At American venues, Obama claims he's a Christian. When he's spoken before Muslim audiences, he's claimed he's a Muslim. Please tell me what policies of Obama - with the notable exception of his RHETORIC about women's and LGBT rights - are an improvement on those of George W Bush! The élite needs a black face to carry out its hoodwinking of the people of this country so they will acquiesce as Obama and his cut-throat (or, if you prefer the euphemism, "humanitarian") allies in the Muslim Brotherhood network and NATO re-colonize the Middle East and Africa. Much more ground in this global strategy has been taken under Obama than the global state terrorists could ever have imagined under a white-faced Bush or a Romney. He's the biggest Uncle Tom of all time! I can just hear David Rockefeller and Lord Evelyn de Rothschild quoting B'rer Rabbit of the Uncle Remus Tales in unison: "Whatever you do, please don't throw me into that briar patch!"
On the WTC destruction, I still believe that Dimitri Khalezov's testimony gives the best answers http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/search?q=Dimitri+Khalezov When I, of late, reconsidered the Nuclear Hypothesis (after long ago rejecting the early attempts to put it forward), the problem of the standing bathtub walls seemed an unassailable obstacle to me too. John Keller brought up the fact that a 30-foot section of the bathtub seawall had "moved in[ward] 18 inches" (minute 24:30 of the interview). This could have been one effect of a preplanted underground device projecting a blast upward: as a consequence the Venturi Effect, the pressure of the ambient air around a constricted upward discharge would have decreased, causing the pressure differential with the walls' outside surfaces to move the walls inward. John Keller speaks of a "vertical tunnel shaft" (actually he says "shafts"), which is what Khalezov describes as an aspect of a preplanned nuclear demolition. The Venturi Effect is illustrated in this video (note the p2 label of the video and the "sucking up", so to speak, of air when a hole in the constriction is made): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wokswr_KHXQ&feature=related For the hole in the bathtub (floor?) see http://www.ny1.com/content/top_stories/20029/workers-rush-to-repair-huge-hole-in-wtc--bathtub- And supporting evidence for Khalezov's testimony here (originally linked by Anthony31): http://ac31.blogspot.com/2011/09/support-ing-evidence-for-dimitri.html
I can't resist commenting on minute 52:20, which explains an observation I had about a video that originally appeared on the AE911 website but was removed (on purpose?). I believed that this video showed an outside curtain of smoke moving down the (by then atomized, or to use Dr Woods term, dustified) sides of the South Tower to convince the eye that the tower was collapsing; and I thought that this effect had been achieved with small planted charges. I believe that John Keller's explanation for what I observed is the correct one. Thanks, Jim: "screening device" is a very appropriate term for the effect, on two levels.
Wow. I am sorry to say that this great "tent of opinions" is letting far too many people out of the rain. Thrusters on the corners, smoke bugles spouting images and a cooling bath in the basement clearly shows the host is dragging his listeners into lala land. Couple that with holograms and we have a kook cocktail designed to make even the most devout fan give up.Everything is possible and nothing is knowable is something I first heard from Fetzer. Now we know why.
Fine ... demonstrate where each point is incorrect. Supply us with some links. The only 9/11 version I don`t buy is the Official 9/11 Fairytale, but I`m also not so foolish to discount anything.
cluesforum.infotruthin7minutes.comradio.abirato.infoAll good places to do research.
The truth is often not knowable, but usually the lies are.
I have mixed feelings about this interview. John Kelly had some interesting points on the construction details, but then we got the bat-shit-crazy stuff too. Jim may be an expert in his field, but seems to have no working knowledge of elementary physics. That leads JF to consider theories based on laws that have no bearing on the collapse. Some of his "experts" are simply laughable. JF needs to consult some "real" physics professors ...