Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Jim Fetzer and Clare Kuehn

9/11 TV fakery: Planes or no planes?
Posted by at

2 comments:

  1. AnonymousSeptember 8, 2012 at 5:07 AM

    The bullet/plane analogy is outstanding. I think that might make some headway with the general public. If a lead bullet can't penetrate the building how the hell can an aluminum can flying at (supposedly)560 mph melt into a building? But most of the public believes that if they saw it on TV it must be real.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Clare KuehnSeptember 17, 2012 at 3:52 PM

    Yes. It's an instance where this is the ONLY thing to start with: it's a direct assault on the impression intended by the perps. All the rest cannot usually make its way into people's pates (heads) until this is answered. ----------- For example, with PID, Don, as you know, the first 2 issues to address are that a) P looks/acts/sounds "the same" and b) that family of P, etc., couldn't "go along". THE ANSWER IS THE FORENSICS: THAT IT WAS DONE AND HAPPENED SO THE OTHER THINGS MUST BE WRONG IMPRESSIONS. :)

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)