Monday, June 25, 2012

Kevin Barrett and Clare Kuehn

The Vancouver Hearings re 9/11

6 comments:

  1. please repost, was truncated

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry about that. We'll repost it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jim, I never heard this mentioned on any show. Look at this picture: http://jabbajoo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c0ac653ef00e5537c495d8834-pi If something went in, shouldn't the steel outside frame being pointed inwards??? Funny how aluminium cuts through steel

    ReplyDelete
  4. Donald Fox's blog has many of the presentations posted in powerpoint, word and pdf form, eg. here:

    http://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2012/07/01/clare-kuehns-vancouver-powerpoint/

    Real shame about Judy Wood's combative personality, cos I think her DEW hypothesis is closest to the truth out of all researchers currently. Like Clare Kuehn says, proponents of all other theories seem required to ignore important evidence in the form of effects or fail to explain it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Another great show. Kevin doesn't seem to buy the dew theory. Agree that Dr. Wood is closest to the truth and therefore at the greatest risk to speak out and overspeculate. Not sure if she is running Andrew Johnson or she is in control of him. Either way they seem to imply that Dr Fetzer is a "muddler " and therefore a disinformation agent. I like both personalities and therefore think they can come back together for a consensus.

    ReplyDelete