Monday, January 5, 2015

Nicholas Kollerstrom

During the first hour, Nick Kollerstrom and I discuss the "false flag" attack on Charlie Hebdo in Paris, which was conducted by a professional, high-disciplined team, which went out of its way to leave false impressions that they were Islamic terrorists. Some of the give-aways include that the vehicle parked on an "+" mark in the street to make sure it would receive clear coverage, that the shooting of a police officer on the sidewalk did not blow his head apart and left no blood and that, at the "kosher" deli, an officer is firing from behind a vehicle into the store, which might have injured police in front of him had he not been using blanks.
Posted by at

16 comments:

  1. Ben KennedyJanuary 16, 2015 at 1:25 PM

    You talk funny.

    ReplyDelete
  2. apsterianJanuary 16, 2015 at 7:30 PM

    just another scummy, filthy, lying kike, obviously, ho ho ho oho

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nick DeanJanuary 17, 2015 at 6:16 AM

    I think he is infact a maverick as regards *Western* philosophy, as advertised.

    Standard *Western* philosophy would see him studying all the evidence before taking a definitive position on a controversial issue (not usually so with other peoples' traditions).

    Since we know the evidence is strongly against mass gassings [to death, he means] and points instead to the use of Zyklon-B for delousing only (similar amounts used at camps not designated death camps; no tell-tale blue walls at alleged gas chambers, only at acknowledged delousing sites; the reliance on the purported testimony of Höss with its many impossibilities such as guards removing gassed prisoners within half an hour of death, smoking and eating while they did so; and on and on... we can know he hasn't actually bothered to look at the evidence.

    How very maverick indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  4. VassarJanuary 17, 2015 at 2:33 PM

    Blasphemer of the Holy Spirit!!
    Slanderer of Christ!
    Antichrist!!
    Defiler of Christianity!!
    Scandal giver to the innocents!!
    Spawn of the devil!!
    Enemy of God!!


    Your destiny is the eternal fires of HELL!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Clare KuehnJanuary 17, 2015 at 10:41 PM

    Most persons in philosophy do not look into the Holocaust as being a potentially inaccurate official version, or into 9/11, or other things. The points about being carefully doubtful are valuable, but this person would not apply it carefully to THAT topic. That is their error, even if the Holocaust narrative is completely accurately told. (I am legally unable to comment on my personal take on that issue if it discusses almost any points made by revisionists.)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Clare KuehnJanuary 18, 2015 at 3:17 PM

    I hate that you are being persecuted, Nick.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Clare KuehnJanuary 18, 2015 at 3:19 PM

    Whom are you speaking to, SW? I am aware of the arguments. If you are addressing me, I am simply being careful of the law here in Canada, in what I say about what I know.

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousJanuary 18, 2015 at 6:56 PM

    Can't get this podcast to download from podbean. Is it hosting anywhere else?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownJanuary 19, 2015 at 6:22 AM

      I 'm not technically minded at all but I have downloaded the podcast same as usual, no problems, so it must be hosting from somewhere.

      Delete
  9. Andy TymeJanuary 18, 2015 at 10:22 PM

    The French Government's criminalising of viewpoints hostile to the Holocaust(tm) Fraudsters was FINALLY acknowledged yesterday on the USA's National Public Radio -- when a reference to it "slipped through" in a live-satellite interview with NPR's Paris correspondent.

    When the program host asked her what sort of "man-on-the-street" opinions (about the Charlie H. spectacle) she was encountering in certain majority-Muslim, Paris neighborhoods, the correspondent thoughtlessly paraphrased remarks she had heard criticising the HYPOCRISY of a nation that champions "free speech" whenever The Prophet (PBUH) is ridiculed but imprisons anyone who engages in the "hate speech" of doubting the Six Million.

    I imagine that hapless correspondent got a stern talking-to from NPR management soon afterward. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Father FedJanuary 19, 2015 at 4:04 AM

    "Anders, the "face-value, mainstream" version of the Nixon-removing, Watergate Scandal, now firmly cemented in politically correct, consensus history, was that it only became public knowledge due to an "heroic crusade" by two brilliant young reporters and their "independent-minded," curmudgeonly editor -- who had the guts-and-determination to "follow the money" and bring down a sleazy, paranoid (i.e. the "enemies list") president."



    Do you always believe what you see in the movies? "Follow the money".
    What other tooth-fairy "sources" do you "rely" on for your "research"?

    LOL

    ReplyDelete
  11. barrybJanuary 19, 2015 at 10:28 AM

    The congested natured of the new site may chase many listeners away. I know I am much less inclined to use it as it currently exists.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Jim FetzerJanuary 20, 2015 at 10:33 PM

    Perhaps you missed that, as of 5 January 2015, I have moved to a new "Real Deal" on Media Broadcast Center because I have VIDEO as well as AUDIO capability. If you want to view the slides we are discussing in addition to listening to our discussion, go to http://www.webookyourshow.com.

    ReplyDelete
  13. UnknownJanuary 28, 2015 at 4:39 AM

    All of Jim's new shows can be found below...every episode has a HD video version an audio mp3 and a download button as well a description and links for more info on every show, thanks!

    http://www.webookyourshow.com/blog/2014/12/06/THE-REAL-DEAL-with-James-H-Fetzer-on-MBC-TV.aspx

    ReplyDelete
  14. Clare KuehnFebruary 1, 2015 at 2:59 PM

    A video with the picture of the shooting of the police officer (which may be a fake moment, though others died later), showing that there was no blood anywhere from a strong gun blast, was immediately removed.

    I don't know if the gun shot had to be fake (some do not leave massive blood everywhere, of course), but the immediate removal suggests there's a problem there.

    The rest of the case is troubling, for who they were -- supported and partly protected fanatics, patsies and agents, probably. The target being the partial propaganda organ, Charlie Hebdo, is also troubling.

    Tarpley has a great early broadcast on the situation: http://tarpley.net/behind-the-charlie-hebdo-massacre-hollande-bucking-nato

    Of course then there's always the pat objection of the variety: "Not everything is a conspiracy of the important, big kind and you want to find them or are too open to thinking slight evidence is good evidence."

    Not everything, no & yes we're used to M.O. so we look for it and are more open to the possibility fully.

    Thanks, Nick.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Clare KuehnFebruary 1, 2015 at 3:00 PM

    This audio won't play. I know it doesn't have video, but won't you put up the audio here?

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)