The possibility of media complicity (and that the media is an arm of the military - psyops) should not be discounted.
To say "all" the videos, photographs and witness are fake is probably a stretch. But it's interesting that Youtube came out just a few years later to propagate all the "evidence". So why let us keep and distribute all the evidence? Perhaps it's all a red herring? The only thing we know for sure is that the buildings were taken down.
The possibility of media complicity (and that the media is an arm of the military - psyops) should not be discounted.
ReplyDeleteTo say "all" the videos, photographs and witness are fake is probably a stretch. But it's interesting that Youtube came out just a few years later to propagate all the "evidence". So why let us keep and distribute all the evidence? Perhaps it's all a red herring? The only thing we know for sure is that the buildings were taken down.