tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post7347798892909124693..comments2024-03-02T21:58:21.667-08:00Comments on The Real Deal with Jim Fetzer podcast: P.I.D. Clare KuehnUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger249125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-47642051635868973212015-06-15T16:52:58.367-07:002015-06-15T16:52:58.367-07:00Shouldn't you be getting ready
to go dig up yo...Shouldn't you be getting ready<br />to go dig up your mother again?<br />It's time for another of your <br />nightly visits. Take a good spade with<br />you - just in case the ground is hard.FreeRiderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08544438535320770154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-26328164165137339052015-06-15T16:07:38.287-07:002015-06-15T16:07:38.287-07:00Dum-dum. Oh, is that misspelled? Is that vitriolic...Dum-dum. Oh, is that misspelled? Is that vitriolic? Oh my goodness ... Not like some here LMAO<br /><br />Like JFK denial, u suck intellectually at this. Some cases have nothing, but you don't know how to know which, if you can't argue. You can't.... At least not per yr comment here.<br /><br />Ears are enough to know, but, like DNA, should have a case to show overall compatible likelihood and oh my there is. Sad 4u, as a tweet would say.<br /><br />Get into the case rightly then get over it or let it go if it were so silly.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11549009444728284914noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-11085090597226799952015-06-15T13:52:42.793-07:002015-06-15T13:52:42.793-07:00Clare Kuehn June 14, 2015 at 6:27 PM
"ear ca...Clare Kuehn June 14, 2015 at 6:27 PM<br /><br />"ear cartilage, art memoria, forensic aspects in photos, drawing, coats of arms, psychology normal aspects, blackmail, JFK link, events of history which are little known or well known and can't be changed, statements, etc.<br /><br />All are evidence and have reasoning for them.<br /><br />Paul died.<br />:)<br />sorry."<br /><br />= YOU GOT NOTHIN' !!!<br /><br /><br />LMAOJack Wilsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05705043376637209590noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-80269207350347612932015-06-14T19:58:12.689-07:002015-06-14T19:58:12.689-07:00"Yah, why bother with stupid issues if they&#..."Yah, why bother with stupid issues if they're stupid?<br /><br />Go to another thread."<br /><br />You're right, Clare. I agree. This whole PID thing is a load of stupid issues and yes, you should go to another thread.Guillaume Mercierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07054020595913646640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-77830428201495318732015-06-14T19:44:34.539-07:002015-06-14T19:44:34.539-07:00And ... those awful posts you love were "Acci...And ... those awful posts you love were "Accidentally deleted"? -- Reeeeally. LMAO.Clare Kuehnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08767270035823206231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-53158462012079229082015-06-14T19:41:19.349-07:002015-06-14T19:41:19.349-07:00since Paul is *not* alive and well, it would be ne...since Paul is *not* alive and well, it would be necrophilia.<br /><br />Hence Marten's comment, obviously.<br /><br />And it was one comment, not all over the place, per Jason Bellamy, to Marten: "you know so much about [necrophilia] and never stop talking about in here".<br /><br />Back to the topic now!Clare Kuehnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08767270035823206231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-1157235665881438452015-06-14T18:50:11.776-07:002015-06-14T18:50:11.776-07:00Jean, vous êtes mon héro. Alistair est une tête de...Jean, vous êtes mon héro. Alistair est une tête de merde. Je t'aime.Bisous.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09574330737340820280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-79444195296595215162015-06-14T18:45:44.299-07:002015-06-14T18:45:44.299-07:00Yah, why bother with stupid issues if they're ...Yah, why bother with stupid issues if they're stupid?<br /><br />Go to another thread.Clare Kuehnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08767270035823206231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-75926465271463284252015-06-14T18:43:37.712-07:002015-06-14T18:43:37.712-07:00Anyone calm, unprejudiced and sane knows:
All &qu...Anyone calm, unprejudiced and sane knows:<br /><br />All "ifs" in the broadcast were, as I stated, for the benefit of the as-yet-undecided ... for me to come down from expressing only my position, to talk from their position, then take them to this position long enough to work it out and decide without prejudice.Clare Kuehnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08767270035823206231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-71451702677960866732015-06-14T18:27:54.510-07:002015-06-14T18:27:54.510-07:00so again, let me post the gist of my replies:
ear...so again, let me post the gist of my replies:<br /><br />ear cartilage, art memoria, forensic aspects in photos, drawing, coats of arms, psychology normal aspects, blackmail, JFK link, events of history which are little known or well known and can't be changed, statements, etc.<br /><br />All are evidence and have reasoning for them.<br /><br />Paul died.<br />:)<br />sorry.Clare Kuehnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08767270035823206231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-9340749727672038012015-06-14T18:23:30.942-07:002015-06-14T18:23:30.942-07:00Right. Keep saying that this side has no evidence ...Right. Keep saying that this side has no evidence and it will be true? No more than with 9/11, etc.<br /><br />A case is judge-able on reasoning about the evidence marshalled, not on evidential items themselves, alone, ever.Clare Kuehnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08767270035823206231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-61420918958459922372015-06-14T17:55:54.502-07:002015-06-14T17:55:54.502-07:00Va te faire voir chez les Grecs!
Tu te fous de la ...Va te faire voir chez les Grecs!<br />Tu te fous de la gueule des gens <br />avec tes conneries, hein? <br />Espèce de con! Fous-nous<br />le camp! Ferme ta clape-merde!!<br />T'as un problème? <br /><br />Casse-toi!! Enculée de ta mère!!!Felix Gauthierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17389570030345844529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-14048755838973756292015-06-14T17:27:24.146-07:002015-06-14T17:27:24.146-07:00Clare:
This is the context of Marten Dekker's...Clare:<br /><br />This is the context of Marten Dekker's<br />distasteful remark to another blog user.<br />Dekker's offensive post betrays<br />a certain knowledge of the activities mentioned by him. Since Paul McCartney is alive and well, Marten Dekker's response is rather strange and worrying.<br /><br />One wonders if Marten Dekker engages now or has ever engaged in the "action" referred to by him.<br /><br />"Jack Denning June 11, 2015 at 12:07 PM<br /><br />" Totally fine to give him one. "<br /><br />LMFAO<br /><br />Have you any idea idea what 'give him one' means? Obviously not. Ask Paul McCartney.<br /><br /><br />LMFAO"<br /><br />"Marten DekkerJune 11, 2015 at 5:10 PM<br /><br />Paul is dead though if you'd like necrophilic action, please keep it to y'self."<br /><br />I think this is a clear case of TMI (Too Much Information) from Marten Dekker.<br />Jerry Collinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04315427574541740614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-67635172163644968092015-06-14T16:58:38.719-07:002015-06-14T16:58:38.719-07:00I am reposting these two comments
which were acci...I am reposting these two comments <br />which were accidentally deleted from the <br />Jim Fetzer's blog. I think they are two instruments which the blog cannot afford to lose. Future readers of the blog in generations to come will read them with interest. <br /><br />Please note the two posts appear here. <br /><br /><><br /><br /><br /><br />Clare used the word "if" about 48 times during the first segment (53 minutes) of this podcast. That's almost one "if" per minute. The use of sentential adverbs such as illocutionary, attitudinal, evidential and hearsay adverbs is quite apparent in Clare's speech patterns. Expressions such as "in fact", "supposedly" etc., etc. etc. are used during the full length podcast. The overuse of these expressions is, of course, designed to give a certain credibility, legitimacy. and validity to what Clare is saying - a credibility, legitimacy and validity which, what Clare is saying, does not necessarily have. <br /><br /><br />Other words used several times were: <br /><br />"But" <br />"Maybe" <br />"Supposed" <br />"Whether" <br />"Seems" <br />"Might" <br />"May" <br /><br />Too many ifs and buts etc., etc., etc. Where's the beef, Clare? <br /><br />http://www.mirror.co.uk/usvsth3m/ringo-starr-just-admit-real-526057<br /><br /><><br /><br />In the second half of the podcast Clare again engages in the use of expressions such as "in fact" and "actually" when there are no "facts" or "actuality" to support her specious, ill-founded and unsupported theorizing. This is not the terminology of reasoned debate from Clare; it is merely Clare's peroration aimed at gulling <br />and hoodwinking the listeners. <br />Clare is trying hard to do a snow job on the listeners by blinding them with <br />her pretentious, overwrought,<br />pseudoscientific and pseudojurisprudential verbiage. <br />What qualifications exactly does Clare<br />have in jurisprudence? Is Clare a lawyer<br />or is she just making up her "jury" hogwash? <br />No jury would entertain Clare's<br />rambling nonsense and would be cautioned by the presiding judge at the beginning of proceedings to ignore her mindless bilge and to think only about the EVIDENCE i.e. the PROOF presented to <br />them. Instead of PROOF of her claims, Clare offers "evidentiary types of evidence(?!!?)". Clare has not supplied any credible and conclusive PROOF for what she is claiming AND Clare is MERELY <br />"claiming". Clare has YET to provide totally VALID and totally PERSUASIVE evidence for her ersatz claims. Clare's "reasoning" is riddled with words such as "conceptual", "perceptual" etc., etc. which add nothing to her unsound "argument" and show conclusively that her PID contention is nothing more than a fraudulent, spurious and total deception which has no basis in the TRUTH.<br />What any jury wants is KNOWLEDGE<br />and PROOF of the FACTS. "Conception" and "perception" have no place in a court <br />of law. Clare's so-called "terminology of reasoned argument" would be laughed out of any court of law worthy of the name. No court anywhere would give even the least consideration to this bunch of unutterable PID fiddle faddle. Clare's amateurish "reasoned argument" is and remains mere conjecture, speculation and supposition without a shred of PROOF to substantiate her fallacious and factitious guff and clack.Teun van Westdijkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07349678619546679622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-80924435650483631202015-06-14T16:05:17.623-07:002015-06-14T16:05:17.623-07:00Why are you concerned with Clare's concerns, y...Why are you concerned with Clare's concerns, you busybody? Do you perhaps share Bryan's proclivities, if not his nationality, Miss Alistair? Go have a yok and a cuddle with your public school chums.<br /><br />That's all we need to know about you.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09574330737340820280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-28282726602928308352015-06-14T15:56:55.120-07:002015-06-14T15:56:55.120-07:00Jason, that's idiotic name-calling and conflat...Jason, that's idiotic name-calling and conflation.<br /><br />By the way, Marten only mentioned necrophilia; the context was a sexualized comment someone left insulting me, and left room for mentioning sex with Paul, and therefore a joke which would bring us back to the case:<br /><br />that since Paul is dead, it would be necrophilia.<br /><br />Now you might try fewer sniggering comments when you're not even accurate.<br /><br />-----------------<br /><br />Frank ...<br /><br />I answered your misunderstandings<br /><br />- about my use of the term "analysis" inflecting the meaning of the term "theory",<br /><br />- about what proper selection of facts is within an explanation (theory) vs "special pleading" (over-selection in the sense of *not accounting for* evidence properly or at all),<br /><br />- and about speculation within a good case vs calling all thought "speculation" ... the latter use being too wide ... since no evidence is technically philosophically self-evidently meaningful. Any controversy can be maligned improperly as "mere speculation" -- think of how it's done all the time to 9/11 Truth arguments.<br /><br />Now give this case a try. It will reward your efforts ... but even if it did not, so that I and many others had made an error in this issue of Paul's death, you are misunderstanding Fetzer's epistemological points.Clare Kuehnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08767270035823206231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-83954787348726260902015-06-14T15:37:23.163-07:002015-06-14T15:37:23.163-07:00Yeah. That must be what Jim meant when he said the...Yeah. That must be what Jim meant when he said the following to you during the "How to think about PID podcast."<br /><br /><br />At 35 minutes 37 seconds into the podcast.<br /><br />Jim said:<br /><br />"Clare, this is all quite fascinating but you haven't shown us any of the evidence, any of the clues......any of the things you are talking about. So you are talking about things you are going to be showing us but you're not showing them in order for us to know what you are talking about."<br /><br /><br />Hairgrowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11360374855418833507noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-67110238361583327242015-06-14T15:17:16.719-07:002015-06-14T15:17:16.719-07:00Brodie! Brodsky! Birdski! Birdshi! Dekker!
It'...Brodie! Brodsky! Birdski! Birdshi! Dekker!<br /><br />It's all the same thing!! Call a spade a spade!!<br /><br />LOLAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09349971477695098627noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-19308644743887618672015-06-14T14:51:46.081-07:002015-06-14T14:51:46.081-07:00By the way, check out S. Brodie. Maybe you could g...By the way, check out S. Brodie. Maybe you could give her a quick rundown on the necrophiliac night spots you know so much about and never stop talking about<br />in here. Can you supply S. Brodie with a good spade - just like the one in John Lennon's doodle? S. Brodie is hot to trot so show her a good time. I got a feeling you two were made for each other.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09349971477695098627noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-87217630806171939272015-06-14T14:26:27.603-07:002015-06-14T14:26:27.603-07:00Gosh, Frank. Clare uses a term before you do and i...Gosh, Frank. Clare uses a term before you do and it throws you?<br /><br />The Fetz's points are not well applied by you ... Clare understands 'em and "how you're pinned" down (to use a famous Leonard Cohen song) ....... So just go over Jim's epistemology epistles, look again at Clare's replies ...... Then get back to the PID episode, not yr emotional episode.<br /><br />Or choose to misunderstand ... But I hope your good sense will win. I'm sure everyone in principle wants that .......... Yah?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11549009444728284914noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-65860714353620314942015-06-14T14:04:08.791-07:002015-06-14T14:04:08.791-07:00"Unfortunately, Brodsky was using the homo co..."Unfortunately, Brodsky was using the homo comment in the traditional way, to suggest "pansies", people who are male and can't stand for themselves."<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Clare,<br /><br />Let us not concern ourselves with <br />S. Brodski. "She" is obviously a Greek <br />and lives in France.<br /><br />That's all we need to know.<br /><br />Enuff said.Alistair Finlayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01468291522151827466noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-63808926584288830832015-06-14T13:44:12.699-07:002015-06-14T13:44:12.699-07:00Bryan, your doublespeak styles you as either
a ba...Bryan, your doublespeak styles you as either <br />a bad reader or else one adept at distortion.<br />Probably both. “Repressed homosexual rage” <br />is not a phrase critical of LBGT, but rather a<br />psychological description of those people who <br />deny their own urges and attack others for being <br />or having what they secretly desire. I apologize if<br />I have touched a raw nerve or have inadvertently profiled<br />you. I do think, however, that considering your <br />sanctimonious language, you should crawl back to<br />whatever dark, anonymous space you inhabit with <br />others of your ilk and lick your wounds - or theirs,<br />if you prefer. [Clare, stop bandying words <br />with hypocritical chauvinists.]<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09574330737340820280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-91075000058797408472015-06-14T13:41:43.505-07:002015-06-14T13:41:43.505-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09574330737340820280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-82919289770721078602015-06-14T13:36:23.066-07:002015-06-14T13:36:23.066-07:00"It is you who is misleading." ?
Mislea..."It is you who is misleading." ?<br /><br />Misleading? <br />Why the strange use of the word "misleading" <br />where there is no preceding <br />textual use of the word "misleading" or <br />any similar meaning word in the above post? <br />Has someone accused YOU of having been misleading? <br /><br />Why do you accuse ME of being misleading?<br /><br />Am I being misleading for having <br />posted extracts from Professor Fetzer's<br />" THINKING ABOUT "CONSPIRACY THEORIES": 9/11 and JFK James H. Fetzer, Ph.D. " ?Frank Dyneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11350989835127436440noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-46092465874531519572015-06-14T13:31:23.195-07:002015-06-14T13:31:23.195-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09574330737340820280noreply@blogger.com