No, he was not a "fake guest". He is a real person and a friend of mine. There are reasons why some prefer not to use their real names. If I think that is appropriate, then I agree to it. We have had lunch together many times and spoken on the phone even more. He is not used to being on the air, so he composed an extended outline. I am a bit disappointed at this form of accusation. If you don't want to listen to the show, don't. But why given all the interviews I have done you would post this attack is beyond me. Why didn't you give me a call and I would have explained it? If I have to choose between him and you, it is not a close call. This is a completely unwarranted criticism.
I could have added, "which is not his real name", if that is the issue. But that hardly justifies this severe and, in my opinion, unjustified attack. If he (Thomas Potter) thinks he has something wrong, let him explain what it is. This is the kind of bizarre response I would expect from Judy Wood or one of her zealous fans. I should have known: That explains it all, i would now guess, even though "Alan" is actually very interested in and supportive of her work.
I already consider this interview a classic Real Deal. - Anonymous guests are usually introduced as such. But since Jim is not a journalist by profession we should forgive him for that, period. The real issue is the fact that AA is afraid of giving his opinion using his real name: what does that say about America? - In any case I think it was an EXCELLENT interview, scripted or not. Sort of Coast to Coast like, but much better because Jim is 'the Real Deal'!
Thomas makes two astute observations. First, for over 100 years people who deal with these topics have died for suspicious reasons, gone missing, and been intimidated by the Government. Investigate for yourselves the experiences of Nathan Stubblefield, Nikola Tesla, T. Henry Moray, Deborah Chung, John Hutchison, and Eugene Mallove just to name a few. That I'm not willing to reveal my identity attests to the fact that I believe there is real danger here. As I stated, I'm only reporting on things I've learned that can be verified independently. Since it's not my own body of work, my credentials should not matter.
It was not that easy to come up with a cool name that didn't belong to a real person. I wouldn't want to be accused of identity theft or to cause someone else to be targeted.
Secondly, the discussion was not "scripted" but I obviously had an outline prepared on things I wanted to cover. While Jim is an outstanding interviewer, he never claimed to have a strong technical background. We discussed in advance that a typical question and answer format might not be an efficient way to cover the material in an understandable fashion.
This was a fascinating interview. I am a physicist so I just had to listen to it twice. I'd love to get a hold of anything that AA has written. I'll start with Doug Sweetser's website.
I could swear that JF called him "Kurt" at one point. His accent also suggests he is from Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota or thereabouts.
Listen, its clear this is cutting edge stuff that has been surpressed for over a 100 years. With the way Amerika has been evolving into the Fourth Reich, you have every right to be paranoid. IMHO Prof Jim and Alex Jones are the two bravest men in media. We need to back them and let the hijackers of the American government know there is a huge resistance to tyranny out there and that we are not afraid and the truth will not be silenced. Its easy to be critical of anything but to me Jim's work is among the finest and best out there. I listen to radio (via smartphone) 12 hours a day and have never been more impressed with host and guests alike.
The next time you bring a fake guest on your show to read a prepared script make sure you use a more common name.
ReplyDeletePublicBackgroundChecks
http://www.publicbackgroundchecks.com/SearchResponse.aspx?view=NM&fn=Alan&mn=&ln=Avalon&city=&state=&zip=&dob=&age=
ZABASEARCH
http://www.zabasearch.com/query1_zaba.php?sname=ALAN%20AVALON&state=ALL&ref=&se=&doby=&city=&name_style=1&tm=&tmr=
No, he was not a "fake guest". He is a real person and a friend of mine. There are reasons why some prefer not to use their real names. If I think that is appropriate, then I agree to it. We have had lunch together many times and spoken on the phone even more. He is not used to being on the air, so he composed an extended outline. I am a bit disappointed at this form of accusation. If you don't want to listen to the show, don't. But why given all the interviews I have done you would post this attack is beyond me. Why didn't you give me a call and I would have explained it? If I have to choose between him and you, it is not a close call. This is a completely unwarranted criticism.
ReplyDeleteI could have added, "which is not his real name", if that is the issue. But that hardly justifies this severe and, in my opinion, unjustified attack. If he (Thomas Potter) thinks he has something wrong, let him explain what it is. This is the kind of bizarre response I would expect from Judy Wood or one of her zealous fans. I should have known: That explains it all, i would now guess, even though "Alan" is actually very interested in and supportive of her work.
ReplyDeleteI already consider this interview a classic Real Deal. - Anonymous guests are usually introduced as such. But since Jim is not a journalist by profession we should forgive him for that, period. The real issue is the fact that AA is afraid of giving his opinion using his real name: what does that say about America? - In any case I think it was an EXCELLENT interview, scripted or not. Sort of Coast to Coast like, but much better because Jim is 'the Real Deal'!
ReplyDeleteI've only listened to the first 45 minutes or so, but a fascinating conversation so far-- thanks!
ReplyDeletewould have liked to have heard more discussion about nuclear weaponry at the WTC, which can of course account for the various phenomenon discussed.
ReplyDeleteSee:
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/
Good news everyone,
ReplyDeletethere's a great new fantasy movie slated for release at the tail end of 2012.
Title: "Kill Bin Laden"
Synopsis: The take-down of Osama Bin Laden from the point-of-view of the Navy SEALS.
http://www.movieinsider.com/movies/-/2012/
And again, the Oscar will go to a work of fiction.
Thomas makes two astute observations. First, for over 100 years people who deal with these topics have died for suspicious reasons, gone missing, and been intimidated by the Government. Investigate for yourselves the experiences of Nathan Stubblefield, Nikola Tesla, T. Henry Moray, Deborah Chung, John Hutchison, and Eugene Mallove just to name a few. That I'm not willing to reveal my identity attests to the fact that I believe there is real danger here. As I stated, I'm only reporting on things I've learned that can be verified independently. Since it's not my own body of work, my credentials should not matter.
ReplyDeleteIt was not that easy to come up with a cool name that didn't belong to a real person. I wouldn't want to be accused of identity theft or to cause someone else to be targeted.
Secondly, the discussion was not "scripted" but I obviously had an outline prepared on things I wanted to cover. While Jim is an outstanding interviewer, he never claimed to have a strong technical background. We discussed in advance that a typical question and answer format might not be an efficient way to cover the material in an understandable fashion.
In my opinion, if you're using the internet, it is not even the slightest challenge for intelligence agencies, etc. to identify you.
ReplyDeleteThis was a fascinating interview. I am a physicist so I just had to listen to it twice. I'd love to get a hold of anything that AA has written. I'll start with Doug Sweetser's website.
ReplyDeleteI could swear that JF called him "Kurt" at one point. His accent also suggests he is from Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota or thereabouts.
Listen, its clear this is cutting edge stuff that has been surpressed for over a 100 years. With the way Amerika has been evolving into the Fourth Reich, you have every right to be paranoid. IMHO Prof Jim and Alex Jones are the two bravest men in media. We need to back them and let the hijackers of the American government know there is a huge resistance to tyranny out there and that we are not afraid and the truth will not be silenced. Its easy to be critical of anything but to me Jim's work is among the finest and best out there. I listen to radio (via smartphone) 12 hours a day and have never been more impressed with host and guests alike.
ReplyDelete