting the floors inside the buildings. To have them shoot out would be very strange indeed. Could you dig me up a photo or video? As for the outside structure falling outwards, with some parts embedding themselves into adjacent buildings, as seen in pictures, I do not see it as being outside of what is possible, considering the height of those buildings. I would also expect some parts being catapulted out of the buildings, as steel has some spring to it, but girders being sandwiched in between floors, that is where my imagination stops.
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgN080yySe0
DeleteI must have misspoken with the term "girders," however, as shown in this video there is much evidence of other explosive forces, and yes I was referring to the embedding of exterior building parts into neighboring structures. Probably/hopefully we've all seen Chandler's excellent video. If not, please share. A good entre for the 'conspiracy theorist' skeptic.
no, Chandler misspoke in his video when saying 'girders' referring to the outside structure, misleading you in the process. Girders, trusses and bar joist, are used as light weight supports for roofs and floors. They replace 'i' beams with certain conditions. The guy doesn't know what he is talking about, but sounds credible and ppl don't know any better.
DeleteThank you for the link, and I'm very familiar with that vid. The so called "squibs" or "explosions" are a result of the building being demolish from the bottom core, or bellow that. Not the cause. What I do see and have been seeing is falling parts and debris. If those were demolition squibs and explosions, the outside structure would of fallen straight down, like a normal controlled demolition, but what can be observed is uncontrolled parts falling outwards.
So I'm gonna stick with my version for now, that the cores were 'blown' bellow or, what they were sitting on was blown away, pulling everything down with it. That jives with that video, and it is what I would expect to see if the towers would loose their core footing, and when Rodriguez says "an explosion pushes us upwards", and the twisted 'i' beams, and the firemen reporting seeing "lava" in the basement, and the account of Howard, and the jumpers because it was too hot, and problems building new buildings at ground zero...
"Could you dig me up a photo or video?"
DeleteWhy don't you go dig up your mother? Again!!
My latest attempt to explain these things was during The Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAEvw2CjAYQ
DeleteALL of you guys pay more attention to yourselves than you do the buildings. Study the blueprints if you can find any and then read my comments until your eyes bleed.These were EXTREMELY radical designs with EVERY bug worked out except the Rockefeller/Rothschild defect.
DeleteFreeride, YES, the exterior perimeter steel panels were rotting, and the aluminum siding facades turned to dust at the steel fasteners, and falling apart. THIS factor set the timing for the trillion+ dollar fraud by the Bush/Rockefeller/British royal attack and fraud.
DeleteYou can disapprove of historical fact, but you can not argue with it. My heart and loyalty goes out to the families of the victims. My interview was removed by swine.
DeleteDoesn't this sound like Howard "creating" this story back in 2007? Check out this link...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message430197/pg1
No you're just weird with 0 investigative skills. Not the same person, and I could tell you why. Instead I will let you figure it out.
DeleteThank you. Now I know who I am... and now I know a little bit more about you, too.
Deletesince you can't figure it out, might as well point you in the right direction.. 1:11 "he died in 1992". Now we're all waiting for your "I'M SO STUPID! WHY DIDN'T I FIGURE THAT OUT BEFORE POSTING" moment. Stay tuned..
DeleteHe claims his father died at 44 in 1992 (do you believe it?) Just before that he states "Last I heard he was actually teaching at the University of Washington...in construction management" An odd thing to say for someone who has been deceased for over two decades.
DeleteAccording to Howard's VT bio he states that he himself was born in 1953... that would put his dad at 5 years old at the time of his birth... also he would have been about 15 years old when he is doing all this research for his dad and inventing systems to protect the bathtub.... Believable?
Of, course you probably believed Condi when she said they never would have suspected an attack on WTC... or GW when he was supposedly watching the planes hit on TV.
I ask you... "NOW WHO"S STUPID?"
Sorry for the confusion. Dad was born before 1928 and passed 1992. I was born 1953.
DeleteDad's spirit took a severe beating over the incorporation of the Kellogg fusion devices into the Manhattan edifice. He KNEW at the time what they intended to do to kill a large number of people, and we tried to tell EVERYBODY from friends to congressional offices since mid1969. No luck. The military that I personally contacted told me that they already knew, way back in 1970-1971. Somebody set it off but NOBODY is man enough to tell us WHO ORDERED IT.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHoward's story has some merit. Concrete has a relatively low tensile strength which is why reinforcing steel/mesh is used. If the reinforcing were coated with a thermitic paint and a reaction destroyed the bond between concrete and steel, it would go a long way toward explaining the pulverization of the concrete. As an engineer who has spent many a day on a jack-hammer, I can testify that concrete doesn't just turn to dust in mid-air. This is not the first time I've heard that the towers were designed to facilitate demolition.
ReplyDeleteNONE of the cement was "pulverized". It ALL was a resin based cement denatured by extremely high temperature radioactive isotope enrichment. To quote 3 of the experimental system engineers 1967-1969, "Like 1,100 foot tall breeder reactors." Not theory.
DeleteThe only way to demolish a modern steel skyscraper is with nuclear explosives. So, since this law has been in effect for decades, what is all the fuss about? The WTC engineers had to submit plans for demolishment.
ReplyDeleteNuclear Demolition of Skyscrapers
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_uranium26.htm
[D]espite common misconception, it is not possible to demolish a steel-frame building by a commonly known controlled demolition (implosion) scheme. In bygone days when buildings were brick-walled and concrete-paneled, their bearing structures used to be concrete supporting columns and concrete supporting girders........
However, it is no longer possible with modern steel-framed buildings - such as, for example former Twin Towers of the New Your World Trade Center, World Trade Center building # 7, or the Sears Tower in Chicago.
However, in accordance with the US laws governing construction of skyscrapers buildings designers had to submit some satisfactorily demolition project before their construction project could be approved by the Department of Buildings. No one could be allowed to build a skyscraper that can't be demolished in the future.
*This is the main point of the skyscrapers' in-built nuclear demolition features.
Anyhow, "Controlled Demolition Inc." began to study possibilities of demolishing modern skyscrapers by underground nuclear explosions at the end of 60s, at request of the then New York State Governor Nelson Rockefeller - when it became necessary to get a legal approval from the New York Department of Buildings for the WTC Twin Towers construction.
After some research, a final solution was found and approved by the Department of Buildings and "Controlled Demolition Inc." got its nuclear demolition know-how patented.
Joan Edwards, thanx, buddy.JEdwards, A+++ Your report is accurate. Please take special note of the FACT that in the contracts, the Rockefellers DEMANDED that "ALCHEMY" was to be the field of research to solve the anticipated structural steel/aluminum siding interface corrosion problem. This was presented at a meeting in NYC before construction, and the document specification actually shoved in my face for evaluation by an extremely pissed off contract manager yelling at me about the "imbeciles" he had to work with. Since the David and Nelson Rockefellers were not imbeciles, failure of this structural detail must, by me at least, be considered 'cause to believe' the Rockefellers wanted this incurable defect incorporated into the original design, leading to premature failure. THIS, no matter what all these other fools say, was the real reason for the time frame for the demolition. It was mentioned in construction journals that the aluminum was becoming fatally corroded and was beginning to fall off 30 years later, right on schedule. Then the 'asbestos problem' became the advertised controversy. My bet is that a Rockefeller research facility came up with 'asbestos' as a serious problem. Recent studies show asbestos cancers as virtually nonexistent in Manhattan due to any 9-11-2001 exposure. However, there were MANY thousands of radioactivity caused cancers from this time in Manhattan.
DeleteDanny Jowenko's expert father was part of the demolition design team, and I am sure was NOT involved in the treachery.
DeleteJL Hudson building in Detroit is a large steel frame building demolished without nukes?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.controlled-demolition.com/jl-hudson-department-store
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SxwNW4yMs8#t=50
http://www.controlled-demolition.com/jl-hudson-department-store
ReplyDelete"Only 33 stories high, built between 1911 and 1925," this was steel AND concrete, unlike the WTC which were mostly steel. (The only concrete was poured into the steel floor pans, 4" deep.)
You can see why in the sixties, with skyscrapers going up everywhere, mostly made of all steel , the building code was changed to include a plan to safely demolish the buildings should it become necessary.
The main problem is with the debris. The WTC literally turned to dust--steel dust as opposed to the concrete dust we see in conventional demolitions.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"CDI had to sever the steel in the columns and create a delay system which could simultaneously control the failure of the building’s 12 different structural configurations,.........
.......while trying to keep the hundreds of thousands of tons of debris within the 420 ft by 220 ft footprint of the structure.
NASDI’s 21 man crew needed three months to investigate the complex and four months to complete preparations for CDI’s implosion design.......
When the dust cleared, a debris pile averaging 35 ft tall and as high as 60 ft tall where the tower had stood was all that remained
It was not conventional silica based concrete poured into those pans. It was a synthetic based RESIN material, perhaps with a filler like vermiculite as one commentor mentioned.
DeleteThis resin based material WAS NOT PULVERIZED. It was denatured in a freon atmosphere, per Kellogg Corporation design.
Deletehttps://wikispooks.com/wiki/Document:Collateral_Damage_911#The_War_Chest
ReplyDelete~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Also brought up by Howard Lewis III was this motive for 9/11: Has Jim interviewed on this topic? I read a lot about Leo Wanta and the money he was to have saved the US with having to do with the Russians.
Document:Collateral Damage 911 - WikiSpooks
This article provides research into the early claims by Dick Eastman, Tom Flocco, V.K. Durham and Karl Schwarz that the September 11th attacks were meant as a cover-up for financial crimes being investigated by the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), whose offices in the Pentagon were destroyed on September 11th.[1] After six years of research, this report presents corroborating evidence which supports their claims, and proposes a new rationale for the September 11th attacks. In doing so, many of the anomalies - or inconvenient facts surrounding this event - take on a meaning that is consistent with the claims of Eastman et al. The hypothesis of this report is: the attacks of September 11th were intended to cover-up the clearing of $240 billion dollars in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund a covert economic war against the Soviet Union, during which ‘unknown’ western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry, with a focus on oil and gas. The attacks of September 11th also served to derail multiple Federal investigations away from crimes associated with the 1991 covert operation. In doing so, the attacks were justified under the cardinal rule of intelligence: “protect your resources”[2] and consistent with a modus operandi of sacrificing lives for a greater cause.
Brought up by Howard in the Podcast was the Franklin Cover up. I'm not sure how this ties into the topic. This may be trivial, but Howard said his father died in 1992 at age 44. He would have been born in 1948 and in 1968 when the WTC was being built we would have been only 20. So how old was Howard who overheard all of these conversations?
ReplyDeleteThe Child Prostitution Ring that Reached Bush Whitehouse
http://www.voxfux.com/features/bush_child_sex_coverup/franklin.htm
The following archive paints a chilling portrait of what is really going on in the upper echelons of the ruling elite here in America. The story involves children from orphanages in Nebraska being flown around the United States by top Republican officials in order to engage in child sex orgies with America's ruling elite. It is a fact that during the 1980's, child sexual services were provided by top Republican officials to key, bureaucrats and diplomats but most importantly, there is a chilling proximity of all of these events and personalities, to the President of the United States at the time, George H.W. Bush. And there have been victims who claim that the President himself engaged in the activities. It is a tale of child sex, murder, espionage, blackmail, and huge payoffs. And all the players are involved. From the White House to the CIA to the media barrons to the Republican elite - right down to the orphanages where they procured their victims.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message322266/pg1
Retired NYPD detective names men who sent Johnny Gosch's mother photos of her kidnapped son
NYPD Detective Jim Rothstein, who arrested 'Operation 40' CIA assassin Frank Sturgis, one of the men he claims was involved in the murder of President Kennedy as one of the shooters hidden that day at the Grassy Knole in Dallas, was recently interviewed by Greg Szymanski. Rothstein names the two men who last year sent photos [link to johnnygosch.com] of Johnny Gosch and other boys that were taken shortly after he was kidnapped into a pedophile ring. Hear the explosive new information at [link to www.arcticbeacon.com] (2nd hour).
Yes, there is something fishy about this age thing.. according to Howard's VT Bio, he says he was born on 5-30-53... That would put his dad at age 5 when he was born. Right?
Deletehttp://www.veteranstoday.com/author/howard-t-lewis-iii/
I refer to this puzzling date because after the demolition system was demanded and all the short cuts forced into the project without any valid inspections, my father was crushed by this highly illegal change in the project. To this day in 2018, the threats and actual attempts on my life prohibit my raising a family. I have a blood stained military knife I took off somebody and an infrared photo of 2 guys with shotguns trespassing before they broke into my van hoping to catch me asleep. I have to listen to a pack of yipping lap dogs' critiques, with next to ZERO public support. Joan Edwards, you are not a yipping lapdog, and I thank you. I mention Franklin Cover-up because U.S. Army Major M./ Aquino kidnapped Johnny Gosch for the degenerate Bush41. His behavior focuses on self-aggrandizement.
DeleteDad died in spirit in 1969 but carried on until 1992.
DeleteWhat happened to witnesses in the Franklin coverup:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asvl6kO1Vo8
? Conspiracy Of Silence (Banned Discovery Channel Documentary) - YouTube
Based on DeCamp's riveting book, The Franklin Cover-up, "Conspiracy of Silence" begins with the shut-down of Nebraska's Franklin Community Federal Credit Union after a raid by federal agencies in November 1988 revealed that $40 million was missing. When the Nebraska legislature launched a probe into the affair, what initially looked like a financial swindle soon exploded into a startling tale of drugs, money laundering, and a nationwide child abuse ring. Nineteen months later, the legislative committee's chief investigator died suddenly and violently, like more than a dozen other people linked to the Franklin case.
Jim, I just want to correct you on your physics because repeating your mistaken concept of Newton's 3rd Law flaws your otherwise excellent narratives. Law the applies to two objects in contact. When one object exerts a force on another, the other object applies an equal but opposite force. But turning a collision around and does not work. F=ma so a heavier object traveling at the same velocity exerts a greater force. In each case the 3rd law applies, but the forces are different as greater energy is required to accelerate the heavier object.
ReplyDeleteBut the effects would be the same. It is a function of the relativity of motion. You can take the building as your frame of reference (stationary) and have the plane fly into it at over 500mph or take the plane as your frame of reference (stationary) and have the building fly into it at over 500mph. It's as simple as that.
ReplyDeleteDude, when I say 4,500 exploding bolts were delivered to the WTC twin towers project 1970-1972, I am not blowing smoke. I, as in 'me, myself, and I' am the person who suggested NASA be contacted as the most likely entity who might know where to get 2,500 exploding bolts like those Grissom used to blow the hatch on his capsule so he could jump out instead of sinking to the bottom of the Atlantic ocean. 2,000 more were supplied per a second order.
DeleteI know from personal experience that a .22 long rifle lead slug can pass through a steel stop sign, but a .22 short usually does not fully penetrate.
DeleteExploding bolts. 2,500 delivered for the test on the WTC tower pototype, and 2,000 more delivered to the Manhattan jobsite. That should be easy enough for a 10 year old to understand, and believable enough to get Richard Gage wet.
DeleteNuclear Demolition of Skyscrapers
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_uranium26.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"This ability of nuclear demolition to pulverize steel and concrete alike is one of its unique features.
"The picture below [oranges covered with dust] shows an example of that fine microscopic dust that covered all over Manhattan after the WTC demolition. Many people mistakenly believed that it was allegedly "concrete dust". No, it was not. It was "complete" dust - mainly pulverized steel.
"Despite common misconception, the WTC structures did not contain much concrete. Concrete was used only in some limited quantities to make very thin floors slabs in the Twin Towers construction. It was not used anywhere else. The major part of the WTC Twin Towers was steel, not concrete.
"So this finest dust was in its major part represented by steel dust accordingly.
"Though, it was not only "steel dust" alone - it was also a "furniture dust", "wood dust", "paper dust", "carpet dust", "computer parts dust" and even "human dust", since remaining in the Towers human beings were pulverized in the same manner as steel, concrete and furniture.
NOT PULVERIZED, resin cement denatured to dust, and sublimated steel.
Delete"F=ma so a heavier object traveling at the same velocity exerts a greater force"
ReplyDeleteYour error is to assume the lighter object remains fixed in place in the frame of reference in which the larger object is moving towards it.
Imagine two balls, one very much lighter than the other. And let's roll the lighter one towards the heavier. Let's assume the heavier is so heavy that it is effectively fixed in place (the trade tower was not only much heavier, it was also in fact fixed in place.) In the frame of the lighter ball rolling towards the heavier, we see the lighter ball impact off the heavier and bounce away in the opposite direction.
In the frame of reference of the heavier ball moving towards the lighter ball, we do *not* see the heavier ball bounce off the lighter ball in the opposite direction (which would happen if the lighter ball had been fixed to the ground, and the impact force would indeed have been much greater) - instead the heavier ball pretty much maintains its speed and the lighter ball starts travelling away at twice the speed of the heavier ball in the direction of travel of the heavier ball.
This example is of an elastic collision, of course the plane impacting the building was inelastic (the plane crumples into the building -ar at least it should, of course the vidoes show it breaking all physics and *sailing* into it-), but that does not affect the argument, because the plane is not claimed to be fixed to anything in the opposite frame of view.
So, Jim is correct in that it is a function of the relativity of motion. It would be a different matter if he was claiming in the frame of motion of the building travelling towards the plane, that the plane was fixed to something.
Exploding bolts freed 1/2" to 1.4" steel panels folded in and kicked a few feet by 200,000+ pound jets travelling at over 280mph did it as planned.
DeleteI attended a lecture recently given by artist Paul Laffoley in Seattle. He was trained as an architect at Harvard and upon leaving there went to work as a draftsman for Minoru Yamasaki who was designing the WTC. Laffoley told the audience in passing (the lecture was about his art not 9/11) that some Middle Easterners showed up one day at Yamasaki's office in NYC inquiring about the plans for the built in demolition charges. This tidbit about his work as an architectural draftsman was just sort of thrown out there with no response to it from anyone in the audience during the Q. and A. afterwards. It was a curious anecdote which Loffoley followed up by explaining that architects and engineers had already started designing buildings for pre-planned demolition in Las Vegas. Mr. Lewis said no blueprints for the WTC had ever been found. If this is true than maybe Lewis and Laffoley are both right about this.
ReplyDeleteMore accurately, I would have stated that I had yet to be able to track down a set of original blue-prints or even one page of them. All web site input has inexplicably neglected to mention that blue prints were used to communicate the method and specifications of how these buildings were erected, as with ANY structure. This examination would reveal just what massive piles of self-indulgence the WTCs I and II actually had been. I have been acquainted with some, but not all, World Trade Center I and II structural shortcomings since before the steel was up ten floors. They looked grand as Hell, until one peeled off the make-up.
DeleteLike having your kids run into Michael Aquino and marry below their species while you can only stand by and watch.
The painters DID NOT KNOW they were applying anything but durable metal primer on the structural steel. This I know.
All construction of homes up to airplane hangers MUST BE INSPECTED by a government authority before commencement of the actual building activity. dr. Fetzer indicated to me that library archives had been stripped of relevant materials. This is to be expected considering the nature of the crime. I alsao am next to positive that this documenrt destruction was carried out before 9-11-2001. This is in the tradition of the looting and destruction of the libraries at Alexandria by the Roman empire, now manifested as the Vatican and City of London, This alliance is not exactly the Roman Empire. This is difficult to say one way or the other. by destroying inconvenient truths, swine rule. The City of London and the Vatican are aware of this. As are the perpetrators of the attacks of 9-11-2001, HAARP, Wall Street looting, B.O. the phony, etc..
You got that right. who+dares+wings, A++++
Deletewho + dares + wings, I said I HAD AS YET and others have not been able to locate an entire set of WTC tower plans. They are out there.
DeleteFriggin Google. My father's spirit was traumatically crushed over this reversal of fortune for the WTCs I and II. He died. Heart break can finish a guy off. WTC 7 would be through a completely different set of contracts with a completely different engineering team. He kicked the bucket in Seattle, our home town, in 1992. His last project was the Hyatt Regency on Kauai, Hawai'i. He cursed this project because although it maximized natural flora and geographical features, it was not wild Hawai'i. Also, he had wanted to retire but the temptation of a huge raise in money deprived him of a few years of retirement. three packs of Pall Mall big red cigarettes and a minimum of 6-16 ounce beers DAILY cut his life short. The day after he died, Hurricane Iniki made a right angle turn and the epicenter passed directly over this brand new resort, obliterating most of the less durable features and postponing opening for a year. You can check out his Seattle obit page and the history of Hurricane Iniki.
ReplyDeletenuclear event which with the other ordnance, vaporized the entire World Trade Center buildings I and II. Other smaller WTCs were loaded that morning or the previous night where people usually worked. Sworn statements are my source for this.
MMMM most all of what I state here is from memory of events I was present for discussion as they occurred. I have been called 'Howard the Coward' by siblings and cousins older than I but this stopped after I wailed on them for a few years.
There are a lot of very talented serious people putting out immense effort to solve and prosecute for these crimes, including the honorable Dr. James Fetzer, whose work I have studied for years. Disinformation evokes a response. With me, it has helped immensely in recalling facts as I observed, heard, and documented 41 to 45 years ago.That is a long time. Listen tight to this. When it was known that the WTCs I and II would last a maximum of 40 years, cost cutting went into 5th gear. with the Rockefeller/Bush criminal cabal in government passing inspections of the omitting rivets in structural steel, electrical conduit, and a cessation of welding the 10' X 30' exterior perimeter steel panel assemblies to each other. Other cost cutting occurred, but I want to be able to truly remember specifics before chancing committing a slander. The painters DIS NOT KNOW they were spraying on anything but common commercial grade paint. The Skilling Engineers were extremely P-I-S-S-E-D O-F-F about the preset demolition system going in and the shitty work commencing to minimize financial losses over which their quality control was terminated by the developers and their punks in government
When the jets hit panels of 1/4" or 1/2" thick walled square tubes 30 feet long (which were m erely bolted in place) at 300 miles per hour minimum, these 200,000 to 300,000 pound jets met little resistance. My photo copies of damaged core columns establish that it took a great many of them to halt these jets' forward progress. I still need to determine the gauge of material used for the cores at the impact elevations.
I wish I would have had original blue prints so I could have sooner produced accurate information. I have not seen originals in 42 or 43 years.I have reached up as high as 117 million search results after first posting everything I could remember at Activist Post Architects and Engineers Question...Comments. They are still there and they are still very accurate from my 2010 recollections. Yahoo Search and Google Search have reduced my '"Howard T. Lewis III" search results to a few thousand numerous times.
Any more questions?
One of my Great great grandfathers was the first Territorial judge for Washington sate way back when, and the worst thrashing I ever got was for lying to my father.I lied to him once while I lived in his home. serious people do not lie.
If I can get to Seattle, I may be able to find some original blue prints.
Get John Lear out here.
CORRECTION: The painters DID NOT KNOW that they were applying a material which incorporated the use of radioactive material. The stuff was applied in a portable electrical field which two assistants moved along as the painter proceeded with a 3-hose pot of paint.
DeleteI mention Blackbeard and Henry Morgan because they were murdering pirates just like Bush41 and Bush43, Averell Harriman, John Kerry, BlackStone investment, et al. who all fly the Jolly Roger as Skull and Bones Society enterprises still with fealty to the British royal family. bush41's S&B name is Molloch. Look up who the Semite God Molloch was. The owl at Bavaria Grove. They and their charges are currently looting Wall Street and the American banking system, with the Rothschild owned American Associated Press and Reuters News service and their Council on foreign relations CFRtv and its total control over all national network corporate television news. The SCOTUS passed a decision a couple years ago where they decided that since no contract is written or implied, the CFRtv and others are under no legal obligation to tell the truth while presenting a 'newscast'. I would never stoop so low, especially as the CFRtv and Rothschild publications are doing today. Sorry you didn't know this.
ReplyDeleteAgain for the 50th time. The cement was a resin based cement which DID NOT require a high velocity nuke explosion to 'pulverize'. It was not 'pulverized'. It was incinerated and crushed into dust with the power necessary to crush a 5 inch thick piece of chalk.The Steel was NOT 'pulverized'. it immediately sublimated and cooled into dust. Isotopes discovered in paint samples from unburned steel beams and columns by Dr. Ed Ward, MD were the third step of a tertiary
Reread this above comment. See Dr. Ed Ward, M.D. he knows. His group scraped some primer paint off scrap from the WTC tower demolition from Fresh Kills Land Fill and FOUND LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPES as I told him he would find.
Delete...nuclear event which vaporized the WTCs I and II. Other WTCs were loaded just before the morning of 9-11. Especially where people usually worked.
ReplyDeleteAny questions? Get John Lear out here.
Blackbeard's flagship was named "Queen Anne's Revenge". This is important because it proves fealty to the English Crown by flyers of the 'Jolly Roger' flag. George Herbert Walker Bush flies the same flag, for the same reasons. German blooded English royalty. It is that simple,
ReplyDeleteWhen was I evasive? John Lear is evasive.
The very wealthy among us have the ability to go off on flights of self-indulgence of epic proportions. Listen to George Green or the Rothschilds go on. Listen closely to Aaron Russo's rehashing of an interview with the Rockefeller who spilled the beans about the upcoming 9-11 attacks. Listen to Jordan Maxwell lectures. There is a degenerate subgroup in the extremely wealthy population among us who answer to NOBODY because of their surrounding church brainwashed populations who accept their place as 'The Golden Calf' and ultimate authority. To attack this authority is to invite a powerful backlash. I know I could get a well paying job with them, but since they blew up the WTCs and Fukushima, I realized any help I would provide them would eventually be used toward killing us all through their unfitness to survive by virtue of their being reckless, superstitious, and surrounded by likewise brain-addled sycophants. And besides, I like people better than dogs.
ReplyDelete"If you don't do your homework, you will flunk." This is the best advice I ever received from any of my college professors. Life takes this to extremes. Ignorance is not a survival technique.
"exploding bolts". For some reason in the summer of 1969, Dick Eisenger of Skilling/World Trade center customer employment, was looking for exploding bolts. Why? Thermi(a)te softened or liquified panels would be guaranteed to fall in if exploding bolts were initiated just before contact. One of the 'Dancing Israelis' was a demolitions expert AND one of the Israeli 'performing artists' camped out up in the WTCs.
ReplyDeleteThe name, Dick Eisenger(pronounced "Dick Eisenguh") cropped up in just a very few of my father's conversations when I was around, but I do not recall his being ties to this exploding bolt procurement at this time. This was 50 years ago. Give me a break and I will continue.
DeleteI would like to thank you for the efforts youve got produced in writing this article. I am hoping the same finest operate from you inside the potential also. Actually your creative writing skills has inspired me to start my personal BlogEngine weblog now.
ReplyDeletefha ny
structural engineer ny
My presentation avoids artistic embellishments. The only hypothesis I propose is the exact system by which the WTC perimeter walls were breached by the jet aircraft which caused limited damage to one or two floors composed of resin based cement poured into steel trays which were stiffened by lightweight but strong steel trusses. Photoshop technology is a mind blower until you spend time examining the illusion providing the delusion. All materials I speak of in this interview and comments were present on site under the control of Bush cabal personnel who actually manufactured a thermitic material like that used. Most of the sprayed on thermi(a)te primer had low radioactive isotopes. This is NOT hypothesis. I documented all of this stuff long ago. Directly from the source.
ReplyDeleteI am not alone in my recollections. I am here to relate the truth about what occurred. This was a sacrifice to Molloch. My father was not jewish and he bailed in 1970. Photos prove his presence and participation, as did the pay stubs.
Hey Dr. Fetzer, your interview with Karen Hudes was outstanding. KUDOS!! for getting her to say that the UK should be the basis for international standards as to what should constitute the universal morality of law. My own jaw dropped before the hysterical laughter kicked in.
By the time I had listened to yours, I had heard four other interviews, Project Camelot and others, all omitting this rider. That hag really knows how to include the fine print in pale letters or disappearing ink. In this regard, it might help to know that if you use lemon juice as an invisible ink, you can make the image visible with a little heat from a candle. I learned that in Cub Scouts. Thanks for your work. To hell with the CFR and The City of London.
Where is my God damned interview?
ReplyDeleteCORRECTION: Where is my honest GOD BLESSED interview. It was damned by the devil and I was momentarily confused. No longer. EVERY WORD of that interview I still maintain to be the unembellished truth. More details such as the REAL purpose of the many tanks of freon scattered about the structures. NOT for trash can fires. AND, the demand that theKellogg nuclear fusion demolition system be installed was NOT over fear of the WTCs tipping over after an Act of God, as stated in the contracts. The demand of installation came MINUTES after the successful test of the lower and upper demolition fusion reactors in early 1969. Two meetings of three were held at our home in Seattle summer 1969 between the engineers and the NYC/NJ Port Authority and the insurance underwriters filing the complaint to get a guarantee of a VERTICAL COLLAPSE, should the WTC towers structurally fail. The low level radioactive isotope component material was sprayed on with the primerpaint, and late in the project, the bottom 10-15 stories of vertical columns were filled with the same resin cement as the material poured into steel trays to form each floor. I can not believe anybody could be reading this. Every word is 100% accurate.
DeletePlease note the ends of the vertical columns severed at the impact sites on the WTC towers. Please note the oxy-acetylene cutter severing the corner columns to unbalance the structure, as the demolition system was designed to respond to if the towers were damaged. This is NOT THEORY. NOTE THE STILL SQUARED OFF ENDS. This means the bolts had been removed. I maintain the 4,500 exploding bolts ordered DIRECTLY BY THE ROCKEFELLERS, allegedly for jet pack commuter hangar doors, were indeed used to separate these thin steel perimeter panel assemblies on 9-11-2001, perhaps triggered by the grounding of the jets' electrical fields on the impacted steel. I told my father he might find these bolts through NASA, as Gus Grissom had used NASA's emergency hatch exploding bolts to escape his space capsule before it sunk. That is where these bolts came from. I found them, Lewis and Johnson bought 2,500 them for the Rockefellers, summer of 1968 and bought another 2,000 within a year.
ReplyDeleteI hear crickets.
ReplyDelete