Friday, January 21, 2011

Dimitri Khalezov

9/11: Nukes at the WTC?
Posted by at

10 comments:

  1. jakeFebruary 2, 2011 at 1:28 PM

    I must say that the 600 min interview with Dimitri was very interesting. He was candid, and the moment he mentioned that the plane was far to weak to penetrate the exterior beams then the trusses and floors nonstop without slowing down. I can assure you that in the real world these facts are true. When it came to his theory however he had one major problem, and that was the bathtub. I think that getting to the bottom of exactly what happened to the bathtub is the key to this new twist on things.

    ReplyDelete
  2. teouiFebruary 10, 2011 at 2:57 PM

    Khalezov's theory doesn't correspond to what we know of the propagation of disintegration of structures in a nuclear shock wave. The disintegration occurs outward from the blast point not in the reverse direction toward the alleged blast points as clearly apparent in 911 videos.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Robert B. LivingstonFebruary 12, 2011 at 9:07 AM

    Surprised that this "alternative theory" has been submerged so long.

    I've always believed, as Dr. Fetzer, that all possible explanations about how the buildings in New York were destroyed on 9/11 should be investigated-- certainly not censored.

    Even should Khalezov's theory prove incorrect, his perspectives shed light in other areas. For example, about why the BBC prematurely reported the destruction of Bldg 7. Whether because of nuclear weapons or not, it seems logical that officials warned people in advance-- just as Silverstein fecklessly revealed in advance of the destruction of 7, that "we decided to pull it".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. anthonyc31February 21, 2012 at 12:12 PM

      the disinfo agents have infiltrated the various 9/11 "truth" movements ... to keep people moving away from the truth. If you notice, they keep harping "thermite" and "planes".

      I'd like someone to please explain why planes AND thermite? I mean, if you're going to destroy a building with thermite, why do you need planes? That would be 2 terrorist acts on each WTC tower. Makes no sense. The popular theories really don't add up, which is why there are genuine skeptics that cannot accept these theories and choose to support the official lie instead.

      The only logical explanation is exactly what Dimitri testifies to ... it was existing underground nuclear devices that were used to destroy the buildings. Even the "Bin Laden suitcase nuke" lie told to 9/11 officials makes sense on how all these seemingly good officials went along with the conspiracy to demolish the buildings. Watching Dimitri's explanation felt like a great episode of Colombo as he explained how each piece of evidence fit into the events of 9/11 (Doomsday plane, Sears Tower evacuation, Chief of police claiming secondary devices in buildings, massive amounts of dust, incredible temperatures burning for weeks, media confusion, impossible cell phone calls, Shanksville event, missile hitting the Pentagon, etc. etc.)

      Delete
  4. jakeFebruary 22, 2011 at 12:30 AM

    Teoui you misunderstand D.K. He claims the blast propagated up the tower about 2/3 up, claiming that under that top 1/3 the building was turned to powder. then the top part fell through this powderized zone. Just for your clarity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. teouiFebruary 22, 2011 at 4:01 PM

    I didn't misunderstand anything. The theory is preposterous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. anthonyc31February 21, 2012 at 12:04 PM

      1. His testimony to the WTC demolition is not a theory, it's testimony.

      2. After watching Dimitri's full documentary interview, the only thing preposterous is not believing what Dimitri says.

      Feel free to believe the original BS theory claiming that planes and hijackers were responsible for turning ~2,800 feet of concrete and steel to dust (WTC 1,2 & 7). That massive BS story falls apart at each sentence. You have to suspend various laws of physics and lower your IQ to below 80 in order to digest any part of that nonsense.

      One clear indication that it was indeed nuclear is the radiation sickness being reported by all of the 9/11 rescue workers. Rare radiation-related cancers and premature deaths are not caused by inhaling some "dust". They are caused by radiation. Radiation is created from a nuclear reaction. Wake up.

      Delete
  6. MassudoOctober 5, 2011 at 9:48 PM

    The fact that Dimitri Khalezov is an eyewitness of 911, and not a Conspiracy Theorist puts him in the forefront of the 911 truth movement.

    ReplyDelete
  7. anthonyc31February 21, 2012 at 11:56 AM

    Dimitri Khalezov explains the events of 9/11 better than anyone i've researched. No other explanation comes close to Dimitri's detailed testimony about the WTC demolition using underground nuclear devices. Here is a blog post with links to various evidence (videos and articles) that supports Dimitri's claims:

    http://ac31.blogspot.com/2011/09/support-ing-evidence-for-dimitri.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. Arts degrees are counter productive, gov subsidiesJuly 27, 2016 at 11:49 AM

    All one has to do is notice the chemical correlation between the bed rock granite and the mass spectrometer analysis of the dust.
    This easily explains away the mythical 'nano-thermite' as well as the fabricated from fiction DEW.
    Simple experiment:
    5gal bucket, gal of water. Set on flat concrete, throw in a cinder block. The water (plasma) that splashes out will make circles. Pascal's law~ pressure on a fluid is equal in all directions.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)