tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post1376182775757646531..comments2024-03-02T21:58:21.667-08:00Comments on The Real Deal with Jim Fetzer podcast: franklyspeakingUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger61125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-37121358176029978962013-12-18T14:15:59.507-08:002013-12-18T14:15:59.507-08:00Frankly Speaking:
Since the illiterate and arrogan...Frankly Speaking:<br />Since the illiterate and arrogant jorge refuses to write in English,<br />here's what the cunt wrote in his comment beginning with "Il faudrait... ( Translated as written by the Spaniard(?) jorge).<br /><br />"It would need too much time and a lot of people would arrive (?)<br />to work in the empty offices.<br />Everyone was asking: " Shit. What's happening? There are no tables or chairs. Where is my computer?"<br /><br />It's bad French and sounds fucking weird in English.<br /><br />Hope this helps. It's fair to say that your lack of French is an advantage in the circumstances.<br /> <br />You are missing nothing!!<br /><br /><br /><br />Sam https://www.blogger.com/profile/17251170074031017064noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-17945220129686415312013-12-18T13:53:11.036-08:002013-12-18T13:53:11.036-08:00"fausses"
jorge:
Tu écris le français ..."fausses"<br /><br />jorge:<br /><br />Tu écris le français comme un con.<br />Ferme ta clape-merde et va te faire foutre. Enculé de ta mère!! Casse-toi!!!Sam https://www.blogger.com/profile/17251170074031017064noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-82576561514255740322013-12-17T21:58:30.785-08:002013-12-17T21:58:30.785-08:00Jorge,
I urge you to keep an open mind as we unc...Jorge, <br />I urge you to keep an open mind as we uncover the truth about 9/11. Everything I said, was motivated by physical and logical necessity. Nothing that I said is physically impossible, but the Official Story is full of physically impossible things.Frankly Speakinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13203954120661228854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-74556931551480927352013-12-17T14:57:37.975-08:002013-12-17T14:57:37.975-08:00jorgeDecember 17, 2013 at 2:34 PM
« Le Fetz » est...jorgeDecember 17, 2013 at 2:34 PM<br /><br />« Le Fetz » est un grand Poobah. Le plus fou de l'idée, le plus il aime à l'exposer. C'est la raison pour laquelle il aime beaucoups « Frank Lee Speakin ». C'est rationalisme contre la folie. Et en cas de doute, jeter tout le blâme sur les sionistes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-65983490519691211722013-12-17T14:34:20.874-08:002013-12-17T14:34:20.874-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-47858106458245319172013-12-17T14:18:43.185-08:002013-12-17T14:18:43.185-08:00Si je vous écoute trop, je pourrais aller complète...Si je vous écoute trop, je pourrais aller complètement fou. Vous croyez sans doute dans la vierge Marie et Jésus est réellement Dieu. Peut-être aussi qu'il se ressusciter d'entre les morts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-7745754927172088282013-12-17T13:42:37.678-08:002013-12-17T13:42:37.678-08:00Additional point for Jorge: Perhaps you didn'...Additional point for Jorge: Perhaps you didn't understand, but when I say "phony media", I'm saying that there were many, many false news stories laid down about the activities at the WTC. In truth, I think that only the lobby, Windows on the World, and the Observatory were operating, and anything else was a bare minimum. And, in fact, no one was in the building on 9/11 itself. We will talk more about that on 12/23Frankly Speakinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13203954120661228854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-72429903186854814232013-12-17T13:39:39.358-08:002013-12-17T13:39:39.358-08:00Jorge,
Please check out the following:
PART 1: L...Jorge,<br /><br />Please check out the following:<br /><br />PART 1: Larry McWilliams and Phil Jayhan - The Hollow WTC Towers & Missing Contents 9/11:<br />Monday, August 9, 2010<br />PART 2: Phil Jayhan and Larry McWilliams - The Hollow Towers and Missing Contents 9/11:<br /><br />Also, please check out this:http://letsrollforums.com/press-release-world-trade-t24256.html?s=139f8501d313d30ab177b23338c5ad12& <br /><br />The arguments that you are making about empty offices work in the favor of my argument! There should have been thousands of desks, doorknobs, vending machines, etc.Frankly Speakinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13203954120661228854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-73571443955453137702013-12-17T13:28:06.152-08:002013-12-17T13:28:06.152-08:00Jorge,
Misunderstanding here. The Twin Towers and...Jorge,<br />Misunderstanding here. The Twin Towers and WTC7 were demolished by controlled demolition. But the videos shown to the world from major media, and "amateur" vidoes, and on YouTube, are in fact CGI. That is why they look exactly as they should to support the official story. The WTC7 looks just as it should to support the theory of fire-induced collapse. According to Simon Shack, the military and police authorities controlled the ability to take independent video by electronic interference and confiscating cameras. Also, in 2001, YouTube did not exist, limiting the ability to get possible independent video out to the world.Frankly Speakinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13203954120661228854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-23975168011188776362013-12-17T12:50:28.490-08:002013-12-17T12:50:28.490-08:00Il faudrait trop de temps, et beaucoup de gens arr...Il faudrait trop de temps, et beaucoup de gens arriverait à travailler dans des bureaux vides. Tout le monde demandait : « Merde, Qu'est-ce qui se passe? Il n'y a pas de tables ou des chaises. Où est mon ordinateur ? »Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-66736240881844611962013-12-17T12:35:12.065-08:002013-12-17T12:35:12.065-08:00Il est impossible de savoir avec certitude. Vous ...Il est impossible de savoir avec certitude. Vous prétendez les vidéos des tours jumelles sont fausses. Mais s'il est vrai que, le bâtiment 7 et les tours jumelles seraient encore debout. Il n'y aurait pas de nettoyer les décombresAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-61892049280670261282013-12-17T09:09:02.834-08:002013-12-17T09:09:02.834-08:00Jorge,
The videos are proven false because the eve...Jorge,<br />The videos are proven false because the events that they depict are technically impossible. The "Falling Man" is not in front of the WTC. http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?t=501 . The comparison picture of the WTC is below the Falling Man photo.Frankly Speakinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13203954120661228854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-7760550267007873902013-12-17T09:04:49.218-08:002013-12-17T09:04:49.218-08:00The only purpose of bringing the Holocaust into th...The only purpose of bringing the Holocaust into this discussion was to show the Revisionist method of Robert Faurisson. Please see this: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v21/v21n2p-7_faurisson.html . For the whole Faurisson picture, this: http://www.ihr.org/books/faurisson/faurissontoc.html .<br /><br />For the purposes of this discussion only, the Holocaust/gas chambers are examined as a technical/mechanical event. After "what happened" is determined, other thoughts and feelings about the event can follow.<br />Frankly Speakinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13203954120661228854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-49254840492563199922013-12-17T08:55:34.712-08:002013-12-17T08:55:34.712-08:00Joan,
The fact that the jumpers are CGI is very c...Joan,<br /><br />The fact that the jumpers are CGI is very central to the 9/11 story, because it is evidence that no one died at the WTC at all. We'll talk about that on 12/23.Frankly Speakinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13203954120661228854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-57444751137020406592013-12-17T01:49:11.663-08:002013-12-17T01:49:11.663-08:00OBF, I tend to believe there were no nukes but ins...OBF, I tend to believe there were no nukes but instead a dismantling of the WTC buildings,of which there are 7, not 9 as you state. If nukes were used, the core columns would have been destroyed but we see them in photos laid out in a hanger somewhere. Why would the contents of the buildings not be salvaged and sold? We did see trucks carting off loads of core columns. Anyway, Phil Jayhan and Larry McWilliams make this case on earlier podcasts. <br /><br />July 28th, 2010<br /><br />PART 1: Larry McWilliams and Phil Jayhan - The Hollow WTC Towers & Missing Contents 9/11:<br /><br />Monday, August 9, 2010<br /><br />PART 2: Phil Jayhan and Larry McWilliams - The Hollow Towers and Missing Contents 9/11:<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18417239844950950071noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-30471531024195015742013-12-17T00:41:56.565-08:002013-12-17T00:41:56.565-08:00I hope it's soon. Can't wait to see how t...I hope it's soon. Can't wait to see how this comes out. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18417239844950950071noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-82574912431046086872013-12-17T00:11:43.105-08:002013-12-17T00:11:43.105-08:00It's been so long ago, I'm not sure where ...It's been so long ago, I'm not sure where I got the information except that it was inspired by <br />remarks by Howard Lewis III below.<br /><br />The Real Deal with Jim Fetzer podcast: Howard Lewis III <br />Joan EdwardsOctober 3, 2013 at 11:13 PM<br /><br />Nuclear Demolition of Skyscrapers <br />http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_uranium26.htm<br /><br />~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />"This ability of nuclear demolition to pulverize steel and concrete alike is one of its unique features.<br /><br />"The picture below [oranges covered with dust] shows an example of that fine microscopic dust that covered all over Manhattan after the WTC demolition. Many people mistakenly believed that it was allegedly "concrete dust". No, it was not. It was "complete" dust - mainly pulverized steel. <br /><br />"Despite common misconception, the WTC structures did not contain much concrete. Concrete was used only in some limited quantities to make very thin floors slabs in the Twin Towers construction. It was not used anywhere else. The major part of the WTC Twin Towers was steel, not concrete. <br /><br />"So this finest dust was in its major part represented by steel dust accordingly. <br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18417239844950950071noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-59883021728100080182013-12-16T21:47:21.334-08:002013-12-16T21:47:21.334-08:00"How can one video prove another video false?..."How can one video prove another video false? Perhaps the alleged proof is also false." Atlanta Billhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13731574644449276796noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-44503153146761333162013-12-16T21:34:01.422-08:002013-12-16T21:34:01.422-08:00Well, Frankly, you're not only skillful at log...Well, Frankly, you're not only skillful at logic and reasoning--and at understating the physics so as apparently not to leave everyone behind (as reciprocal decency compels me to conclude)--but you're also a gentleman. <br /> <br />I'll examine the linked material, but I have to point out that I don't consider the Red Cross to be an objective source. They passed on the concentration camp at Theresienstadt (Teresín), giving out glowing reports to the world press. The precarious situation of the Danish and Swedish authorities who compiled the wartime data induced in them a readiness to believe the Nazis (an instance of cognitive dissonance if not of complicit skullduggery). Denmark was under German occupation, and Sweden was afraid they would be next. <br /> <br />Just glancing at the Red Cross link, I note that the author(s) fault a nemesis they identify simply as "the Jews", which indicates to me that they are blatant racists--and I'm not inclined to give any shrift to the arguments of open racists. <br /> <br />So, my assessment stands, despite your admirable gentility. To wit, you've participated in what I can only assume is a calculated attempt to introduce Jew-bating antisemitism into the Truth community and, by doing so, discrediting the community in the eyes of the public. Could Shin Bet have done a better job? Atlanta Billhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13731574644449276796noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-91743322378742765502013-12-16T19:46:44.432-08:002013-12-16T19:46:44.432-08:00>>>Might they have used DU which was used...>>>Might they have used DU which was used in Iraq to destroy armored tanks?<br /><br />No. Nuclear weapons using enriched Uranium, and DU are different things. Nuclear devices (neutron weapons) were needed to dustify the concrete.Frankly Speakinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13203954120661228854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-87526335767419797372013-12-16T19:16:58.505-08:002013-12-16T19:16:58.505-08:00OBF
You can, however, infer that nukes were used ...OBF<br /><br />You can, however, infer that nukes were used from the confirmed presence of concrete dust, even if the videos themselves are CGI.Frankly Speakinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13203954120661228854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-41138832821986842562013-12-16T18:14:24.462-08:002013-12-16T18:14:24.462-08:00Jorge, Could you clarify your comment in English,...Jorge, Could you clarify your comment in English, so I can answer it?Frankly Speakinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13203954120661228854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-83481324653753536242013-12-16T17:06:46.486-08:002013-12-16T17:06:46.486-08:00Ima Fakeologist said: "Is Fetzer slowly seein...Ima Fakeologist said: "Is Fetzer slowly seeing the light that shines so bright? " <br /><br />Errrrrrrrrrrrrrr..................... no. :-) <br /><br />Regards obf.Onebornfreehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17865185718738348312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-72231299516761500922013-12-16T16:49:26.421-08:002013-12-16T16:49:26.421-08:00Comment une vidéo peut s'avérer un autre vidéo...Comment une vidéo peut s'avérer un autre vidéo est fausse? Peut-être la preuve alléguée est faux aussi.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759924423263977907.post-63793367496117063322013-12-16T15:38:47.189-08:002013-12-16T15:38:47.189-08:00Jim Fetzer said :"Even in relation to the foo...Jim Fetzer said :"Even in relation to the footage of "the falling man", it appears that I was conned." <br /><br />You were not conned- you had an on air misunderstanding with your guest, concerning which images you were supposed to be looking at, and what they are supposed to be an example of, that's all. <br /><br />For a little more detail see my explanatory post for December 15, 2013 at 3:34 PM .<br /><br />Jim Fetzer said :" I am truly taken aback--and my impression of the whole Simon Shack effort has suffered a severe blow" . <br /><br />Now that has to be a joke. You remain almost entirely unfamiliar with the bulk of his research, and what little you have looked at to date you have consistently denigrated, so how can your "impression of the whole Simon Shack effort" have "suffered a severe blow"? <br /><br /> obf Onebornfreehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17865185718738348312noreply@blogger.com