tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post1856251289423249748..comments2024-03-02T21:58:21.667-08:00Comments on The Real Deal with Jim Fetzer podcast: Jim Fetzer and Clare KuehnUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-4384806367702965652012-09-17T15:52:51.441-07:002012-09-17T15:52:51.441-07:00Yes. It's an instance where this is the ONLY t...Yes. It's an instance where this is the ONLY thing to start with: it's a direct assault on the impression intended by the perps. All the rest cannot usually make its way into people's pates (heads) until this is answered. ----------- For example, with PID, Don, as you know, the first 2 issues to address are that a) P looks/acts/sounds "the same" and b) that family of P, etc., couldn't "go along". THE ANSWER IS THE FORENSICS: THAT IT WAS DONE AND HAPPENED SO THE OTHER THINGS MUST BE WRONG IMPRESSIONS. :)Clare Kuehnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08767270035823206231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-62069332888560306922012-09-08T05:07:13.619-07:002012-09-08T05:07:13.619-07:00The bullet/plane analogy is outstanding. I think t...The bullet/plane analogy is outstanding. I think that might make some headway with the general public. If a lead bullet can't penetrate the building how the hell can an aluminum can flying at (supposedly)560 mph melt into a building? But most of the public believes that if they saw it on TV it must be real. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com