Monday, December 31, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
PLEASE SUPPORT REVERE RADIO:
SUBSCRIBE to the RSS feed
DONATE to Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
---------
(Right-click on guest name to download mp3)
SUBSCRIBE to the iTunes feed
STREAM premieres on Revere Radio
5pm CST (2300 GMT) M-W-F:
---
Greg, your letters seem legit and I still recommend you send copies (good ones) for archival purposes to as many as you can, including Jim.
ReplyDeletePhysically as well as electronically.
Also:
Most of what you said makes perfect, if unhappy sense; but I completely disagree with the assignation of Spanish Juan Carlos as father of William. He, not Harry, looks very much like his father and grandmother, but not in definite shapes ("same ears") or anything. It's that he has a similar toothy flatness of face and Windsor smile.
Juan Carlos has a very much low jaw like a "square jaw" but not square, rather low and triangle, he has batwing brows (they angle up away from his centre thickly) and a droopy eye edge on both eyes, plus a rather thin but pointed mouth, and downturned nose.
If someone told you of this connection as parent, you have bought it in your enthusiasm, I'm afraid.
However, the idea that Victoria had a different son than was known, then EVEN IF Albert sired the other children and not Rothschild for all or any of them, then this is a momentous historical correction.
I thank you for bringing this information to the world.
As to Albert's non-siring of the children (even if he were predisposed to being homosexual), I feel you have not backed up your statements. Victoria was in deep mourning, for Albert, not merely as a cover -- it was clear she missed him. It would seem that you might back up your statements about that relationship better.
I am not nasty in saying this stuff; I intend to support your efforts for historical corrections.
Best wishes,
Clare
Before you express any further, condescending remarks, advise that you may benefit from availing your goodself of the immense back-up documentation behind the scant and largely irrelevant material repeated in this very short timeframe. Try typing in search engine 'Greg Hallet' the Hallet documents 1-4 perhaps? Opinion is one thing, informed opinion, another entirely.
DeleteCorrection: Greg Hallett Reports: 1-4 This is 5.
DeleteThis has to be the most frustrating interview I've ever listened to. For those of us who've listened to ALL of Greg's interviews, his many indepth excerpts and transcripts, which added tremendous weight and inspiration to 35 years of research, I just couldn't get over how the opening bombshells so vital to us in GB/UK the world, veered off track to backtrack over old ground. Old ground, old sounds with beatles breaks. Hoping we'd get back 'on track' to what's been going down from June to December and where he's going from here? Has anyone any idea of what is actually happening here in the Empire seat which governs America and events worldwide? Well, I do, I'm here and it's not a pretty sight. It's decidley Fourth Reich. I would have very much appreciated a straight through, no-nonsence run of catch-up; not with a 'muchraker' if you don't mind, but with Greg Hallet, Cold Case historian, sans 'beatles' thank you. This man is in far more danger and with far greater repercussions if he's topped, than Hailey who got a straight through 9 hours.I'd thought this might be appreciated. It's the difference between a psychopathic rule of future, as in the past, or an empathic, human one.
ReplyDeleteOh, and Clare, dear, it's all been totally documented if you care to look. Not difficult. Search Engine, type. You get the picture, you get the answers as all have already been provided, over and over. So if ppl need to have background, they can go get the work provided freely at so much personal cost and dedication.
Thanks anyway Jim, but we've gotta get to the now because the 'now' is critical to all else.Hope Greg returns to your show soon without breaks, on track, to the crux of the future possibility because we sure need some hope of a future.
The interview ended with parts about 'Sir' Jimmy Savile which should have been linked with the very beginning when Greg was explaining Max Clifford's connections. Does anyone realise what a HUGE pedo top level scandal Jimmy Saville's Royal Pedo connections and murders (Yorkshire Ripper) IS? That one case should and could blow the monarchy sky high.
4 minutes ... at the end when this should have constituted the 'meat' of the interview. This is being released HERE NOW and part of a terrible unleashing of Revolution to end ALL revolutions. GET WITH IT.
ReplyDeleteAlthough James Hewitt and Harry resemble each other. I don't yet believe the Harry conspiracy real father stories. I can see Diana's father in him and I see Charles and Prince Philip at times too. I find Hallett entertaining but very exaggerating.
ReplyDeleteThe level of 'interest' shown by listeners focuses on a minor aspect which, if they studied the history of these psychopaths would provide a backdrop of incest and debauch from which to judge the likelihood or otherwise of whether William and Harry have the same or different fathers, for a start. They have not and I think it highly unlikely that either of them came from Charles but this is only important due to the changes of succession and would otherwise be irrelevant to the much bigger picture presented here. Few bother to do the research. An essential aspect of intelligence is the ability differentiate between what is important and what is not. It is extremely sad that when the people are presented with 'the way' they lack 'the will' due to contentment in their programmed ignorance.
ReplyDeleteWe have irrefutable documented
ReplyDeleteevidence that Greg Hallett is, in fact, the bastard son of Louis Francis Albert Victor Nicholas George Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma KG GCB OM GCSI GCIE GCVO DSO PC FRS (born Prince Louis of Battenberg; 25 June 1900 – 27 August 1979). Watch YouTube for upcoming video disclosures.
New YouTube video offers further food for thought on Gregg Hallett's royal connexions:
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PA0trTJlKIc
If you're going to state such things, at least provide a link that works or the title of the YT presentations you're talking about. I typed in 'Greg Hallet's Royal Connections' and drew blank.
DeleteWas Al Capone or Buggs Moran entitled to Chicago? Come on Jim.
ReplyDeleteWhat killed me were the comments on waxwork Royal dolly, Kate Goldsmidt.
ReplyDeleteHubert and Randolph are probably 'twin' mirrors of one entity signing in to Blogger on same date. Shills, here for the 'thrills'. Anyone can download the Hallet coat of arms and geneology with no mention of Mountbatten, btw. Fetzer you need to wise up, shape up and get with the 'real deal' instead of betraying Hailey perhaps causing her death and living in a time warp mind morph of Tavistock Inst. Beatlemainia crap. By the way 'muckraker' is whre you're at, not in the league of a cold case historian like Hallett.
ReplyDeleteThe video tape is 100% better in translation than audio alone. Nice job, Jim.
ReplyDelete